Re: Review requests for guayadeque-0.3.6-svn1830

2012-09-03 Thread Brendan Jones
On 09/03/2012 01:05 PM, Matthias Runge wrote: Martin Gansser schrieb: Hi all, I've just packaged guayadeque - A Audio player and organizer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553 Descripition : Guayadeque is a music management program designed for all music enthusiasts. It is F

Re: should I see a F18 branch?

2012-09-03 Thread Andrew Price
On 03/09/12 23:31, Neal Becker wrote: Ken Dreyer wrote: On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Neal Becker wrote: fedpkg pull Already up-to-date. git branch f12 f13 f14 f15 f16 * f17 master "git pull -a" will grab the f18 branch. Not sure why fedpkg doesn't do it. - Ken $ gi

Re: should I see a F18 branch?

2012-09-03 Thread Ding Yi Chen
- Original Message - > Ken Dreyer wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Neal Becker > > wrote: > >> fedpkg pull > >> Already up-to-date. > >> > >> git branch > >> f12 > >> f13 > >> f14 > >> f15 > >> f16 > >> * f17 > >> master > > > > "git pull -a" will grab the f18

Re: should I see a F18 branch?

2012-09-03 Thread Josh Boyer
On Sep 3, 2012 6:31 PM, "Neal Becker" wrote: > > Ken Dreyer wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > >> fedpkg pull > >> Already up-to-date. > >> > >> git branch > >> f12 > >> f13 > >> f14 > >> f15 > >> f16 > >> * f17 > >> master > > > > "git pull -a" will gr

Re: should I see a F18 branch?

2012-09-03 Thread Neal Becker
Ken Dreyer wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Neal Becker wrote: >> fedpkg pull >> Already up-to-date. >> >> git branch >> f12 >> f13 >> f14 >> f15 >> f16 >> * f17 >> master > > "git pull -a" will grab the f18 branch. Not sure why fedpkg doesn't do it. > > - Ken $ git pull -a

Re: should I see a F18 branch?

2012-09-03 Thread Ken Dreyer
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > fedpkg pull > Already up-to-date. > > git branch > f12 > f13 > f14 > f15 > f16 > * f17 > master "git pull -a" will grab the f18 branch. Not sure why fedpkg doesn't do it. - Ken -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

should I see a F18 branch?

2012-09-03 Thread Neal Becker
I'm just updating Cython to 0.17. fedpkg pull Already up-to-date. git branch f12 f13 f14 f15 f16 * f17 master -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Heads-up: Twisted-12.2.0 landing in rawhide; pseudo-orphaning the package

2012-09-03 Thread Julian Sikorski
Dear all, I have just submitted python-twisted* 12.2.0 builds for rawhide. Please check if everything still works as intended. Having said that, with this update I will no longer be co-maintaning the stack. The reason I joined, telepathy-sunshine, has since been retired and thus it makes little se

Re: xine plans

2012-09-03 Thread Kevin Kofler
Michael J Gruber wrote: > I'm currently messing with xine-ui updates (sync with upstream 0.99.7, > epel6 build, split out xine-check). There were some plans in the past to > move all of xine to rpmfusion and, possibly, build more xine packages > from the same spec. > > Is there any new development

[Bug 849328] perl-Module-Build-0.4003 is available

2012-09-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849328 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-Build-0.40.03-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Build-0.40.03-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You ar

[Bug 849328] perl-Module-Build-0.4003 is available

2012-09-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849328 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar --

rawhide report: 20120903 changes

2012-09-03 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Sep 3 08:15:09 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [almanah] almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.3()(64bit) almanah-0.8.0-7.fc18.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.16()(64bit)

Re: Review requests for guayadeque-0.3.6-svn1830

2012-09-03 Thread Matthias Runge
Martin Gansser schrieb: >Hi all, > >I've just packaged guayadeque - A Audio player and organizer. >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853553 > >Descripition : Guayadeque is a music management program designed for >all music enthusiasts. >It is Full Featured Linux media player that can

Re: Network configuration future

2012-09-03 Thread Olaf Kirch
Hi Miloslav, On Wednesday 29 August 2012 18:42:44 Miloslav Trmač wrote: > Considering that it's not reasonable to expect that the replacement > will cover 100% of the previous functionality, the "old" and "new" > projects will have to live side by side again for some time. So a > switch to a dif

Re: Network configuration future

2012-09-03 Thread Olaf Kirch
On Friday 31 August 2012 02:47:38 Bill Nottingham wrote: > I'm not saying you *can't* do it, but it's also not something to do > lightly. Totally agreed. But what are really the points of maximum stickiness? Obviously, configuration files and command line interfaces. So, for a new network manage

Re: Network configuration future

2012-09-03 Thread Olaf Kirch
On Thursday 30 August 2012 08:55:02 Bill Nottingham wrote: > > The systemd people do have some ideas they've already been kicking around > > for this already... have you seen it? > > To be clear, I'm not really convinced yet that this is something we need... > there is a lot of legacy admin overhe

Re: Network configuration future

2012-09-03 Thread Olaf Kirch
Hi Stephen, On Wednesday 29 August 2012 19:48:29 Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Olaf, I'm very interested to learn more about wicked. Can you perhaps > itemize the set of features available to wicked (current as well as > in-development) that aren't available (or maybe "accessible) in Network > Manag