On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:23:48AM -0400, Zdenek Pavlas wrote:
> On Wed Sep 26 08:02:05, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> > yes, and that is why statistics of mirrors are meaningsless
> > because of this fact my idea to give us a config-option
> > "dear yum, if the selected mirror provides lower than
> >
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2012-10-08
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again tomorrow. An important day again, as we should
check freeze-ability for F18 B
Hi there,
one more question: How can one install something that is neither an
'environment' nor a minimal install install? Say I want openbox as
window manager, how would I do that?
openbox is in the group 'window-managers', but that group is not shown
in anaconda. I guess we need to creae a grou
In order to reduce the size of the F18 Xfce spin, I wanted to edit comps
- but decided to not do so until I fully understand what is going on. I
seem to have missed a lot since since last our discussion at Blacksburg,
so have a lot of questions.
Here we go:
1. How can a package maintainer def
* Nikos Roussos [07/10/2012 20:41] :
>
> I still haven't understand what it takes to get this started. Besides of
> course from having some people dedicating some time on that. Convincing
> infrastructure team is the first step? Does this need to get through FESCO
> first?
You'll probably want to
Am 07.10.2012 19:55, schrieb drago01:
> Maybe maybe not. The point is that a fancy software shop would result
> into this "old mother" type of user consider to use fedora.
> A user ultimately don't care about packages but about applications.
> Other distritors are moving in this direction while we
drago01 wrote:
>A user ultimately don't care about packages but about applications.
>Other distritors are moving in this direction while we fall behind.
>We should lead here like we do in other areas.
+1
I still haven't understand what it takes to get this started. Besides of course
from havin
dwalsh writes:
> [only the $subject]
# stap -e 'probe syscall.open {
if(substr(filename,0,5) == "/proc") {
println(pid(), " ", execname(), " ", filename)
print_ubacktrace()
} }' -d /usr/lib*/libc-*.so
(Repeat with more -d /usr/bin/foo as stap advises.)
- FChE
--
devel mailing
>
> The ultimate software center is a web application, like Google playstore.
>
> All the rating and commenting and other info, need to be centrally
> maintained and it is not a good idea to try to distribute this kind of
> metadata.
> There shall just be a local installer to install the packages t
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:51 PM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> the possibility of Software Center in Fedora has already been discussed
>> several times, last time a few month ago.
>> I read an article about a successful Goog
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> Hi,
> the possibility of Software Center in Fedora has already been discussed
> several times, last time a few month ago.
> I read an article about a successful Google Summer of Code project [1]
> whose goal was to make Software Center a dis
Compose started at Sun Oct 7 08:15:09 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-10.fc18.x86_64 requires sip-api(8) >= 0:8.1
[PyQt]
PyQt-3.18.1-12.fc18.x86_64 requires sip-api(8) >= 0:8.1
[PyX]
PyX-0.11.1
Hello,
according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Deprecated_Package
I want to get ownership of kadu package (I think the kadu should be in
fedora because of gadu-gadu popularity in Poland). ReReview Request is:
#863795
Regards,
Kar
Compose started at Sun Oct 7 09:15:38 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[almanah]
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit)
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.16()(64bit)
On 10/07/2012 02:36 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> I'm sure that this information is somewhere on the Fedora Wiki, but my
> search-fu apparently isn't up to the task of finding it.
>
> What are the plans for LVM and/or software RAID support?
>
> Currently (F18 Beta TC2), it seems to be impossible for t
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 07:57:24AM +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> The only workaround nowaday is to install Fedora without
> installing the bottloader. After the installation you have
> to boot from a rescue media and install the bootmanager
> after chroot to the root partitition in the LVM.
You'
16 matches
Mail list logo
