gradle 1.0

2012-09-22 Thread gil
hi, gradle alredy exist in fedora (provides only open-api module) but now is required to build Hibernate 4 (and some other projects groovy, springframework,...) which is a direct requirement to add support for JPA2 in jboss-as. gradle 1.0 is available here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.

Re: Firefox / Thunderbird 17 ESR for Fedora 16/17

2012-09-22 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 07:37:13PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > > Does it mean Fedora will stop shipping the latest FF/TB and stick to ESR > > instead? Or is it for parallel-installation purposes? > Assuming RHEL will have ESR (which is reasonable), either Fedora also stays > with ESR (which is a

Re: Firefox / Thunderbird 17 ESR for Fedora 16/17

2012-09-22 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 09/22/2012 01:02 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: > Does it mean Fedora will stop shipping the latest FF/TB and stick to ESR > instead? Or is it for parallel-installation purposes? Assuming RHEL will have ESR (which is reasonable), either Fedora also stays with ESR (which is against the "first" F) o

Re: Determining package set for build

2012-09-22 Thread Dennis Gilmore
You are not guaranteed that the rpm making the chroot uses a compatible db4 with what's inside the chroot. so you can not run rpm in the chroot. It may or may not work and is not supported. "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: >On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 08:21:29PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> I'm tr

Re: Determining package set for build

2012-09-22 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 09/22/2012 02:31 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: And yet, this information is already available. This is the latest failed build of scipy in F18: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4509076 In this page, there is a link to the buildroot used to attempt building the package:

rawhide report: 20120922 changes

2012-09-22 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat Sep 22 08:15:09 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [Io-language] Io-language-20110912-5.fc19.i686 requires libmemcached.so.10 Io-language-20110912-5.fc19.x86_64 requires libmemcached.so.10()(64bit) [alma

Re: Firefox / Thunderbird 17 ESR for Fedora 16/17

2012-09-22 Thread Ralf Ertzinger
Hi. On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:06:21 +0200, Heiko Adams wrote > I guess that only the current fedora release will get the latest FF/TB > versions while the previous version will stick on the latest ESR. How is that going to work? The current release will become the previous version at some time, and

Re: Firefox / Thunderbird 17 ESR for Fedora 16/17

2012-09-22 Thread Heiko Adams
Am 22.09.2012 13:02, schrieb Julian Sikorski: > Does it mean Fedora will stop shipping the latest FF/TB and stick to ESR > instead? Or is it for parallel-installation purposes? > I guess that only the current fedora release will get the latest FF/TB versions while the previous version will stick o

Re: Firefox / Thunderbird 17 ESR for Fedora 16/17

2012-09-22 Thread Julian Sikorski
W dniu 21.09.2012 15:33, Martin Stransky pisze: > Hi guys, > > as the subject says there are test packages available for your beloved > Fedora's. Especially Thunderbird 17 (Earlybird now) needs some love from > you (the 17ESR line is going to be a background for the future ones) so > it would be g

Re: Determining package set for build

2012-09-22 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Saturday, September 22, 2012 03:45 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 08:21:29PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: I'm trying to track down a problem with scipy not building on F18 due to a test crashing. However it builds fine in rawhide, and on F18 using my local mock builde

Re: Determining package set for build

2012-09-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 08:21:29PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > I'm trying to track down a problem with scipy not building on F18 > due to a test crashing. However it builds fine in rawhide, and on > F18 using my local mock builder (which runs F17). I'd like to > compare the package list for t

Re: Segfault in latest glibc 2.16.90-13.fc19 (Rawhide)

2012-09-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 03:00:59PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/21/2012 03:00 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:06:00PM +0200, drago01 wrote: > >>On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Richard W.M. Jones > >>wrote: > >>> > >>>I wonder if anyone has noticed any odd segfaults

HEADUP changes for libmemcached in rawhide (soname bump, SASL, bison)

2012-09-22 Thread Remi Collet
Hi, I just build libmemcached 1.0.11 in rawhide. Soname is now libmemcached.so.11 As SASL support is broken for some versions (not detected in configure, build fails, test fails, no upstream answer, ...) I choose to drop SASL support from libmemcached. But, as our memcached server have not sasl