Hey all,
The Fedora 18 Virt Test Day is this Thursday, November 1st. That's two days
away! The test day landing page is here (still being expanded):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-11-01_Virtualization
If you're interested in trying out some new virt functionality, we've got
step by
On 10/30/2012 02:58 PM, David Airlie wrote:
Should we just skip F18? (like seriously).
Seems a little over the top. Why not use the extra time to squash other
bugs, making F18 a better release overall?
--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / b...@redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fe
Hi folks,
Would any one want to swap reviews with me? I'd like to get this one
reviewed:
xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file
format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871629
I'll be happy to review a package in return.
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur: "F
- Original Message -
> From: "Richard Hughes"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, 31 October, 2012 6:35:14 AM
> Subject: Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how
> to install into a LVM partitions (or
> RAID))
>
> On 30 O
Il giorno mar, 30/10/2012 alle 10.40 -0700, Adam Williamson ha scritto:
> You indicated at the start of this side-thread that you wanted to use
> an existing partition without re-formatting it. You can do so just
> fine with TC6 or other Beta builds. If you re-use a partition in TC6
> it will be re
On 30 October 2012 18:45, Adam Williamson wrote:
> so if were to try and switch back to oldui at
> this point, we'd have to go through the whole process of adjusting the
> code for the changes to dracut again, quite apart from any other issues.
I don't understand how fixing up the old anaconda wi
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:45:02AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 19:32 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
I don't know if it's impossible to revert to the F17 anaconda at this
time, however it is clear that F18 is going to be the
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:45:02AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 19:32 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
>
> > I don't know if it's impossible to revert to the F17 anaconda at this
> > time, however it is clear that F18 is going to be the longest release
> > cycle we had in 9 y
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #932 F18 Features - progress at Feature
On 10/30/2012 03:25 PM, Chandler Wilkerson wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> My name is Chandler Wilkerson and I'm a long time Redhat/Fedora user,
> admin, and in the last few years at my current job, I've become an RHCE,
> an RHN satellite admin, and then an RHCA.
>
> My motivation on getting into Fedora
Hello all,
My name is Chandler Wilkerson and I'm a long time Redhat/Fedora user,
admin, and in the last few years at my current job, I've become an RHCE,
an RHN satellite admin, and then an RHCA.
My motivation on getting into Fedora packaging is to help maintaining
the AlienArena package, as
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 19:32 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
>
>> I don't know if it's impossible to revert to the F17 anaconda at this
>> time, however it is clear that F18 is going to be the longest release
>> cycle we had in 9 years and som
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> It's time somebody asked this, so ...
>
> Adam Williamson writes:
>> What is missing from TC6 and will be added in the next build is the
>> ability to choose to reformat the partition. If you do not want to
>> reformat it, this is not a problem f
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 19:32 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> I don't know if it's impossible to revert to the F17 anaconda at this
> time, however it is clear that F18 is going to be the longest release
> cycle we had in 9 years and somehow we need to avoid this in the
> future.
It's not impossibl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871503
--- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> it seems that perl only Provides /usr/bin/perl
Correct.
> well, if ANY package has Require: /bin/perl and is updated the same time as
> perl depsolve in yum fails, you can satifsy
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I'd recommend asking dcantrell, as he has some good points on this
> topic. I broadly agree with him that it might well be more or less
> impossible to smoothly handle a major rewrite of anaconda in our current
> development process. CCing
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 14:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It's time somebody asked this, so ...
>
> Adam Williamson writes:
> > What is missing from TC6 and will be added in the next build is the
> > ability to choose to reformat the partition. If you do not want to
> > reformat it, this is not a prob
It's time somebody asked this, so ...
Adam Williamson writes:
> What is missing from TC6 and will be added in the next build is the
> ability to choose to reformat the partition. If you do not want to
> reformat it, this is not a problem for you.
It appears to me that anaconda is months away fro
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 08:17 +0100, Dario Lesca wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 29/10/2012 alle 17.09 -0700, Adam Williamson ha scritto:
> > That ability has been added since Beta TC6.
>
> ok, I'll wait a version > TC-6
Sigh. Apparently I _still_ wasn't clear enough.
You indicated at the start of this si
On 10/30/2012 02:44 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 30/10/2012 15:14, Remi Collet a écrit :
So I open a tracker bug for this issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871373
Finally : 60 open bugs.
Note : if your package provides an Apache con
Summary of changes:
9981bcf... Upstream update. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 30/10/2012 15:14, Remi Collet a écrit :
> So I open a tracker bug for this issues
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871373
Finally : 60 open bugs.
Note : if your package provides an Apache configuration file
and is not listed here, I
Summary of changes:
9981bcf... Upstream update. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 18 Beta.
Thursday, November 01, 2012 @17:00 UTC (13:00 EDT/10:00 PDT/18:00 CET)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine
Summary of changes:
f65416d... 1.38 bump (*)
753c76a... Disable optional tests on RHEL >= 7 (*)
d078c56... 1.39 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing l
commit d078c568a15ea2a86bc68a05b84b8ccba939389b
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Tue Oct 30 15:11:19 2012 +0100
1.39 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Log-Log4perl.spec | 10 +++---
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Log-Log4perl:
541d7ac477590b8ccbd04993b0f23120 Log-Log4perl-1.39.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Testing some packages in Fedora 18, I noticed that lot of
configuration for httpd have not be fixed for new version 2.4.
So I open a tracker bug for this issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871373
Currently I have filed ~40 bugs,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871428
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||871373
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871428
Bug ID: 871428
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: 18
Priority: unspecified
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
A
Compose started at Tue Oct 30 09:15:29 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[dhcp-forwarder]
dhcp-forwarder-upstart-0.10-1801.fc18.noarch requires /sbin/initctl
[dnf]
dnf-0.2.14-2.git4831982.fc18.noarch requires python-hawkey >=
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 18:59 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> I am currently working on adding this software to Fedora:
> https://github.com/hroncok/SPECS/
This is great! I would try to help on that. We have a Makerbot and soon
a RepRap at the local Hackerspace we can use for testing, and an
Ultimaker
On 30/10/12 09:00, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
I'm working in a package which ships a udev rule in /lib/udev/rules.d
I haven't seen any guidelines about this, and I wonder if I must do a
udevadm control --reload in %post
You shouldn't need to, no, because udev watches the rules directories
with
Hello,
I'm working in a package which ships a udev rule in /lib/udev/rules.d
I haven't seen any guidelines about this, and I wonder if I must do a
udevadm control --reload in %post
I have checked other packages with udev rules but this command is not
issued, is this correct?
Any suggestion?
--
d
Il giorno lun, 29/10/2012 alle 17.09 -0700, Adam Williamson ha scritto:
> That ability has been added since Beta TC6.
ok, I'll wait a version > TC-6
Thanks to all
--
Dario Lesca - sip:da...@solinos.it
(Inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 17 Gnome3)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
35 matches
Mail list logo
