commit 8dc5e42e94ec4dbbf0e02c2be4143617d13fb725
Author: Robin Lee
Date: Wed Dec 12 11:21:43 2012 +0800
Update to 1.9
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Net-Dropbox-API.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff
Hi Rich,
On 07.12.2012 18:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Well this is a more general question about virtualization. I agree
that it's sometimes more convenient to use an external kernel and
initrd to boot a guest, and libvirt supports this mode (see the
and in libvirt XML). But:
We are usi
2012/12/11 David Malcolm :
> A while back I ran my static checker on all of the Python extension
> modules in Fedora 17:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/StaticAnalysisOfPythonRefcounts
>
> I wrote various scripts to build the packages in a mock environment that
> injects my checker into
On 11 December 2012 18:20, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Eric H. Christensen wrote:
>> This is a good point. Unfortunately this would lead to the only option
>> being to remove fop and Publican from EPEL5 because fop is broken...
>> badly.
>>
>> If no one needs it then I'll just retire it.
>
> Uh, I don'
Eric H. Christensen wrote:
> This is a good point. Unfortunately this would lead to the only option
> being to remove fop and Publican from EPEL5 because fop is broken...
> badly.
>
> If no one needs it then I'll just retire it.
Uh, I don't think it's possible to retire shipped packages. (At leas
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, inode0 wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Benjamin Lewis wrote:
There is really no reason why the election messages couldn't go to all
of FAS, and just have a note explaining that you need cla_done to vote.
There is equally no reason, aside from it being more admin w
On Sex, 2012-09-21 at 01:14 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:48:34AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 04:44:48PM +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 23:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > So instead of /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf
* Fernando Nasser [11/12/2012 23:05] :
>
> As we have EPEL _for_ RHEL we can have things _for_ Fedora as opposed
> to _in_ Fedora. It is how several VARs do with their software _for_
> RHEL in the Red Hat world.
We already have third party repositories for Fedora.
Emmanuel
--
devel mailing list
On Ter, 2012-12-11 at 14:04 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 02:02:57PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 05:15:46PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Seg, 2012-12-10 at 09:05 +0100, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 01:38:43PM +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Quoting Eric H. Christensen (2012-12-10 22:51:11)
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > The last week or so has seen a couple of patches going into fop in
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 12/11/2012 02:41 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> commit 8949ba49ab66e8642a38087fd19217dabc4f117b
>> Author: Peter Robinson
>> Date: Tue Dec 11 21:40:52 2012 +
>>
>> Build with -fpic on 32 bit too. Use -fpic on supported platf
On 12/11/2012 02:41 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
commit 8949ba49ab66e8642a38087fd19217dabc4f117b
Author: Peter Robinson
Date: Tue Dec 11 21:40:52 2012 +
Build with -fpic on 32 bit too. Use -fpic on supported platforms over -fPIC
g2clib.spec | 15 +--
1 files changed, 1
A while back I ran my static checker on all of the Python extension
modules in Fedora 17:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/StaticAnalysisOfPythonRefcounts
I wrote various scripts to build the packages in a mock environment that
injects my checker into gcc, then wrote various scripts to tri
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 03:18:42PM -0500, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> > From: "Richard W.M. Jones"
> > So let's say the user has to add the OCaml repo themselves. That's
> > difficult for the user because lots of tools like "yum search" no
> > longer work well.
> >
>
> Really? If I add several yu
Hi all,
As we have EPEL _for_ RHEL we can have things _for_ Fedora as opposed
to _in_ Fedora. It is how several VARs do with their software _for_
RHEL in the Red Hat world.
Some years ago JPackage.org had a yum repo with JBoss AS (community
version) that was tailored to be installed in Fedora.
see in line
- Original Message -
> From: "Richard W.M. Jones"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 2:33:13 PM
> Subject: Re: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 01:02:41PM -0500, J
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 01:02:41PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> I'd love LSB to matter more. But I didn't raise that can of worms
> intentionally :) To drill down to a single point though, as I said
> above, I don't want the distro to ship every piece of software I might
> use. Today, there is too m
On 12/11/2012 01:09 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Yeah, our "how to join Fedora" process makes it easiest to start by
adding to the number of packages instead of by adding to the quality
of existing packages. It might be beneficial to have things the other
way - if someone could find a practical way
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> I'd love LSB to matter more. But I didn't raise that can of worms
> intentionally :) To drill down to a single point though, as I said
> above, I don't want the distro to ship every piece of software I might
> use. Today, there is too much of a
On 12/09/2012 03:32 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Having one repo and refusing commercial software are 2 different issues.
Really, they're not though. The problem is that stuff is shipped
in-distro and builds deps on core packages, and those packages are
revved in a symbiotic relationship with t
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 08:29:52 -0500,
Martin Preisler wrote:
Hi,
I want to push Ogre 1.8.1 into rawhide next week. This will most likely break some packages
but we have a lots and lots of time to fix it all up in rawhide. The changes in Ogre API
aren't extensive enough for this to be a rea
Greetings.
Fedora 18 is entering final change freeze. There will be one more push
to stable at 23:59:59 UTC tonight that will appear in tomorrow's
branched compose.
Newly Submitted updates will land in updates-testing after being
pushed. Only updates that fix accepted blocker and accepted NTH bu
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> inode0 wrote:
>> People working on the elections certainly try to make the community
>> aware of the elections. Unfortunately we never seem to be able to get
>> everyone's attention.
>
> One issue is that the voting period is just too short. T
Mattia Verga wrote:
> Now my problem is: how can I make a working build in F18 and Rawhide? Is
> there any way to force the use of udisks1 in my package, or it's a
> choice that can only be made in kdelibs?
The choice can only be made in kdelibs.
We need to fix the udisks2 backend, it's the only
inode0 wrote:
> People working on the elections certainly try to make the community
> aware of the elections. Unfortunately we never seem to be able to get
> everyone's attention.
One issue is that the voting period is just too short. This time, I found
out about the elections 6-7 minutes after t
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Benjamin Lewis wrote:
> There is really no reason why the election messages couldn't go to all
> of FAS, and just have a note explaining that you need cla_done to vote.
>
> There is equally no reason, aside from it being more admin work, why you
> couldn't have two
Hi Davide -
dblistsub-fedora wrote:
> [...] I am considering using one of the above to see if they can
> usefully substitute the practice of peppering code with tracing
> statements (logging or performance analysis are not the focus). As I
> would be a beginner in any of them, I was curious ab
Hot problems:
ID Components Count
---
121163 kernel 344
118396 kernel 316
100107 gnome-packagekit 204
1177
Compose started at Tue Dec 11 09:15:41 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure]
python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure-0.0.3-1.fc18.noarch requires
fedmsg >= 0:0.6.1
Broken deps for i386
Quoting Eric H. Christensen (2012-12-10 22:51:11)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The last week or so has seen a couple of patches going into fop in the Fedora
> repositories. I recently became a co-maintainer of fop in EPEL5 and was
> trying to bring fop into current ther
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 11:42 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/10/2012 04:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
c) how do you define 'contributor' ?
Active fas account...
So cla_done as it's requir
- Original Message -
> On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 11:42 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > > On 12/10/2012 04:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > c) how do you define 'contributor' ?
> > >
> > > Active fas account...
> >
> > So cla_done as it's requirement for ele
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 13:56 -0800, Richard Vickery wrote:
Fedora don't conduct election business of any sort via email. But since
email is probably the #1 means of communication within the Fedora
project, elections are *publicised* via email (as well a
On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 18:21:43 +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> I can only say that at
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
> 23 steps are shown under "Becoming a Fedora Package Collection Maintainer".
>
> Some of them are technical and more or less unavoidable (
34 matches
Mail list logo
