Hello,
On 13 September 2012 08:06, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Since F16/F17 do not have presets we cannot just port those macros
> there. What is one macro in F18 would map to two macros in F16/F17.
Can you please point me to the two macros? I only see a small difference.
I applied the macros
On Fri, 31.08.12 09:21, Simone Caronni (negativ...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 2- What's the status of the back-port of those macros to F16/F17 (with a
> different expansion of course)? Is it under evaluation? Should I wait for
> the resolution of this before starting to add the macros?
Since F16/F17 do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
Henrique Junior wrote:
> Fedora multi-arch [1] is a
> good idea that is not receiving the emphasis it should. In fact, most
> people do not even know it exists and I wonder why not give a little
> more emphasi
As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5284#comment:22 . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and t
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
> Henrique Junior wrote:
>
>> Fedora multi-arch [1] is a
>> good idea that is not receiving the emphasis it should. In fact, most
>> people do not even know it exists and I wonder why not give a little
So I've had a review ticket open on bugzilla for a while now for this
package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823679
The software, pdfminer, bundles Adobe cmap data to process Chinese,
Japanese, and Korean languages in a pdf file. However, the question is:
does this violate the genera
I know that the guys in QA have a lot of work to do already, but is there
any chance of multi-arch to receive more attention in the near future?
2012/9/12 Álvaro Castillo
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> These were originally for ambassadors only to use at events.
On 05/31/2012 11:45 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 05/31/2012 08:14 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 05/31/2012 02:40 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya!
Please be aware that since the most recent systemd uploads /tmp is now
in tmpfs by default in Rawhide/F18.
[...]
This will most likely lead to a
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> These were originally for ambassadors only to use at events.
>
> I have no objection to making them more known, however, I think they
> should be tested and produced in the same way other Fedora images are.
>
> In the f17 cycle they were not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Good day all,
Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting
today. For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-09-12/fedora-arm.2012-09-12-20.05.h
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
Henrique Junior wrote:
> Fedora multi-arch [1] is a
> good idea that is not receiving the emphasis it should. In fact, most
> people do not even know it exists and I wonder why not give a little
> more emphasis on this download option. maybe adding one mor
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:35:08 +0100
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qua, 2012-09-12 at 16:38 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > would it be possible to get /bin rid of EVERY
> > hardcoded path in the distribution?
> >
> > i have no single idea from where rpmbuild takes
> > "Requires: /bin/perl" nor why "s
Fedora multi-arch [1] is a
good idea that is not receiving the emphasis it should. In fact, most
people do not even know it exists and I wonder why not give a little
more emphasis on this download option. maybe adding one more entry in "Formats"
when downloading[2] .
What do you think?
[1] - h
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:25:58 + (UTC)
Michal Sekletar wrote:
> commit 656ccb33e9d99acd2ba0ef19e5c33dab97338af1
> Author: Michal Sekletar
> Date: Tue Sep 11 17:25:05 2012 +0200
>
> Removed unnecessary dependency on systemd-units
That dependency was there for ownership of the /etc/
The mpir package has changed from LGPLv2+ to LGPLv3+ in a new version
(2.5.1) being built for F18 and Rawhide. The only current consumer of
MPIR is Macaulay2, and it is dropping use of MPIR in F18+, so this
change should have no consequences.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mail
When building either host or guest additions for VirtualBox with dkms installed
and a >= 3.5 kernel, the corresponding System.map file in /usr/src/kernels/* is
deleted. I filed https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/10847 but it was closed in
the belief that this is not a VirtualBox bug. The reason I no
On Qua, 2012-09-12 at 16:38 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> would it be possible to get /bin rid of EVERY
> hardcoded path in the distribution?
>
> i have no single idea from where rpmbuild takes "Requires: /bin/perl"
> nor why "ssh user@host /script.sh" has still /bin/ before /usr/bin
> while ther
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-09-12)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 17:00:00 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-09-12/fesco.2012-09-12-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III writes:
>>Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>>> Is there any chance that 9.2 will be available for F18?
>
>> I think for 9.1 Tom pushed it just before beta when a few of us promised
>> to do some testing pronmptly.
>
>> So if 9.2 gets
Am 12.09.2012 13:25, schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 23:50:15 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't it already help if the build system would just refuse to
>> build newer versions in branches than which are in rawhide at that
>> moment?
>
> That would be dangerous with regard t
would it be possible to get /bin rid of EVERY
hardcoded path in the distribution?
i have no single idea from where rpmbuild takes "Requires: /bin/perl"
nor why "ssh user@host /script.sh" has still /bin/ before /usr/bin
while there is no single config-file containing a PATH-change which
would refle
Am 29.08.2012 00:43, schrieb Jerry James:
> First, systemd complained about being unable to find
> systemd-journal-flush.service. Sure enough, it wasn't in the
> initramfs. So I added
> "$systemdsystemunitdir/systemd-journal-flush.service" to
> /usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/98systemd/module-setup.sh,
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 18 Alpha.
Thursday, September 13, 2012 @19:00 UTC (15:00 EDT/21:00 CEST)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine if the
Compose started at Wed Sep 12 08:15:12 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[almanah]
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit)
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.16()(64bit)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 re
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://ww
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 23:50:15 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Wouldn't it already help if the build system would just refuse to
> build newer versions in branches than which are in rawhide at that
> moment?
That would be dangerous with regard to security fixes, for example.
Rawhide buildroot contents
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:31:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III writes:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:24:40 -0400,
> >Tom Lane wrote:
> >> PG 9.2 is now released, and F18 isn't beta yet. So I'd like to push it
> >> into F18 --- will anyone help test?
>
> > Yeah!
>
> > I'll def
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:56 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I haven't seen linux system killed so effectively for a lng time,
>> everytime I try to use bluetooth dongle my system just crashes.
>> Has this been reported? I searched this list and bugzilla but didn't
>> finy an
29 matches
Mail list logo
