On 11 February 2013 07:15, Casey Dahlin wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:34:34AM +, Ian Malone wrote:
>> Gnome 2 slowly returned to the old behaviour in many ways. Gnome 3 is
>> starting to do this.
>>
>
> As someone who, I presume, does not like Gnome 3, and as someone who, I will
> wildly
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:34:34AM +, Ian Malone wrote:
> Gnome 2 slowly returned to the old behaviour in many ways. Gnome 3 is
> starting to do this.
>
As someone who, I presume, does not like Gnome 3, and as someone who, I will
wildly guess, shares the notion that GNOME devs are doing whate
Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2013, Enrico Scholz wrote:
>
>> I will revert most of your changes. please avoid to apply your personal
>> style
>
> Please remove tor-systemd and other "personal styles" that are against
> fedora guidelines
>
> with blocking security updates for yo
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
> Gnome 3 is designed for a touch interface. The majority of touch
> interfaces are mobile phones. Touch interfaces on computers are a
> minority. Gnome 3 is a poor mobile phone interface, but that doesn't
> mean it's a good laptop or desktop one
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2013-02-11
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again tomorrow. I'll be out for the day, so if someone
else could run the meeting
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013, Enrico Scholz wrote:
I will revert most of your changes. please avoid to apply your personal
style
Please remove tor-systemd and other "personal styles" that are against
fedora guidelines
with blocking security updates for your personal pleasure, you are
endanger
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> While I understand this, I'd like to note that IMHO Fedora package
> specs should not really have any 'personal style'. If they do, it means
> they are harder for people to co-maintainer or provenpackages to step
> in and fix things in case they need to.
This is a real problem
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> What's devend? Oh, you mean de-vendorize. Aren't hyphens great? ;)
>
Sure. An offlist mail is sufficient to note that. Help on the other
hand...
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
What's devend? Oh, you mean de-vendorize. Aren't hyphens great? ;)
On Feb 10, 2013 10:08 PM, "Rahul Sundaram" wrote:
> Hi
>
> I along with Jon Ciesla and Parag Nemade are working through this list
> slowly but there are over 600 packages. So we could use more hands
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/
Hi
I along with Jon Ciesla and Parag Nemade are working through this list
slowly but there are over 600 packages. So we could use more hands
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/Devendorize_desktop_files
If any provenpackager wants to pitch in, that would be great
Thanks!
Rahul
--
dev
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 22:23:50 +0100
> yersinia wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > > Greetings.
> > >
> > > I've setup a fedorahosted project:
> > > https://fedorahosted.org/formulas/wiki/WikiStart
> > >
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 22:23:50 +0100
yersinia wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Greetings.
> >
> > I've setup a fedorahosted project:
> > https://fedorahosted.org/formulas/wiki/WikiStart
> > and mailing list:
> > http://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/form
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I've setup a fedorahosted project:
> https://fedorahosted.org/formulas/wiki/WikiStart
> and mailing list:
> http://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/formulas-devel
> to discuss development of the formulas idea mentioned at
Greetings.
I've setup a fedorahosted project:
https://fedorahosted.org/formulas/wiki/WikiStart
and mailing list:
http://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/formulas-devel
to discuss development of the formulas idea mentioned at:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-January/1
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:12:44 +0100
Enrico Scholz wrote:
> Jamie Nguyen writes:
>
> > Thanks very much for adding me as a co-maintainer. I guess that you
> > probably don't have much time for updating the Tor package, so I'm
> > glad to be on board and will be taking a very active role in
> > ma
On 9 February 2013 12:25, drago01 wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
* Gnome 3 is going the I-know-better-then-you-what's-good-for-you
way.
>>>
>>> Sure by giving you an extension system that allows you to do whatever
>>> you want with the desktop
>>
On 9 February 2013 12:52, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le samedi 09 février 2013 à 11:34 +, Ian Malone a écrit :
>> On 9 February 2013 00:37, drago01 wrote:
>> > On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Martin Sourada
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >> * Gnome 3's target audience does not enclose majority of Gnome 2
On Dom, 2013-02-10 at 14:12 +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> Jamie Nguyen writes:
>
> > Thanks very much for adding me as a co-maintainer. I guess that you
> > probably don't have much time for updating the Tor package, so I'm glad
> > to be on board and will be taking a very active role in maintai
Olav Vitters writes:
>>> Somewhat funny that many users even don't know this tweak tool and ask
>>> everywhere about this..
>>
>> I always found it odd that gnome-tweak-tool even exists.. some
>> functionality are found in the system settings, some in
>> gnome-tweak-tool. If you ask me, gnom
Olav Vitters wrote:
> This has been addressed various times. In brief: Advanced buttons do not
> work. They'll be clicked every time. Tweak tool provides a different
> guarantee of stability. For instance: if you change an option in System
> Settings and it results in a bug it must be fixed asap. A
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 01:28:54PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote:
> Christopher Meng writes:
>
> > Somewhat funny that many users even don't know this tweak tool and ask
> > everywhere about this..
>
> I always found it odd that gnome-tweak-tool even exists.. some
> functionality are fou
Jamie Nguyen writes:
> Thanks very much for adding me as a co-maintainer. I guess that you
> probably don't have much time for updating the Tor package, so I'm glad
> to be on board and will be taking a very active role in maintaining the
> package so that you can spend time on other things. I ha
Christopher Meng writes:
> Somewhat funny that many users even don't know this tweak tool and ask
> everywhere about this..
I always found it odd that gnome-tweak-tool even exists.. some
functionality are found in the system settings, some in
gnome-tweak-tool. If you ask me, gnome-tweak-tool
Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 09/02/2013 19:08, Alfredo Kojima a écrit :
>> Whenever we need to use a 3rd party lib that no distribution ships,
>> we're stuck thinking whether it's better to ship it ourselves or just
>> leave out everything, forcing users and packagers to fetch them
>> externally. Can y
On Sunday, February 10, 2013, Samuel Sieb wrote:
＞ As an aside, when I first saw gnome-shell, I thought it would be horrible
to use. But after a while of using it, finding gnome-tweak-tool, and
installing a couple of extensions, I've been quite happy with it. I
actually think it's more keyboard
25 matches
Mail list logo
