Re: Fedora multi-arch

2012-09-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On 2012-09-14 7:20, Jiri Eischmann wrote: We discussed it in FAmSCo and I also spoke with Fedora QA guys. They're willing to do the testing. It's not particularly difficult. What they would appreciate is building those ISOs for RC so that they can test it before the final release. So far, the

Re: Bundled/embedded data in a package

2012-09-14 Thread Ben Rosser
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Nicolas Mailhot < nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> wrote: > > Adobe CMAP is used by lots of font, ps and pdf related apps and IIRC > packaging it is currently on the wishlist. > > You should unbundle it and create a separate package. > > I don't think CMAP has security

Re: Non-responsive Maintainer for pdns

2012-09-14 Thread Paul Wouters
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Morten Stevens wrote: Currently there are no working pdns (PowerDNS) builds for Fedora 18, because the maintainer is unavailable. 3 weeks ago I sent an email to the maintainer (Ruben), but so far no response. Yesterday, I sent him an email if he accepted me as co-maintaine

Re: [HEADS-UP] retire lslk(8)

2012-09-14 Thread Adam Jackson
On 9/14/12 3:56 AM, Karel Zak wrote: I'd like to retire package lslk (command lslk(8) -- list local locks) in Fedora >= 18. The package upstream is officially inactive since July 2001. The latest util-linux release provides a new reimplementation lslocks(8), this new command is alread

Re: [HEADS-UP] retire lslk(8)

2012-09-14 Thread Bill Nottingham
Karel Zak (k...@redhat.com) said: > > I'd like to retire package lslk (command lslk(8) -- list local locks) > in Fedora >= 18. > > The package upstream is officially inactive since July 2001. The > latest util-linux release provides a new reimplementation lslocks(8), > this new command is a

[Bug 857478] New: Missing dependencies

2012-09-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857478 Bug ID: 857478 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org, st...@silug.org Assignee

Re: Fedora multi-arch

2012-09-14 Thread Jiri Eischmann
We discussed it in FAmSCo and I also spoke with Fedora QA guys. They're willing to do the testing. It's not particularly difficult. What they would appreciate is building those ISOs for RC so that they can test it before the final release. So far, the multi-arch ISOs have been built only for the fi

Re: Bundled/embedded data in a package

2012-09-14 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Jeu 13 septembre 2012 05:02, Ben Rosser a écrit : > So I've had a review ticket open on bugzilla for a while now for this > package: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823679 > > The software, pdfminer, bundles Adobe cmap data to process Chinese, > Japanese, and Korean languages in a

Re: Bundled/embedded data in a package

2012-09-14 Thread Tomas Radej
=== DISCLAIMER === I am simply a licensing enthusiast and no expert on law or Packaging Guidelines, please understand this message solely as my personal opinion. == Hi, On 09/13/2012 05:02 AM, Ben Rosser wrote: The software, pdfminer, bundles Adobe cmap data to process Chinese

rawhide report: 20120914 changes

2012-09-14 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Sep 14 08:15:10 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [almanah] almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit) almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.16()(64bit)

Re: Building packages for EPEL6 when Fedora moved to systemd

2012-09-14 Thread Simone Caronni
On 14 September 2012 13:40, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: > The fedora build setup has git branches for each release EL-5, EL-6, F17, > F19, Master, so there is no problem to have different .SPEC files for each > branch And is perfectly fine to have conditionals as well: http://fedoraproject.or

Re: Building packages for EPEL6 when Fedora moved to systemd

2012-09-14 Thread tim.laurid...@gmail.com
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Henrique Junior wrote: > Currently several packages in epel6 are facing the problem that Fedora is > now systemd based and therefore many RPMs can not be created for EL6 and > EL5. > Can a maintainer use, lets say, two spec files (one for Fedora and another > for E

Building packages for EPEL6 when Fedora moved to systemd

2012-09-14 Thread Henrique Junior
Currently several packages in epel6 are facing the problem that Fedora is now systemd based and therefore many RPMs can not be created for EL6 and EL5. Can a maintainer use, lets say, two spec files (one for Fedora and another for EL) or the correct approach in this case is the use of IFs during

Non-responsive Maintainer for pdns

2012-09-14 Thread Morten Stevens
Hello, Currently there are no working pdns (PowerDNS) builds for Fedora 18, because the maintainer is unavailable. 3 weeks ago I sent an email to the maintainer (Ruben), but so far no response. Yesterday, I sent him an email if he accepted me as co-maintainer for pdns, but again, no response.

[HEADS-UP] retire lslk(8)

2012-09-14 Thread Karel Zak
I'd like to retire package lslk (command lslk(8) -- list local locks) in Fedora >= 18. The package upstream is officially inactive since July 2001. The latest util-linux release provides a new reimplementation lslocks(8), this new command is already available in Fedora 18. Objections?