# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2012-12-17
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again tomorrow. We're in full-on F18 final mode at
this point - let's just do what
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 22:00 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 21:15 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Björn Persson
> > wrote:
> > Except for Yum, which has for years been the only method that
> > was both
> > se
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 21:15 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Björn Persson
> wrote:
> Except for Yum, which has for years been the only method that
> was both
> secure and practical anyway, but I agree. As long as people
> are
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Björn Persson
wrote:
> Except for Yum, which has for years been the only method that was both
> secure and practical anyway, but I agree. As long as people are being
> discouraged from upgrading by Yum because it's "unsupported", removing
> the only "supported" and
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> So unless that feature is marked as a blocker, we would be releasing
> Fedora 18 with no secure method to upgrade to it. That seems
> irresponsible.
Except for Yum, which has for years been the only method that was both
secure and practical anyway, but I agree. As long as
Hi
> fedup is supposed to support media upgrades yes.
>
At this point, fedup doesn't
" --iso ISO[TODO] installation image file"
So unless that feature is marked as a blocker, we would be releasing Fedora
18 with no secure method to upgrade to it. That seems irresponsible.
Rahul
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>>
>> Isn't it not a regression because _Anaconda_ never verified the source?
>>
>> (That is, good old bug #998.)
>
>
> I am aware of that bug but then media based upgrades have always been
> supported as a workaround. Is that still th
Hi
> Isn't it not a regression because _Anaconda_ never verified the source?
>
> (That is, good old bug #998.)
>
I am aware of that bug but then media based upgrades have always been
supported as a workaround. Is that still the case?
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
On 12/14/12 10:04 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> Dne 13.12.2012 22:52, Eric Sandeen napsal(a):
>> I just spent too many hours re-triaging and re-discovering bug
>> 851970, in which systemd + PrivateTmp does weird things with
>> namespaces, thereby making it impossible to unmount filesystems under
>> c
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877623
>
> Why was this rejected as a blocker? Even if one considers that it isn't a
> regression compared to PreUpgrade, the situation has changed now that
> Anaconda itself doesn't provid
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 03:03:27PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877623
> Why was this rejected as a blocker? Even if one considers that it
> isn't a regression compared to PreUpgrade, the situation has changed
> now that Anaconda itself doesn't provide
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Tom London wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>>
>> and performance (blt and blending, cairo-demos) is way better than the
>> 2.20.10 and 2.20.14 releases.
>>
>> -Ilyes
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>>>
>
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>
> and performance (blt and blending, cairo-demos) is way better than the
> 2.20.10 and 2.20.14 releases.
>
> -Ilyes
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just testing the 2.20.16 release and everything look
On 12/13/2012 04:38 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
1 - Here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Input_device_configuration#system-setup-keyboard
we need update this because:
Command system-setup-keyboard is not present in F18, now we got
localectl set-x11-keymap
For each of these suggestions, pleas
On 12/10/2012 05:39 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
Which is why I think it would be in every ones best interest if all
the RHEL clones ( even oracle ) would unite join our community
maintain and support Fedora LTS release instead risk being bitten by
any business decision Red Hat either wil
Hi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877623
Why was this rejected as a blocker? Even if one considers that it isn't
a regression compared to PreUpgrade, the situation has changed now that
Anaconda itself doesn't provide any upgrade method directly.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
deve
Compose started at Sun Dec 16 09:16:47 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[marble]
1:python-marble-4.9.4-1.fc18.x86_64 requires sip-api(8) >= 0:8.1
[python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure]
python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastru
Compose started at Sun Dec 16 08:15:11 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[Agda]
Agda-2.3.0.1-4.fc19.x86_64 requires
ghc(Agda-2.3.0.1-ad754944fc95f11aa3b4710387ff959a)
[ansible]
ansible-fireball-0.9-1.fc19.noarch requires pyt
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > spring-91.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
>
> Failed to build, but not my fault:
>
> /lib64/libIrrXML.so.1: undefined reference to
> `irr::core::LOCALE_DECIMAL_POINTS'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>
> Everything else rebuilt fine.
>
Oh,
and performance (blt and blending, cairo-demos) is way better than the
2.20.10 and 2.20.14 releases.
-Ilyes
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just testing the 2.20.16 release and everything looks good so far on GM45.
>
> -Ilyes
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:28 AM
Hi,
Just testing the 2.20.16 release and everything looks good so far on GM45.
-Ilyes
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Dom, 2012-12-16 at 01:10 +0200, Ebru Arslan wrote:
> > I am using 32 bit Fedora 14 . our platform is Adlink cPCI-3970D and
> > this platform using In
these driver is using kernel file (like header etc) if i use Fedora 17,
they are not working.
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Dom, 2012-12-16 at 01:46 +0200, Ebru Arslan wrote:
> > I am using Adlink cPCI 3970D board. and my system also include cPCI
> > 3455 driver compa
22 matches
Mail list logo
