I'm trying to track down a problem with scipy not building on F18 due to
a test crashing. However it builds fine in rawhide, and on F18 using my
local mock builder (which runs F17). I'd like to compare the package
list for the buildroots for each build to look for differences. I can
get this
On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 17:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
> suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20120917
That should of course be
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/201209
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2012-09-24
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again! We have follow-up on last week and the TC/RC
naming topic we didn't get to l
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:06:00PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > I wonder if anyone has noticed any odd segfaults when doing Rawhide
> > builds today? We see a pretty odd one during the libvirt build:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I wonder if anyone has noticed any odd segfaults when doing Rawhide
> builds today? We see a pretty odd one during the libvirt build:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859528#c3
>
> The segfault goes away if I downgrade
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/474
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/474/0001-Ticket-747-Root-DN-Access-Control-days-allowed-not-w.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
I wonder if anyone has noticed any odd segfaults when doing Rawhide
builds today? We see a pretty odd one during the libvirt build:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859528#c3
The segfault goes away if I downgrade glibc to the -11 version.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Gro
On 09/20/2012 01:47 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
>
> Seconding what Lennart said, I hope to be able with this to improve
> Fedora's container experience, which I also
> view as crucial for a deep cloud strategy. I hope this is good news
> for at least a part of you guys!
I used to be sys admin work
Hello,
My name is Ernie Allen. I am a developer in the Red Hat ENG JBoss Development
group working on the Red Hat Enterprise MRG product team.
I am currently working on an SNMP agent for the qpid broker[1]. I generally
work on front-end UI and web related utilities like Cumin and QT graphical
Hi guys,
as the subject says there are test packages available for your beloved
Fedora's. Especially Thunderbird 17 (Earlybird now) needs some love from
you (the 17ESR line is going to be a background for the future ones) so
it would be great if you can install it, run it and report any issues
Compose started at Fri Sep 21 08:15:09 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[almanah]
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit)
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.16()(64bit)
Le Ven 21 septembre 2012 13:36, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
>
> Le Jeu 20 septembre 2012 23:38, Ben Rosser a écrit :
>> Here's a preliminary cmap rpm review request:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859246
>>
>> So far, the only package I've worked on making this compatible with is
>>
Le Jeu 20 septembre 2012 23:38, Ben Rosser a écrit :
> Here's a preliminary cmap rpm review request:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859246
>
> So far, the only package I've worked on making this compatible with is my
> own, pdfminer: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=82367
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:27 AM, les wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 15:26 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:04:52PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> > In summary: I believe that containers are a big part of being awesome in
>> > the cloud. And right now running Fedora i
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 21.09.2012 10:34, Stanislav Ochotnicky pisze:
>> Quoting Julian Sikorski (2012-09-21 08:53:26)
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> one of the updates I am preparing is supposed to replace some of the
>>> folders with symlinks. Unfortunately, this l
W dniu 21.09.2012 10:34, Stanislav Ochotnicky pisze:
> Quoting Julian Sikorski (2012-09-21 08:53:26)
>> Hi list,
>>
>> one of the updates I am preparing is supposed to replace some of the
>> folders with symlinks. Unfortunately, this leads to rpm cpio: rename
>> errors upon an update attempt. Is th
Quoting Julian Sikorski (2012-09-21 08:53:26)
> Hi list,
>
> one of the updates I am preparing is supposed to replace some of the
> folders with symlinks. Unfortunately, this leads to rpm cpio: rename
> errors upon an update attempt. Is there a standard way of dealing with this?
http://bugzilla.r
On 09/21/2012 10:27 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/21/2012 09:22 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 21.09.2012 08:53, Julian Sikorski pisze:
Hi list,
one of the updates I am preparing is supposed to replace some of the
folders with symlinks. Unfortunately, this leads to rpm cpio: rename
errors
On 09/21/2012 09:22 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 21.09.2012 08:53, Julian Sikorski pisze:
Hi list,
one of the updates I am preparing is supposed to replace some of the
folders with symlinks. Unfortunately, this leads to rpm cpio: rename
errors upon an update attempt. Is there a standard wa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859328
Bug ID: 859328
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
URL: https://rt.perl.org/rt3//Public/Bug/Display.html?id=10
5924
Version: 16
Priorit
W dniu 21.09.2012 08:53, Julian Sikorski pisze:
> Hi list,
>
> one of the updates I am preparing is supposed to replace some of the
> folders with symlinks. Unfortunately, this leads to rpm cpio: rename
> errors upon an update attempt. Is there a standard way of dealing with this?
>
> Regards,
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
