2012/10/11 Adam Williamson wrote:
> A proposal to change the filesystem that was synchronized with and
> planned to continue to be identical to (or at least fully compatible
> with) how it's done in Android and Solaris, with the participation of
> Google and Oracle, would be a more interesting pro
2012/10/10 David Howells wrote:
> The contents of /dev vary depending on what hardware the computer has
> available - which may change in real time - so it cannot be shared, so
> why move it?
Ah, no, /dev was moved not because of sharing. It's just original UsrMove
among other benefits has the li
On Qua, 2012-10-10 at 13:11 +0300, Serge wrote:
> Turning /lib into /usr/lib was also incompatible with every other
> Linux
> distro, nevertheless it's already done.
Don't see why ?
ll /
lib -> usr/lib
lib64 -> usr/lib64
sbin -> usr/sbin
bin -> usr/bin
What is the difference of /lib and /usr/li
David Howells wrote:
> Actually, the UsrMove has mucked up at least one way of doing things: we
> have/had RHEL customer(s) who kept /usr on AFS and were able to boot just
> using the stuff in /bin and /sbin. This is no longer a viable option with
> Fedora, and presumably RHEL-7.
Actually, system
Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Seth Vidal said:
>> Not every decision a distribution makes is a good one, lets not get
>> caught up believing that we cannot make mistakes.
>>
>> UsrMove was a mistake. End of discussion. Let's go back.
>
> I agree. The additional churn would be another
Hello,
These packages have become semi important to us as well so I'd be
willing and interested in being a co-maintainer.
On 10/11/2012 10:56 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:46:35PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Steve Salevan wrote:
Hey guys, I'd
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:46:35PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Steve Salevan wrote:
>
> >Hey guys, I'd like to put my name in to take over ownership of the orphaned
> >Func and Certmaster packages as per the orphaned package takeover procedure.
> > I am the new proje
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Steve Salevan wrote:
Hey guys, I'd like to put my name in to take over ownership of the orphaned
Func and Certmaster packages as per the orphaned package takeover procedure. I
am the new project maintainer for these
projects, and I'd like to add a few tuneups here and
Hey guys,
I'd like to put my name in to take over ownership of the orphaned Func and
Certmaster packages as per the orphaned package takeover procedure. I am
the new project maintainer for these projects, and I'd like to add a few
tuneups here and there that we've found useful out here at Tumblr.
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 20:01:32 -0600 (MDT)
build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> Broken upgrade path report for tags jive-4-0-dev -> jive-4-0-el6-dev:
> ---
> Broken paths by builder:
> ---
> This report generated by Fedora Release Engineering, using
> http://git.fedora
On 10/9/12 12:34 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 10/9/12 9:18 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
From the list of packages this minimal set still installs, that I'd
really like to see gone:
chkconfig
gamin
info
systemd-sysv
chkconfig seems like it could have the 'alternatives' bit split off.
I've not i
Compose started at Thu Oct 11 09:15:30 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[almanah]
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit)
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.16()(64bit)
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 08:16:49AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > Honestly, we should be building glib2 with --disable-fam, since glib
> > will prefer the inotify notification module anyway (it has prio 20 and
> > fam prio 10).
>
> It looks[1] like Matthias was wa
13 matches
Mail list logo
