On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 07:21:40AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 23.10.2012 17:21, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> >>Once you introduce version into the name, you will never be able to
> >>get rid of it, although puppet 4 might be 100% compatible with
> >That's not true. In the future, puppet can obs
On 10/22/12 10:42, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
>
>> I haven't been able to get a lot of traction with this, but I figured a
>> shot at this mailing list might help.
>>
>> I have written a patch against the Fedora 18 version of vpnc-script to
>> allow it to
Le 23/10/2012 23:02, Nathanael D. Noblet a écrit :
> I presume php-pecl packages are un-affected by this?
Right.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Dne 23.10.2012 17:21, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
Once you introduce version into the name, you will never be able to
get rid of it, although puppet 4 might be 100% compatible with
That's not true. In the future, puppet can obsolete puppet3 -- for example,
in EPEL 7.
Yes, it can, but I doubt it
# F18 Beta Blocker Review meeting #5
# Date: 2012-10-24
# Time: 16:00 UTC [1] (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net
Keeping with what we've done for the last couple of weeks, we're
planning to stop around the 3 hour mark if we're not done by then and
resume on 2012-10-2
On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 06:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 21:42 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
if ALL pear packages would be in the repos this whould be
a diffeent story - but taht is unlikely because who
would maintain all this packages really?
It seems like somethin
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 14:46 +0200, Brendan Jones wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have a number of outstanding reviews that are available for swap.
> All
> are fairly trivial so shouldn't take too much time:
Hey Brendan,
>
> ams - ALSA Modular Synth - a port from the CCRMA repo
> https://bugzilla.redhat.
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 16:25 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:58:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 12:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >
> > > """
> > > Compat Package Conflicts
> > > It is acceptable to use Conflicts: in some cases involving c
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:58:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 12:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> > """
> > Compat Package Conflicts
> > It is acceptable to use Conflicts: in some cases involving compat packages.
> > These are the cases where it is not feasible to pa
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Michael Stahnke
> wrote:
>> Puppet in the Fedora/EPEL ecosystem is a bit wonky currently.
>>
>> I'd really like to fix it.
>>
>> Problems:
>> * Fedora 17 (and higher) ships with Ruby 1.9.x and Puppet 2
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 21:42 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> if ALL pear packages would be in the repos this whould be
> a diffeent story - but taht is unlikely because who
> would maintain all this packages really?
It seems like something that should be automatable, really. Don't we
already have th
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 12:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> """
> Compat Package Conflicts
> It is acceptable to use Conflicts: in some cases involving compat packages.
> These are the cases where it is not feasible to patch applications to look
> in alternate locations for the -compat files, so t
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 19:39 +0100, Alain Williams wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when maintaining/configuring my systems I occasionally make changes that I
> think
> would be generally useful. What is the easiest way of bringing an idea to the
> attention of a package maintainer if he likes the idea I wou
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Michael Stahnke wrote:
> Puppet in the Fedora/EPEL ecosystem is a bit wonky currently.
>
> I'd really like to fix it.
>
> Problems:
> * Fedora 17 (and higher) ships with Ruby 1.9.x and Puppet 2.7.x. 2.7.x is not
> 100% compatible with 1.9.3. The number of issues
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 15:47 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Once you introduce version into the name, you will never be able to get
> rid of it,
Of course you can. In fact we've done this more than once in Fedora.
There was a gtk+3 package parallel installable with with 'gtk+' (which
was a 2.x versi
Lo!
On 23.10.2012 17:23, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 10/22/2012 10:37 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/22/2012 10:43 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 10/22/2012 12:09 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
There is currently no way to "undefine" a macro at the rpm commandline,
rpmbuild --define " %{nil}" ?
Hu
> From: Greg Swift
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> Date: 10/23/2012 15:51
> Subject: Re: Fixing Puppet in Fedora/EPEL
> Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:30:49AM -0700, Mi
On 10/23/2012 08:40 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
For years... pear have its metadata database stored in /usr/share/pear
This will move soon to /var/lib/pear (to be FHS compliant).
(feature approved/merged by upstream)
With this last change, we'll have "only" libraries in /usr/share/pear
(which is par
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:57:37 +0200
Simone Caronni wrote:
> On 23 October 2012 15:25, Eric "Sparks" Christensen
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Simone Caronni
> > wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> yesterday I had some "invalid channel policy" errors when trying to
> >> build packages wi
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:30:49AM -0700, Michael Stahnke wrote:
>> I am still not in favor of a puppet3 package. This is largely due to
>> overall compatibility. Puppet is a distributed system. Having the
>> package be called puppet in so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869158
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
Package perl-Encode-JP-Mobile-0.30-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869160
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
Package perl-PAR-1.007-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update
Am 23.10.2012 19:03, schrieb Matthias Runge:
> On 10/23/2012 06:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 23.10.2012 17:57, schrieb Remi Collet:
>>> Le 23/10/2012 17:45, Reindl Harald a écrit :
>>>
because i never found all used packages as RPM
>>>
>>> And ?
>>> What are you waiting for?
>>
>>
> "LZ" == Lukas Zapletal writes:
LZ> Hello, I have noticed that latest "tig" update in Fedora 17 changed
LZ> it's behavior.
tig has not ever been updated in F17; it still has the same 0.18-2
release that was there when F17 was spun.
- J<
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:44:11PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:52:47PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > Parallel installable guile interpreters:
> > http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-1.8/filelist
> > http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-2.0/filelist
>
>
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:49:01 -0600
"Nathanael D. Noblet" wrote:
> You should be able to email packagename-ow...@fedoraproject.org and
> it will get to whoever owns the package. One caveat is make sure its
> the *package name* as the src.rpm would be named, not the
> sub-packages it may produce.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> We can make the new package available, and do something to publicize that
> there is going to be a change. When 2.6.x is no longer maintained for
> security updates, the new package gets the old name and obsoletes the
> temporary name.
The
On 10/23/2012 12:39 PM, Alain Williams wrote:
Hi,
when maintaining/configuring my systems I occasionally make changes that I think
would be generally useful. What is the easiest way of bringing an idea to the
attention of a package maintainer if he likes the idea I would then collect
up & p
Hi,
There's also the alias -ow...@fedoraproject.org but i agree
that opening a ticket would be more appropriate.
best regards,
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:30:49AM -0700, Michael Stahnke wrote:
> I am still not in favor of a puppet3 package. This is largely due to
> overall compatibility. Puppet is a distributed system. Having the
> package be called puppet in some repositories and puppet3 in others
> (along with bin files
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Alain Williams wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when maintaining/configuring my systems I occasionally make changes that I
> think
> would be generally useful. What is the easiest way of bringing an idea to the
> attention of a package maintainer if he likes the idea I would
Hi,
when maintaining/configuring my systems I occasionally make changes that I think
would be generally useful. What is the easiest way of bringing an idea to the
attention of a package maintainer if he likes the idea I would then collect
up & push what I have done, etc.
I have looked at the
I am still not in favor of a puppet3 package. This is largely due to
overall compatibility. Puppet is a distributed system. Having the
package be called puppet in some repositories and puppet3 in others
(along with bin files/utils) will only the make the overall
user-experience of Puppet worse IM
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 10/22/2012 09:39 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
> > sorry I mistakenly deleted the R discussion from my inbox. Here is what
>
> Based on your errors, I'm wondering if you're using the R packages in
> Fedora, or if you've built R from source. I
On 10/23/2012 06:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 23.10.2012 17:57, schrieb Remi Collet:
Le 23/10/2012 17:45, Reindl Harald a écrit :
because i never found all used packages as RPM
And ?
What are you waiting for?
what should i wait for?
"pear install whatever"
pear itself is a package-sys
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Dario Lesca wrote:
> On this Asus EeePC seashell series Notebook:
> http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_e9f34fbb-dd9d-4b7d-8c77-027292c81297
>
> After kernel update to 3.6.[12] (plus relative kmod-wl* module) the WiFi
> stop work
>
> I have found this article:
>
Am 23.10.2012 17:57, schrieb Remi Collet:
> Le 23/10/2012 17:45, Reindl Harald a écrit :
>
>> because i never found all used packages as RPM
>
> And ?
> What are you waiting for?
what should i wait for?
"pear install whatever"
pear itself is a package-system which should not be wrapped
in ano
Am 23.10.2012 17:38, schrieb Remi Collet:
>> in the real life mostly even as RPM packed pear packages are
>> updated with "pear upgrade" because the RPM's are way behind by
>> design
>
> I disagree.
>
> RPM maintainers keep a consistent PEAR stack and add more QA.
>
> Before running any "pear
Am 23.10.2012 16:40, schrieb Remi Collet:
> For years... pear have its metadata database stored in /usr/share/pear
>
> This will move soon to /var/lib/pear (to be FHS compliant).
> (feature approved/merged by upstream)
>
> With this last change, we'll have "only" libraries in /usr/share/pear
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 23/10/2012 17:45, Reindl Harald a écrit :
> because i never found all used packages as RPM
And ?
What are you waiting for ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 23/10/2012 16:44, Reindl Harald a écrit :
> does "pear update pear" this also know?
Currently we have latest pear 1.9.4 in fedora.
As this feature have been merged by upstream,
yes next version will be aware of this feature.
And pear, in fedora,
Here's what I get:
$ sudo yum install R-java
[sudo] password for :
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
adobe-linux-i386 | 951 B 00:00
google-chrome| 951 B 00:00
rpmfusion-free-updates
Please use the Fedora users list for user questions:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the network (P
On 10/22/2012 10:37 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/22/2012 10:43 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
>> On 10/22/2012 12:09 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
There is currently no way to "undefine" a macro at the rpm commandline,
>>>
>>> rpmbuild --define " %{nil}" ?
>>
>> Huh, I swear I knew that once. :)
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Yes, I understand that ... therefore you need two versions of puppet
> installed in parallel. There was proposal to prepare puppet3
> package, while I think that the correct way is to move puppet to
> version 3 and prepare new puppet2 o
On 10/22/2012 09:39 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
> sorry I mistakenly deleted the R discussion from my inbox. Here is what
Based on your errors, I'm wondering if you're using the R packages in
Fedora, or if you've built R from source. I did a fresh install of R:
(yum install R R-java), then ran inst
On 10/22/2012 07:52 PM, Michael Weiner wrote:
> Did you try re-installing rJava within R (i.e.
> install.packages("rJava")) ?? I wasnt aware these contrib packages
> were available through yum
rJava is included as a subpackage of R. (yum install R-java)
~tom
==
Fedora Project
--
devel mailing l
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 01:50:59AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 17.10.12 18:02, Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > I'd like to see the current binary format officially documented
> > upstream, and a promise not maintain backwards compatibility forever
> > (and some f
Il giorno mar, 23/10/2012 alle 11.41 +0200, Dario Lesca ha scritto:
> After kernel update to 3.6.[12]
Sorry, kernel is 3.6.x and not 2.6.x as erroneously reported in the
subject
--
Dario Lesca - sip:da...@solinos.it
(Inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 17 Gnome3)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedo
For years... pear have its metadata database stored in /usr/share/pear
This will move soon to /var/lib/pear (to be FHS compliant).
(feature approved/merged by upstream)
With this last change, we'll have "only" libraries in /usr/share/pear
(which is part of the default php include_path)
WARNING :
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
Fedora Infrastructure has begun using ansible for some system setup
and other orchestration/automation tasks.
Our (just beginning) public repos of it are here:
http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/
Just out of my curiosity, i
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 23.10.2012 15:37, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
>
>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:22:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
But that doesn't help people running puppet 2.6 _now_, and just
introduces
complication into the packaging.
>>
On 23 October 2012 15:25, Eric "Sparks" Christensen
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Simone Caronni wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> yesterday I had some "invalid channel policy" errors when trying to
>> build packages with koji. Tasks were never ending with the "building"
>> status on.
>> I cance
Dne 23.10.2012 15:37, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:22:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
But that doesn't help people running puppet 2.6 _now_, and just introduces
complication into the packaging.
Introducing new package is complication anyway, so what is the point?
See ear
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
>> meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
>> irc.freenode.net.
>>
>> Links to all tickets below can be found at:
>
- Original Message -
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
> Links to all tickets below can be found at:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
>
> = Followups =
>
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:52:47PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Parallel installable guile interpreters:
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-1.8/filelist
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/guile-2.0/filelist
So both new and old guile scripts need to be patched to call
the right binary
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 23.10.2012 15:10, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:57:13PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Lets have puppet-3.x and puppet2 for whoever wants to use old version.
But that doesn't help people running puppet 2.6 _now_, and just introduce
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:22:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >But that doesn't help people running puppet 2.6 _now_, and just introduces
> >complication into the packaging.
> Introducing new package is complication anyway, so what is the point?
See earlier comments. The point is that when the up
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> yesterday I had some "invalid channel policy" errors when trying to
> build packages with koji. Tasks were never ending with the "building"
> status on.
> I canceled the builds after few hours and today I tried again to build them
Dne 23.10.2012 15:10, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:57:13PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I vote for having puppet3 and not touching the default version. This
will be more challenging, but we all know a bit about puppet upgrades
and transitions - it can be big pain.
Lets have
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:57:13PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >I vote for having puppet3 and not touching the default version. This
> >will be more challenging, but we all know a bit about puppet upgrades
> >and transitions - it can be big pain.
> Lets have puppet-3.x and puppet2 for whoever wants
Hello, mate-screensaver maintainer:
leigh123linux wrote, at 10/23/2012 04:13 PM +9:00:
commit e8b3798a18387d3e05675f40c4ee5998e94d0dfd
Author: leigh123linux
Date: Tue Oct 23 08:13:31 2012 +0100
Initial import
.gitignore|1 +
mate-screensaver.spec | 131 +
Compose started at Tue Oct 23 09:15:30 UTC 2012
Compose finished at Tue Oct 23 12:07:10 UTC 2012
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Dne 23.10.2012 09:55, Lukas Zapletal napsal(a):
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 07:35:28PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
* Move EPEL 6, Fedora >= 17 to use Puppet 3.0.
Speaking for my previous job, it would really be unfortunate to have a
non-compatible update of puppet in EPEL. Unless accompanied by ve
On 10/23/2012 12:12 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> This is what I had originally in mind. After trying to realize this idea and
> consulting it with the maintainer (I'm a comaintainer of guile), it didn't
> seem
> right. The problem is that a lot of things have to be renamed, including some
> autotools
commit adc9f1d12e8f1a6ba1f8154f2b8e95b5524e8f1b
Author: Marcela Mašláňová
Date: Tue Oct 23 12:13:26 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Marcela Mašláňová
perl-Test-Memory-Cycle.spec | 14 +++---
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff
On 10/23/2012 11:55 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> I agree, updating 21 packages is a bit too much at this point in F18
> schedule.
>
> However, a way to make this work for F18 would be creating a parallel
> installable guile20 package. So instead of what you are planning now:
>
> guile-2.0.x
> compat
On 10/23/2012 11:42 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> On 10/23/2012 11:15 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> On 10/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I've created a review request for compat-guile1.8:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868263
>>>
>>> Once the compat package lan
commit aa5091e31dcb2f09ed0f9894d6aeae31af8c1200
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Tue Oct 23 11:35:44 2012 +0200
2.0008 bump
This update fixes XML::LibXML builds with libxml2 in non-standard
locations.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-XML-LibXML.spec |5 -
sources
On this Asus EeePC seashell series Notebook:
http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_e9f34fbb-dd9d-4b7d-8c77-027292c81297
After kernel update to 3.6.[12] (plus relative kmod-wl* module) the WiFi
stop work
I have found this article:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1176829
then I have in
On 10/23/2012 11:15 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 10/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I've created a review request for compat-guile1.8:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868263
>>
>> Once the compat package lands in rawhide, I will leave some time for the
>> tra
Hello,
yesterday I had some "invalid channel policy" errors when trying to
build packages with koji. Tasks were never ending with the "building"
status on.
I canceled the builds after few hours and today I tried again to build them.
The jobs always fail because I have errors like the following (3
On 10/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've created a review request for compat-guile1.8:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868263
>
> Once the compat package lands in rawhide, I will leave some time for the
> transition (I may work on the required patches if time
Hello,
I have noticed that latest "tig" update in Fedora 17 changed it's
behavior. Default key binding is different, "j" and "k" keys now
automatically change from change-list to change-content, therefore I
need to hit the "tab" key. Annoying, I want the "mutt-like" behavior
back :-)
Anyone notic
I've written a bash script to turn a directory, directory tree, or
list of files into an XML file suitable for use with the "Desktop
Background" gallery construct in GNOME.
I could not find one @GNOME.org or freedesktop.org, so I wrote one for
myself based on the "Cosmos" gallery definition an
> I'm sure that 2.6 won't last for the life of EL5, let alone EL6. At
> the same time, I didn't push to get 2.7 in EPEL because it isn't a
> completely compatible update. And 3.0 was coming so I figured we
> could wait to see what things looked like when it did. The
> alternative would have been
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 07:35:28PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > * Move EPEL 6, Fedora >= 17 to use Puppet 3.0.
> Speaking for my previous job, it would really be unfortunate to have a
> non-compatible update of puppet in EPEL. Unless accompanied by very loud
> trumpets and fireworks beforehand,
> Fedora Infrastructure has begun using ansible for some system setup
> and other orchestration/automation tasks.
>
> Our (just beginning) public repos of it are here:
>
> http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/
>
Just out of my curiosity, is Fedora Infra going to replace Puppe
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 06:51:26PM +0200, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
> The ultimate software center is a web application, like Google playstore.
+1
Why to waste time creating a desktop app when this could be in the cloud
already. Plus this could be turned into a "desktop web app" easily,
brow
80 matches
Mail list logo
