On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
> Hi everyboy,
>
> My name is Juerg Haefliger and I'm a software engineer with
> Hewlett-Packard based in Switzerland. Part of my responsibilities is
> building guest images for the HP cloud that runs OpenStack. Although
> we use Ubuntu on b
> - Original Message -
>> From: Peter Robinson
>> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
>> Cc: a...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 6:28 PM
>> Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] FUDCon ARM related followup
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Bruno Wolff III wr
On 01/21/2013 06:30 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
> For the last four hours I was trying to install Fedora 18-64 on the computer
> and for an hour and a half I've been trying to do an install that hasn't
> worked; if was like experiencing Microsoft's "blue screen of death".
> Thankfully after pulli
Hi,
I have had a look at the existing Wayland documentation, but cannot find
anything on running it on Fedora. I am aware of the Fedora packages,
versions, and GIT repositories. I would like to be an early tester and
adopter.
But am wondering how I go about starting you Weston and XWayland in
par
> I believe that fedora-18 can be installed using less [than 511MB] RAM, ...
Yes. I just successfully completed a default install of Gnome3 desktop
from Fedora-18-x86_64-DVD,iso (converted to USB2.0 using livecd-iso-to-disk)
using only the additional kernel boot parameters " mem=383m nomemcheck"
For the last four hours I was trying to install Fedora 18-64 on the
computer and for an hour and a half I've been trying to do an install that
hasn't worked; if was like experiencing Microsoft's "blue screen of death".
Thankfully after pulling out the CD I had 17 installed.
And... um... this isn't
On 01/21/2013 04:37 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> In addition, Anaconda's memory use has been skyrocketing for several
> releases, and the design changes in F18 have done nothing to address that
> issue. (In fact, they likely made it worse.)
That claim is dead wrong, at least for graphical install
...and what are we to do when the screen goes black?
On Jan 20, 2013 2:15 AM, "Muayyad AlSadi" wrote:
> hi,
>
> the fedora's new installer got many innovative features
>
> but it's missing many critical easy to fix final touches from user
> experiance point of view
>
> let me mention some
> I've
Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> the fedora's new installer got many innovative features
>
> but it's missing many critical easy to fix final touches from user
> experiance point of view
And worse, it's got a known bug list longer than Window$ 95's!
The way this was handled is really a catastrophe and sh
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
= Features/ReplaceMySQLwithMariaDB =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> The other poster has referred to the deja-dup documentation but fyi,
> refer to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892063. This is
> partly a fallout of the /tmp on tmpfs default in Fedora 18
Yet another example of how /tmp of tmpfs is a totally braindead and
in
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 23:56:49 -0500,
> Jonathan Masters wrote:
>>
>>
>> We had a number of conversations about how to involve more people in
>> Fedora on ARM. We also had many other conversations that are being minuted
>> on the wiki,
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 20:40 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > No reason why. It's practically the poster child for something that can
> > be fixed with a post-release update, as it by definition only affects
> > post-release configuration. I didn't even bother nominating it as
Ok, I found some time to package up a new dep for freemind 1.0.0.
src-rpm url: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/jortho-0.5-1.fc18.src.rpm
spec url: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/jortho.spec
If it looks ok, I will submit it as a review.
Thanks for any hints on things, which are wrong.
Johannes
O
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Shouldn't be the feature page just deleted? Or archived in some better
> category such as "deferred"? There is 256 (nice number ;) incomplete
> feature pages, some of them are probably abandoned as this one. Would be
> nice to do some cleanup there, to see what is actively work
Adam Williamson wrote:
> No reason why. It's practically the poster child for something that can
> be fixed with a post-release update, as it by definition only affects
> post-release configuration. I didn't even bother nominating it as a
> blocker and it would have been comfortably rejected if it
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:11:39 +0100, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
> I think there's no problem for doing informal reviews, as long as your
> review is ok, the sponsor could just approve it.
Yes, there is no "sponsor must be the first reviewer" rule.
Anyone can post feedback to review requests. Only the s
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 23:56:49 -0500,
Jonathan Masters wrote:
We had a number of conversations about how to involve more people in Fedora on
ARM. We also had many other conversations that are being minuted on the wiki,
with more notes and links to follow. Now is a great time to join arm@
Le 21/01/2013 16:30, Michael J Gruber a écrit :
> I would like to help this poor soul get his package into Fedora:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860249
>
> (adobe-source-code-pro-fonts)
>
> I'm a packager but no sponsor, he's no packager (so needs a sponsor).
> It's not clear to m
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:30:04 +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> I would like to help this poor soul get his package into Fedora:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860249
>
> (adobe-source-code-pro-fonts)
>
> I'm a packager but no sponsor, he's no packager (so needs a sponsor).
> It'
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:30:04 +0100
Michael J Gruber wrote:
> I would like to help this poor soul get his package into Fedora:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860249
>
> (adobe-source-code-pro-fonts)
>
> I'm a packager but no sponsor, he's no packager (so needs a sponsor).
> It's
I would like to help this poor soul get his package into Fedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860249
(adobe-source-code-pro-fonts)
I'm a packager but no sponsor, he's no packager (so needs a sponsor).
It's not clear to me whether I can just make a formal review and ask a
sponsor t
2013/1/21 Stanislav Ochotnicky :
> Quoting Stephen Gallagher (2013-01-18 15:27:30)
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Fri 18 Jan 2013 06:55:26 AM EST, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>> wrote:
>> > Sorry if this is a dumb question, but I cannot find any information.
>> >
Compose started at Mon Jan 21 08:15:11 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[bootconf]
bootconf-1.4-6.fc18.noarch requires grub
[epiphany-extensions]
epiphany-extensions-3.6.0-1.fc19.x86_64 requires epiphany(abi) = 0:3.6
[fawkes
my point was not about my specific case, I have managed to install fedora 18
the point is about to tell the user what he has done wrong and how he
should correct it.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 13:15 +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> > hi,
>
Hello,
After upgrading this box from F18 to Rawhide between yesterday night
and today and tried several times to type my password to no avail, I
realized the system (systemd actually) couldn't load my "fr" keymap.
You can see something like this in the logs:
$ loadkeys fr
unknown keysym
Quoting Stephen Gallagher (2013-01-18 15:27:30)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri 18 Jan 2013 06:55:26 AM EST, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
> wrote:
> > Sorry if this is a dumb question, but I cannot find any information.
> >
> > I would like to have "git rebase ma
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 09:37:37AM +0800, Nick Jones wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 10:11 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> >As the Feature was renamed and the content of Feature has been extended
> >as requested by FESCo, re-announcing it to the community for re-review.
> >
> >See https://fedo
On 01/21/2013 10:39 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 01/20/2013 07:32 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Here's another %doc change:
%doc doc/Users\ guide\ Apache.html
Gets executed as:
+ cp -pr 'doc/Users
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/rubygem-passenger-3.0.19-1.fc19.i386/usr/share/doc/mod_passenger-3.0.1
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 13:15 +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> hi,
>
>
> the fedora's new installer got many innovative features
>
>
> but it's missing many critical easy to fix final touches from user
> experiance point of view
>
>
> let me mention some
>
> I've tried fedora 18 live cd,
>
>
>
On 01/20/2013 07:32 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Here's another %doc change:
%doc doc/Users\ guide\ Apache.html
Gets executed as:
+ cp -pr 'doc/Users
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/rubygem-passenger-3.0.19-1.fc19.i386/usr/share/doc/mod_passenger-3.0.19'
cp: missing destination file operand after '
31 matches
Mail list logo
