Re: OpenImageIO 1.1.3 Build failure in Fedora rawhide

2013-01-14 Thread gil
Il 14/01/2013 21:10, Richard Shaw ha scritto: undefined reference to `OpenImageIO::v1_1::CSHA1::Update(unsigned char const*, unsigned int)' take a look here https://github.com/OpenImageIO/oiio/issues/473 hope it will be useful regards -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2013-01-09)

2013-01-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 18:05 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > GNOME can apply a keyboard config you set via GNOME Control Center > > systemwide, using localectl. I'm not sure KDE, Xfce, LXDE or other > > desktops have any ability to do this, though, so if you're running one >

Re: Problems with Automake 1.13 and 1.13.1

2013-01-14 Thread Kevin Kofler
Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Of course (BTW the Automake maintainer now confirmed to me privately > that he'd accept such a patch), though it would probably would make > sense to put it in Fedora even before 1.13.2. +1 It's time to stop breaking backwards compatibility willy nilly! Kevin Kofle

Re: no audit2allow in f18

2013-01-14 Thread Tom Callaway
On 01/14/2013 03:56 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > SELinux Alert Browser tells me to: > > grep plugin-containe /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M mypol > > I have policycoreutils-python installed, but there's no > /usr/bin/audit2allow in it (as there was in F17). It's in policycoreut

no audit2allow in f18

2013-01-14 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
SELinux Alert Browser tells me to: grep plugin-containe /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M mypol I have policycoreutils-python installed, but there's no /usr/bin/audit2allow in it (as there was in F17). -- Kaleb -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedo

OpenImageIO 1.1.3 Build failure in Fedora rawhide

2013-01-14 Thread Richard Shaw
I'm not sure what's happening since it built fine for rawhide on my local system in mock but it fails on the fedora build server. Here's a snippet from the build log[1]: Building CXX object libOpenImageIO/CMakeFiles/filesystem_test.dir/filesystem_test.cpp.o cd /builddir/build/BUILD/oiio-Release-1

Heads up: nss upade to 3.14 causes git breakage

2013-01-14 Thread Elio Maldonado
Hi all, Please see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895144 and also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893736 I almost sure of what's the cause. Currently testing the proposed fix. Elio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail

Re: Out of date (behind stable) build in testing

2013-01-14 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Sun, 13 Jan 2013 20:55:16 -0600 Bruno Wolff III escribió: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:30:19 -0700, >Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > >I'll untag it manually. > > If I had manually untagged it, would that have done the trick? I > wasn't sure if that

Re: Coordinating libffi upgrade

2013-01-14 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:04:29 -0400 Adam Jackson escribió: > On 11/2/12 3:18 PM, Anthony Green wrote: > > Several months ago I attempted to upgrade libffi 3.0.10 to 3.0.11. > > The change was reverted because the soname change in this version of > > th

[Bug 825678] Starting SDL on console framebuffer segfaults

2013-01-14 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825678 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #678316|0 |1 is obsolete|

libarchive soname bump

2013-01-14 Thread Tomas Bzatek
FYI, libarchive-3.1.1 has just been released and involves soname version bump. This is a heads-up that I will be pushing it to rawhide soon, probably tomorrow. Still checking for API breakage. I'll also rebuild all affected packages according to the list below. $ repoquery --whatrequires --allde

Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-4.8.0-0.1.fc19

2013-01-14 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:32:09AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:40:27PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > The remaining packages, that failed to build with 4.8.0-0.1 > > and succeeded with 4.7.2-9 are listed below. 67 of these look > > like issues on the package side, 22

Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-4.8.0-0.1.fc19

2013-01-14 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:40:27PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > As part of preparations for possible switch of system compiler in F19 > to GCC 4.8.0, we (myself and Marek Polacek) have performed a test mass > rebuild of rawhide (December 17th package list) using gcc-4.8.0-0.1.fc19 >

Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-4.8.0-0.1.fc19

2013-01-14 Thread Florian Weimer
On 01/04/2013 09:40 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: The remaining packages, that failed to build with 4.8.0-0.1 and succeeded with 4.7.2-9 are listed below. 67 of these look like issues on the package side, 22 gcc bugs that were supposedly fixed by now upstream and thus should be ok in 4.8.0-0.3 when

Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-4.8.0-0.1.fc19

2013-01-14 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 06:08:21PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On 2013-01-04 22:40, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > gcc-4.8.0-0.1.fc19 on x86_64 > > I see this in git, but not even a scratch build in koji. Is a build of > the 4.8.0 gcc and friends available somewhere? What about the build logs > of t

Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-4.8.0-0.1.fc19

2013-01-14 Thread Ville Skyttä
On 2013-01-04 22:40, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > gcc-4.8.0-0.1.fc19 on x86_64 I see this in git, but not even a scratch build in koji. Is a build of the 4.8.0 gcc and friends available somewhere? What about the build logs of the failed packages? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org htt

Re: Problems with Automake 1.13 and 1.13.1

2013-01-14 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 14/01/2013 16:10, Stephen Gallagher ha scritto: >> Choices are: >> >> 1) introducing automake-1.12: I believe distros should agree on _not_ >> introducing an automake-1.12 or similar package and get the Automake >> maintainer to fix his mess. >> >> 2) fixing all packages individually: sounds lik

Fwd: [Libjpeg-turbo-users] jpeg-9, API/ABI compatibility, and the future role of this project

2013-01-14 Thread Xose Vazquez Perez
hi, As Fedora was pioneering in the libjpeg-turbo inclusion maybe you are interested in this discussion. http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=50E4AF86.50203%40users.sourceforge.net&forum_name=libjpeg-turbo-users Original Message Subject: [Libjpeg-turbo-users

Re: Problems with Automake 1.13 and 1.13.1

2013-01-14 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon 14 Jan 2013 09:52:39 AM EST, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > As of the original 1.13 release two macros where removed from Automake: > AM_PROG_CC_STDC (replaced by AC_PROG_CC as provided by autoconf) and > AM_CONFIG_HEADER (replaced by AC_CONFIG_HEADERS)

Problems with Automake 1.13 and 1.13.1

2013-01-14 Thread Paolo Bonzini
As of the original 1.13 release two macros where removed from Automake: AM_PROG_CC_STDC (replaced by AC_PROG_CC as provided by autoconf) and AM_CONFIG_HEADER (replaced by AC_CONFIG_HEADERS). These were later reintroduced in 1.13.1, but not with the original behavior---they just give an error messag

rawhide report: 20130114 changes

2013-01-14 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Jan 14 08:15:06 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [bootconf] bootconf-1.4-6.fc18.noarch requires grub [ember] ember-0.6.3-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libOgreMain.so.1.7.4()(64bit) [epiphany-extensions]

Re: Orphaned package: ushare

2013-01-14 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 19:24 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > On Ter, 2013-01-08 at 17:05 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > > Nothing's using this in F18, and upstream is very much dormant. I don't > > want to maintain it and I'd honestly prefer people use gupnp, so I'm > > tossing ushare to the w