On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 20:13 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 11/26/2012 06:29 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> Why does it matter? Their code hasn't changed, and has not become
> GPLv3. The package is GPLv3+.
If the license of libraw changed significantly, the libraw package
should be updated
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 02:48:00 +0100, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> But these are just implementation. Ideally we want every package that gets
> released to the users to have a maintainer that is watching bug reports and
> attempting to fix anything serious.
There are serious bugs so that some cases are
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:44:24 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 26.11.12 11:23, Mat Booth (fed...@matbooth.co.uk) wrote:
> > On 24 November 2012 07:40, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > as elfutils package is going to contain unwinder in its next release
> > > orphaning
> > > th
- Original Message -
> From: "Alexander Aristotle Davis"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 8:03:17 PM
> Subject: need help with a package
>
> Hi,
>
> A package called rssh has been marked as duplicate on Bugzilla and I
> am
> working on a 2.3.3 versi
On Nov 26, 2012 8:22 AM, "Jan Kratochvil" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:00:17 +0100, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > If perf winds up getting stuck relying on an orphaned library for some
> > non-trivial amount of time,
>
> AFAIK that is common in Fedora there are orphaned libraries in use for
> a rele
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:08:22PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> python-offtrac
I'll take this one!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
A package called rssh has been marked as duplicate on Bugzilla and I am
working on a 2.3.3 version and would like to update it to a new
release. Could you please inform me why this package have been orphaned.
I am not a packager; I am seeking a sponsor to help me review the file.
Thank
On Mon, 26.11.12 11:23, Mat Booth (fed...@matbooth.co.uk) wrote:
> On 24 November 2012 07:40, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as elfutils package is going to contain unwinder in its next release
> > orphaning
> > the libunwind library.
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/nam
Hi folks,
A gentle reminder that the FESCo town hall session for the F19 elections
is at 1700UTC on November 27[1][2]. It's a good chance to question the
candidates[3] before you cast your votes at the ballot.
I hope to see you there.
More information on the elections can be found here[3].
PS:
Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) said:
> > > I see that initscripts in F18 ships this udev rule:
> > >
> > > ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", PROGRAM="/lib/udev/rename_device",
> > > RESULT=="?*", ENV{INTERFACE_NAME}="$result"
> > >
> > > I'm trying to tackle some problems related to interface ren
On 11/26/2012 06:29 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
Why does it matter? Their code hasn't changed, and has not become GPLv3.
The package is GPLv3+.
>>>
>>> It matters because Shotwell links to GStreamer.
>>>
>>> GStreamer applications either opt for LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+ with exceptions
>>> beca
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 11/22/2012 10:07 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 18:15:26 GMT, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Panu Matilainen <
>>> pmati...@laiskiainen.org> wrote:
>>>
-- Build files have been writte
Once upon a time, Ralf Corsepius said:
> Well, dlopen'ed modules/plugins aren't directly linked, i.e. there is
> only an indirect dependency. AFAICT (IANAL), this is what makes the
> legal key-difference.
IANAL either, but neither is what matters in the legal sense; "derived
work" is what matte
Dne 26/11/12 16:29, Benjamin Kreuter napsal(a):
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am trying to follow the procedure here:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages
>
> But I cannot set the fedora-cvs flag. Am I missing some sort of
> permissi
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 14:08 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 17:51 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as nmcli doesn't yet offer all functionality s-c-network-tui had for
> > configuring networks on the command line, I want to resurrect
> > system-config-network for
On 11/26/2012 07:54 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:40:10PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I am not familiar with gstreamer's internals, but AFAIIK, these
plugins aren't linked, but "dlopen'ed".
Otherwise these "plugins" would not be "plugins" ;)
The difference is an impl
On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 17:51 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as nmcli doesn't yet offer all functionality s-c-network-tui had for
> configuring networks on the command line, I want to resurrect
> system-config-network for the time being, i.e. until nmcli (or other
> tools) fill the gaps. I
On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 17:51 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as nmcli doesn't yet offer all functionality s-c-network-tui had for
> configuring networks on the command line, I want to resurrect
> system-config-network for the time being, i.e. until nmcli (or other
> tools) fill the gaps. I
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:40:10PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> I am not familiar with gstreamer's internals, but AFAIIK, these
> plugins aren't linked, but "dlopen'ed".
>
> Otherwise these "plugins" would not be "plugins" ;)
The difference is an implementation detail, and so depending on it f
On 11/26/2012 07:29 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
Why does it matter? Their code hasn't changed, and has not become GPLv3.
The package is GPLv3+.
It matters because Shotwell links to GStreamer.
GStreamer applications either opt for LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+ with exceptions
because they might end up using p
>>> Why does it matter? Their code hasn't changed, and has not become GPLv3.
>>> The package is GPLv3+.
>>
>> It matters because Shotwell links to GStreamer.
>>
>> GStreamer applications either opt for LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+ with exceptions
>> because they might end up using proprietary or otherwise
On 11/26/2012 04:26 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
>>> If that is the case, then has Yorba been notified of that? I doubt they
>>> would suddenly want their code to become GPLv3 instead of LGPLv2+.
>>
>> Why does it matter? Their code hasn't changed, and has not become GPLv3.
>> The package is GPLv3+
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 15:38 +, Mat Booth wrote:
> On 26 November 2012 13:10, Fedora Rawhide Report
> wrote:
> >
> > - no need to drop upstream commits patch as some twat blew it away
>
> Bonus expletives today!
Hahaha such way with words.
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"Best little tow
>> If that is the case, then has Yorba been notified of that? I doubt they
>> would suddenly want their code to become GPLv3 instead of LGPLv2+.
>
> Why does it matter? Their code hasn't changed, and has not become
> GPLv3. The package is GPLv3+.
It matters because Shotwell links to GStreamer.
commit f25f6ff74216d238ab8da2af024b1319465e83f7
Author: Bill Pemberton
Date: Mon Nov 26 11:21:53 2012 -0500
Update to 0.801
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Rose-DB-Object.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
di
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Rose-DB-Object:
acd603db13869672f018268802558bfb Rose-DB-Object-0.801.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
On 11/26/2012 10:14 AM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> I came across what looks like a possible licensing issue with LibRaw and
> applications that link to it. I am not totally sure that there is a problem,
> but I have enough reason to have doubts. I welcome any clarifications and
> advice.
>
> LibRaw'
On 11/25/12 1:46 PM, darrell pfeifer wrote:
> Last night on my rawhide laptop I installed
>
> kernel 3.7.0-0.rc6.git4.1.fc19.
>
> Upon reboot I got a grub shell prompt. Turns out my /boot was empty.
Are you sure it was properly mounted, and you weren't just looking at the empty
mountpoint?
-Er
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879963
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Rose-DB-0.770-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Rose-DB-0.770-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
commit 986b9b0cbdcd7ceeace3f7000af22d52ff9dca25
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Mon Nov 26 17:07:41 2012 +0100
Buildrequire perl(Cwd), simplify filters
perl-IO-Tty.spec | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-IO-Tty.spec b/perl-IO-Tty.spec
ind
On Nov 26, 2012 7:39 AM, "Richard Hughes" wrote:
>
> On 26 November 2012 15:19, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Imo, the Obsoletes/Provides should only go in the new and sepearate -qt
> > package
>
> Sure, that's somewhat easier. Something like:
>
> Obsoletes: PackageKit-qt < 0.8.6
> Provides: PackageKit-q
On 26 November 2012 15:19, Rex Dieter wrote:
> I'll help with the review, if still needed.
Yes please, all help very welcome. I want to get the new version of PK
into F18 if possible, as it's got quite a few nice fixes that people
want.
> Imo, the Obsoletes/Provides should only go in the new and
On 26 November 2012 13:10, Fedora Rawhide Report
wrote:
>
> - no need to drop upstream commits patch as some twat blew it away
Bonus expletives today!
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
Hi everyone,
I am trying to follow the procedure here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages
But I cannot set the fedora-cvs flag. Am I missing some sort of
permissions? What should I do?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Benjamin R Kreuter
U
commit 0d2419553c088d4164ededed82eabd87b1ffd494
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Mon Nov 26 16:27:33 2012 +0100
1.79 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-XML-LibXSLT.spec |8 +---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.giti
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-LibXSLT:
92dfd4188353d50f0aa1f848f379914f XML-LibXSLT-1.79.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
Summary of changes:
f3696b6... Update to 0.770 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
Richard Hughes wrote:
> I'm here asking advice. PackageKit used to ship subpackages of
> PackageKit-glib, PackageKit-glib-devel, PackageKit-qt, and
> PackageKit-qt-devel amoung others.
>
> Upstream PackageKit-Qt has been split out into another separate
> project as it had different API and ABI pr
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:00:52AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:34:35AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >> >> > If perf winds up getting stuck relying on an orphaned li
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876974
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CGI-3.52-218.fc17,perl-5.14.3-218.fc17 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-3.52-218.fc17,perl-5.14.3-218.fc17
--
You
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:34:35AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> >> > If perf winds up getting stuck relying on an orphaned library for some
>> >> > non-trivial amount of time,
>> >>
>> >> AFAIK
commit 38bc297279c2040a428e65be7e6f28e4e7c8ce2c
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Mon Nov 26 15:45:24 2012 +0100
0.48 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-GitHub.spec | 11 ---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.git
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-GitHub:
024925e1df996838ca8dd6ae518afac3 Net-GitHub-0.48.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:34:35AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >> > If perf winds up getting stuck relying on an orphaned library for some
> >> > non-trivial amount of time,
> >>
> >> AFAIK that is common in Fedora there are orphaned libraries in
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> > If perf winds up getting stuck relying on an orphaned library for some
>> > non-trivial amount of time,
>>
>> AFAIK that is common in Fedora there are orphaned libraries in use for
>> a release or two.
>>
>>
>> > I'd rather just turn off libun
Hot problems:
ID Components Count
---
90599 kernel 406
91614 kernel 303
90633 gnome-packagekit 212
924
commit 2e05079f215ab2f2c3a9d804461f780c8274a728
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Mon Nov 26 15:02:09 2012 +0100
3.52 bump to fix CVE-2012-5526
.gitignore |1 +
...n_cookies.patch => CGI-3.51-CVE-2012-5526.patch |0
perl-CGI.spec
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:22:08PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:00:17 +0100, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > So are you not orphaning libunwind until that is merged into the
> > upstream kernel?
>
> To get the terminology right:
> I am 'orphaning' it now. Later it may be 'obsolsted
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:22:08 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:00:17 +0100, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > So are you not orphaning libunwind until that is merged into the
> > upstream kernel?
>
> To get the terminology right:
> I am 'orphaning' it now. Later it may be 'obsolsted'.
Pr
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:00:17 +0100, Josh Boyer wrote:
> So are you not orphaning libunwind until that is merged into the
> upstream kernel?
To get the terminology right:
I am 'orphaning' it now. Later it may be 'obsolsted'.
If I should keep it formally maintaining I could. But factically it won
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:23:16 +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
>> Won't you need to retire it when elfutils obsoletes it?
>
> The development is not yet at that point, it may happen later:
>
> (1) elfutils needs to integrate it and get released first
I'm here asking advice. PackageKit used to ship subpackages of
PackageKit-glib, PackageKit-glib-devel, PackageKit-qt, and
PackageKit-qt-devel amoung others.
Upstream PackageKit-Qt has been split out into another separate
project as it had different API and ABI promises to PackageKit-glib
and it wa
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:23:16 +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
> Won't you need to retire it when elfutils obsoletes it?
The development is not yet at that point, it may happen later:
(1) elfutils needs to integrate it and get released first (January/February),
being worked on with Mark Wielaard:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Caterpillar wrote:
> Il 23/11/2012 15:33, Johannes Lips ha scritto:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am looking for a new freemind maintainer. I've stated the reason for
>> this in this mail to java-devel:
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2012-November/0045
You're asking for something very open-ended, and which is not even
possible to implement in general -- what if the inspecting operating
system is Linux, and the inspected operating system needs custom Mac OS X
libraries?
In any case, the correct place to request this is with the SCAP
standards tea
Won't you need to retire it when elfutils obsoletes it?
On 24 November 2012 07:40, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as elfutils package is going to contain unwinder in its next release orphaning
> the libunwind library.
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/libunwind
>
>
> Jan
> --
On 11/25/2012 05:12 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:43:01AM +0100, Simon Lukasik wrote:
>> On 11/22/2012 09:07 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:52:30PM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Interpreters do not preclude simple data: they just sca
Hi,
I have retired mod_auth_shadow for F18 and anything newer. Package will be
blocked (hopefully soon, ticket for this was raised to rel-eng).
If there is somebody who wants to maintain this, please go ahead and pick
ownership in PKGDB.
Reason for retirement is that upstream is dead (no working
p any documentation, F17 update pushes etc that may
be needed.
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20121126
The current proposed agenda is included below.
== Proposed Agenda Topics
Il 23/11/2012 15:33, Johannes Lips ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking for a new freemind maintainer. I've stated the reason for
> this in this mail to java-devel:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2012-November/004561.html
>
> Perhaps someone would like to take over...
>
> J
I came across what looks like a possible licensing issue with LibRaw and
applications that link to it. I am not totally sure that there is a problem,
but I have enough reason to have doubts. I welcome any clarifications and
advice.
LibRaw's License tag was changed from "LGPLv2 or CDDL" to GPLv3 wh
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL:
a8a68e432e02d58a67c3e99742c07f83 IO-Socket-SSL-1.79.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
> This is what I get for the last few days:
> # yum --skip-broken update
This is a fairly common scenario. Let me explain..
Repository cachecookie was older than 6 hours,
Yum updates the metalink.xml file:
> updates/17/x86_64/metalink | 16 kB 00:00
The repomd.xml timestamp stored in metal
63 matches
Mail list logo
