On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 23:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> So instead of /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/50-synaptics.conf you should
>> create /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/50-synaptics.conf . Other than that, I
>> think
>> the advice is good.
>
> Hi,
>
>
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 23:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So instead of /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/50-synaptics.conf you should
> create /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/50-synaptics.conf . Other than that, I
> think
> the advice is good.
Hi,
Thanks Adam, Onuralp, Alvaro.
I've created a page here[1]. P
On 2012-09-11 23:06, Álvaro Castillo wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Álvaro Castillo
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Ankur Sinha
wrote:
I thought so too. I was wondering what the DE agnostic way of
enabling
tapping would be though. I use gnome, and the "mouse" utility does
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Álvaro Castillo
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
>> I thought so too. I was wondering what the DE agnostic way of enabling
>> tapping would be though. I use gnome, and the "mouse" utility does this
>> for me. However, when folks on
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> I thought so too. I was wondering what the DE agnostic way of enabling
> tapping would be though. I use gnome, and the "mouse" utility does this
> for me. However, when folks on other DEs, such as XFCE ask me how to do
> it, I don't quite have
Gnome and KDE has default utility for mouse and touchpad configuration.
XFCE on Fedora 17 that's mean XFCE 4.8 no utility but we gonna see mouse
and touchpad utility on next version ( XFCE 4.10 on Fedora 18 )
Tour link for XFCE ; http://www.xfce.org/about/tour
XFCE 4.8 touchpad =
http://thangng
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 20:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It's a function of the desktop, and we go with the upstream desktop
> defaults, AFAIK.
I thought so too. I was wondering what the DE agnostic way of enabling
tapping would be though. I use gnome, and the "mouse" utility does this
for me
On 12/09/12 05:33, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Meaning Desktop Environments, like GNOME, KDE, XFCE, etc. We use
their default settings.
Which with regards to your current problem means ... if you want to have
it changed, go upstream and ask it to be changed there.
Matěj
--
devel mailing list
devel@
Le mercredi 12 septembre 2012 à 04:39 +0100, Álvaro Castillo a écrit :
> Ok, but I do not understand why a simple thing is not set by default?
> bit empathic? a lot users want is enabled by default, others doesn't
> like it, ok, but a who doesn't like it, not affect on your navigation,
> can ignor
> Ok, but I do not understand why a simple thing is not set by default?
> bit empathic? a lot users want is enabled by default, others doesn't
> like it, ok, but a who doesn't like it, not affect on your
> navigation, can ignore this.
There is no good default, you set it one way, you get a crapto
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Álvaro Castillo
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> It's a function of the desktop, and we go with the upstream desktop
> >> defaults, AFAIK.
> >
> >
> >
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Álvaro Castillo
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>>
>> It's a function of the desktop, and we go with the upstream desktop
>> defaults, AFAIK.
>
>
> Mmm, sorry, I cannot understand very well. Im spanish and my english is
> li
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It's a function of the desktop, and we go with the upstream desktop
> defaults, AFAIK.
Mmm, sorry, I cannot understand very well. Im spanish and my english is
limited, I can not take things for granted.
Desktop, you mean, desktops PCs, r
On 2012-09-11 19:33, Álvaro Castillo wrote:
Hello devel list,
I want know... Why Fedora doesn't included TapButton support of
touchpad by default?
I saw AskFedora and FedoraForum.org, and it happened to me too after
install or show live CD to people, a lot users request, or asking
about How to
Hello devel list,
I want know... Why Fedora doesn't included TapButton support of touchpad by
default?
I saw AskFedora and FedoraForum.org, and it happened to me too after
install or show live CD to people, a lot users request, or asking about How
to setup TapButton.
It's ok, you can enable it f
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 11.09.12 09:52, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote:
>
>> > > This would give packagers much more flexibility about branching and
>> > > would also simplify our model as the master branch would just go
>> > > away... One branch l
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic 932 F18 Features - progress at Feature
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:12:13AM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> This package was being reviewed, but the review disappeared on me almost
> two months ago:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834070
I'm still looking for someone who would like to do a review swap with
me.
--
Darr
# F18 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #7
# Date: 2012-09-12
# Time: 16:00 UTC [1] (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
We'll be running through the alpha blockers and nice-to-haves. The
current list of blocker bugs is available at:
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/bl
commit a45358bf335c56f1a35b4cc9b9415633ed3e4bed
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Sep 11 16:50:42 2012 +0200
Free hash entries before values on delete
...-Free-hash-entries-before-values-on-delet.patch | 170
perl.spec |6 +
2
commit 387be98f482159444d615916d74d5447740ff608
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Sep 11 16:23:26 2012 +0200
Match starting byte in non-UTF-8 mode
...erl-101710-Regression-with-i-latin1-chars.patch | 83
perl.spec |6 ++
2 fil
commit b77e8b246019d2664672c50aa855fa04f28a6ca9
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Sep 11 10:51:23 2012 +0200
Do not truncate syscall() return value to 32 bits
...-pp_syscall-I32-retval-truncates-the-retu.patch | 32
perl.spec |
commit c1027e1fb47dfc453aecec8ddb3b8df25d425cba
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Sep 11 10:32:13 2012 +0200
Clear $@ before `do' I/O error
...T-113730-should-be-cleared-on-do-IO-error.patch | 52
perl.spec | 10 +++-
2 files ch
On Tue, 11.09.12 09:52, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote:
> > > This would give packagers much more flexibility about branching and
> > > would also simplify our model as the master branch would just go
> > > away... One branch less that can be confused is a win for
> > > everybody.
> >
> > I
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:29:36 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 2012-09-10 15:22, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 10.09.12 15:14, Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) wrote:
...snip...
> > What I am proposing is to get rid of the "master" branch, so that
> > people
> > can just branch off
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>
> I made some tests:
> - postgresql 9.1 installation
> - database import
> - check if it works
> - postgresql 9.2 update
> - database update
> - check if it works
>
> I did not notice any problems during testing.
I did a similar test and
Hi,
2012/9/10 Tom Lane :
> Bruno Wolff III writes:
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:24:40 -0400,
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>> PG 9.2 is now released, and F18 isn't beta yet. So I'd like to push it
>>> into F18 --- will anyone help test?
>
>> Yeah!
>
>> I'll definitely do some testing. My personal web
commit 994ce19d91709b18235d228b63b7a717228ee98b
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Sep 11 14:46:11 2012 +0200
Rebuild against pl-6.2.1
perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi.spec b/perl-Language-
Compose started at Tue Sep 11 08:15:10 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[almanah]
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit)
almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.16()(64bit)
On Monday 10 September 2012 15:14:26 Adam Williamson wrote:
> I don't think that's true, actually. There certainly are devs who take
> advantage of the model.
Exactly. Think glibc as another example. Back then when the glibc people did
their development work on Branched it was generally viewed as
- Original Message -
> From: "Danishka Navin"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 10:45:25 AM
> Subject: Netbeans IDE package for Fedora
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a specific reason that Netbeans IDE is not available in
> Fedora repository?
A really simp
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Danishka Navin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a specific reason that Netbeans IDE is not available in Fedora
> repository?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-January/161094.html
Cheers,
-Amit.
--
http://echorand.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists
Hi,
Is there a specific reason that Netbeans IDE is not available in Fedora
repository?
--
Danishka Navin
http://danishkanavin.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/danishkanavin
http://www.flickr.com/photos/danishkanavin/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
On 09/10/2012 04:55 PM, Jerry James wrote:
Evolution crashed on takeoff this morning. I tried to report the bug
with ABRT, and was surprised when it automatically contacted the
retrace server without asking me what to do first. I've already got
huge piles of debuginfo packages installed, so it
34 matches
Mail list logo
