As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 6 (TC6)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5284#comment:13
. Please see the following pages for download links (including delta
ISOs) and testin
On 09/05/2012 12:48 PM, Simone Caronni wrote:
> This means that even for the EPEL branch the first %if block is
> evaluated; so the fedpkg on my system (Fedora 17) sets %rhel to 6 but
> does not unset %fedora and they are both present.
Confirmed. fedpkg is inheriting the value of "%fedora" from th
Good day all,
Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today.
For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-09-05/fedora-meeting-1.2012-09-05-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedo
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 13:39 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> mercurial-2.3.1 will not build on f18 because of the python-docutils version.
>
> It does build on f17, and also on f19.
>
> f19 has
> python-docutils-0.10-0.6.20120824svn7502.fc19.src.rpm
f18 has this update:
https://admin.fedoraproject.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:39:35PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> mercurial-2.3.1 will not build on f18 because of the python-docutils version.
>
> It does build on f17, and also on f19.
>
> f19 has
> python-docutils-0.10-0.6.20120824svn7502.fc19.src.rpm
>
> 1. Can we update f18 to this version?
On 05/09/12 19:47, Dave Jones wrote:
followed by 3-4 pages of additional spew.
Which means somebody has problems with reading comprehension:
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/settings/#debug:
DEBUG
Default: False
A boolean that turns on/off debug mode.
On Qua, 2012-09-05 at 15:24 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Qua, 2012-09-05 at 09:53 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:18 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >> > On Sex, 2012-08-31 at 23:03 -0400, Andre Robatino
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qua, 2012-09-05 at 09:53 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:18 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> > On Sex, 2012-08-31 at 23:03 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
>> >> As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Co
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.11.13 for Testing. This release fixes a bug found
during upgrade with the POSIX Windows Sync plugin.
The new packages and versions are:
389-ds-base 1.2.11.13
NOTE: 1.2.11 will not be available for Fedora 16 or ear
On Qua, 2012-09-05 at 09:53 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:18 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sex, 2012-08-31 at 23:03 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> >> As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 5 (TC5)
> >> is now available for testing. Content
Good day all,
This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Sept 5th)
in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work):
PDT: 1pm
MDT: 2pm
CDT: 3pm
EDT: 4pm
UTC: 8pm
BST: 9pm
CST: 10pm
Current items on the agenda:
1)
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 11:39:31AM +0200, Michal Toman wrote:
> We believe this will help developers to better prioritize their
> work and make debugging easier (crashes in common libraries are
> grouped into a single problem, for each crash versions of affected
> packages/architectures are li
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/351
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/351/0001-Trac-Ticket-351-use-betxn-plugins-by-default.2.patch
Fix description:
In addition to the fixes following the Rich's suggestions (comment 11),
the take 2 patch contains ...
. to register cos_post_op
mercurial-2.3.1 will not build on f18 because of the python-docutils version.
It does build on f17, and also on f19.
f19 has
python-docutils-0.10-0.6.20120824svn7502.fc19.src.rpm
1. Can we update f18 to this version?
or
2. Is there someway to get mercurial built using some kind of build overi
Hello,
Anyone interested in picking up pytrainer maintainership? It has broken
deps as shipped in both F16 and F17 and cannot even be installed. Same
issue is also present in latest F18 Branched report:
> [pytrainer] pytrainer-1.7.2-4.fc18.noarch requires gnome-python2-gtkmozembed
The ticket for
On 5 September 2012 18:48, Simone Caronni wrote:
> %if 0%{?fedora} >= 16 || 0%{?fedora} == 17
> %post
> %endif
Sorry, a typo, the spec file is done this way for the first block:
%if 0%{?fedora} == 16 || 0%{?fedora} == 17
%post
%endif
Thanks,
--Simone
--
You cannot discover new oceans unless
Hello,
I have a weird error that I do not have when building a package in
mock or locally.
When I try to build a package for EPEL6 that has conditionals inside
for checking the distribution it seems that Fedora is always
validated.
Let me explain.
The spec file is structured like this:
%if 0%{
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Henrique Junior wrote:
>
>
> From: Eric Sandeen
>
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
>>Cc: axel.th...@atrpms.net; Patrick Uiterwijk
>>Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2012 12:17 PM
>>Subject: Re: Does anyone know how to contact Axel Thimm (ath...@atrpm
From: Eric Sandeen
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
>Cc: axel.th...@atrpms.net; Patrick Uiterwijk
>Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2012 12:17 PM
>Subject: Re: Does anyone know how to contact Axel Thimm (ath...@atrpms.net)
>
>On 9/5/12 8:07 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
>> Hello,
On 9/5/12 8:07 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Currently I am following the non-responsive maintainer policy[1], and
> have submitted a bugzilla bug for athimm two weeks back, with no
> response until now[2].
> So hereby I ask if anyone on this list knows how to contact him, or if
> Axel
Summary of changes:
34fd40c... update to 0.799 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
Hello,
Currently I am following the non-responsive maintainer policy[1], and
have submitted a bugzilla bug for athimm two weeks back, with no
response until now[2].
So hereby I ask if anyone on this list knows how to contact him, or if
Axel himself could respond?
With kind regards,
Patrick Uiterw
commit 34fd40caf89d5117e1ccf20f6cc955c87a52a1a3
Author: Bill Pemberton
Date: Wed Sep 5 08:58:37 2012 -0400
update to 0.799
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Rose-DB-Object.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
d
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:18 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sex, 2012-08-31 at 23:03 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
>> As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 5 (TC5)
>> is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
>> can be found at https://fedorahosted
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 09:50:31AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones píše v St 05. 09. 2012 v 08:24 +0100:
> > $ bodhi --buildroot-override=febootstrap-3.20-1.fc18 --duration=5
> > --notes="Allow libguestfs to rebuild."
> > Error: buildroot override for u'febootstrap-3.20-1.fc18' alrea
> I'am working on a bug review of uayadeque
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553
>
> can someone give me a hint how to handle license type of files in the
> spec file.
> HMAC-SHA-224/256/384/512 implementation in src/hmac/hmac_sha2.c
> FIPS 180-2 SHA-224/256/384/512 implementatio
On 05.09.2012 11:44, J. Randall Owens wrote:
On 09/05/2012 02:39 AM, Michal Toman wrote:
Greetings everybody!
As you may have noticed, new ABRT 2.0.12 has recently been pushed to
Fedora. . . .
F16, F17, F18,& rawhide? Or just F18& rawhide? Or. . . ?
Ohh, sorry - F17, F18 & Rawhide
M.
I'am working on a bug review of uayadeque
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553
can someone give me a hint how to handle license type of files in the spec file.
HMAC-SHA-224/256/384/512 implementation in src/hmac/hmac_sha2.c
FIPS 180-2 SHA-224/256/384/512 implementation in src/hmac/s
On 09/05/2012 02:44 AM, J. Randall Owens wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 02:39 AM, Michal Toman wrote:
>> Greetings everybody!
>>
>> As you may have noticed, new ABRT 2.0.12 has recently been pushed to
>> Fedora. . . .
>
> F16, F17, F18, & rawhide? Or just F18 & rawhide? Or. . . ?
>
Partial self-reply:
On 09/05/2012 02:39 AM, Michal Toman wrote:
> Greetings everybody!
>
> As you may have noticed, new ABRT 2.0.12 has recently been pushed to
> Fedora. . . .
F16, F17, F18, & rawhide? Or just F18 & rawhide? Or. . . ?
--
J. Randall Owens | http://www.ghiapet.net/
--
devel mailing list
devel@li
Greetings everybody!
As you may have noticed, new ABRT 2.0.12 has recently been pushed to
Fedora. Besides significant changes in reporting workflow, it also uses
the ABRT server to collect what we call uReports (micro-reports).
uReport is a short (usually < 4kB) fingerprint of the crash, with
Richard W.M. Jones píše v St 05. 09. 2012 v 08:24 +0100:
> $ bodhi --buildroot-override=febootstrap-3.20-1.fc18 --duration=5
> --notes="Allow libguestfs to rebuild."
> Error: buildroot override for u'febootstrap-3.20-1.fc18' already exists
>
> It doesn't exist (according to 'bodhi --my-overrides
$ bodhi --buildroot-override=febootstrap-3.20-1.fc18 --duration=5
--notes="Allow libguestfs to rebuild."
Error: buildroot override for u'febootstrap-3.20-1.fc18' already exists
It doesn't exist (according to 'bodhi --my-overrides').
However the package has
(a) fallen out of f18-override yester
33 matches
Mail list logo
