Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
> Olaf Kirch (o...@suse.de) said:
> > On Wednesday 29 August 2012 21:56:45 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> > > On 08/29/2012 11:58 AM, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> > > > Your feedback is very much welcome!
> > >
> > > The network management/solution of the future
Olaf Kirch (o...@suse.de) said:
> On Wednesday 29 August 2012 21:56:45 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> > On 08/29/2012 11:58 AM, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> > > Your feedback is very much welcome!
> >
> > The network management/solution of the future most likely ( at least
> > will need to ) be something
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852964
Description of problem:
openssh-blacklist is the "Downloader of the openssh keys affected by
CVE-2008-0166" (the Debian OpenSSL key generation issue). It no longer
works as the site it tries to download from is
The url in rpm -qpi:
http://www.b
Hi Adam,
On Thursday 30 August 2012 04:16:23 Adam Williamson wrote:
> > *** Network Manager is just another daemon created for a task
> > which historically often did not need any daemons. It's almost as if
> > the new generation of Unix hackers wants to redo everything -
> > in x10 or x100 times
On Wednesday 29 August 2012 21:56:45 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> On 08/29/2012 11:58 AM, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> > Your feedback is very much welcome!
>
> The network management/solution of the future most likely ( at least
> will need to ) be something that is integrated into ( or with )
> system
On 2012-08-29 6:17, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
We've got Network Manager, which is also doing it's job nicely and
won't
give you any headaches if you prevent it from stepping on anybody
else's
toes. Or try to make it manage a thousand devices, like on System z.
*** Network Manager is just another
Okay...
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Ok, thanks Kevin,
Good to know, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't dropping the ball on
anything
-Zach
On 08/29/2012 03:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:01:52 -0700
Zach Carter wrote:
Hi,
I have rebuilt this package and requested it to be pushed to stable.
Is there
On 08/29/2012 06:43 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Gerry,
>
> You could also use DirectFB's X11 system module, so that you can run
> DirectFB-based applications in a usual X11 window. You can tell
> DirectFB so by using the DFBARGS environment variable:
>
> $ export DFBARGS="system=x11,mode=1280x800"
> (
Tom,
Ok, I tried testing with the following settings:
$ ls -l /dev/tty{,0,1} /dev/fb{,0}
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 3 Aug 21 21:52 /dev/fb -> fb0
crw-rw-rw-. 1 root video 29, 0 Aug 21 21:52 /dev/fb0
crw-rw-rw-. 1 root tty5, 0 Aug 21 21:52 /dev/tty
crw--w. 1 root t
Gerry,
You could also use DirectFB's X11 system module, so that you can run
DirectFB-based applications in a usual X11 window. You can tell
DirectFB so by using the DFBARGS environment variable:
$ export DFBARGS="system=x11,mode=1280x800"
(probably also w/ disable-module=gl)
$./
Nicolas Chauvet
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:01:52 -0700
Zach Carter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have rebuilt this package and requested it to be pushed to stable.
>
> Is there anything else I need to do to get it through and stop the
> nag emails?
>
> Am I missing some update procedure?
We are currently in Alpha Change fr
Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) said:
> On 08/28/2012 08:17 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > The update to guile-2.x has been blocked for almost 1.5 years now:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238
> >
> > Long story short, existing programs are not ready to use guile-2.x, while
>
Hi,
I have rebuilt this package and requested it to be pushed to stable.
Is there anything else I need to do to get it through and stop the nag
emails?
Am I missing some update procedure?
thanks,
-Zach
On 08/29/2012 04:36 AM, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
[schroot]
dchroot-1.4.25
Good day all,
Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today.
For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-08-29/fedora-meeting-1.2012-08-29-19.59.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedo
On 08/29/2012 11:58 AM, Olaf Kirch wrote:
Your feedback is very much welcome!
The network management/solution of the future most likely ( at least
will need to ) be something that is integrated into ( or with )
systemd/Core OS
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:/
On 08/29/2012 02:33 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 08/29/2012 09:25 AM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> DirectFB says that there are Fedora packaging errors which are causing the
>> undefined symbol on XUnlockDisplay and
>> inability to run as normal user.
> Upstream is wrong, btw.
>
> The dlopen problem is
On 08/29/2012 03:16 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 8/29/12 3:06 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Tom Callaway
>> wrote:
>>> I made an updated package (1.6.1) that has these fixes applied and sets
>>> the CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG capability to the dfbinfo binary. (Other DirectF
On 8/29/12 3:06 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
I made an updated package (1.6.1) that has these fixes applied and sets
the CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG capability to the dfbinfo binary. (Other DirectFB
binaries probably need the same magic, but as I am not
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> The core issue behind why dfbinfo doesn't run as a "normal" user is due
> to the fact that the Linux kernel requires CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG to do any
> TTY ioctl() calls. UID 0 (root) has that, but normal users do not. It is
> possible to give a b
On 08/29/2012 09:25 AM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> DirectFB says that there are Fedora packaging errors which are causing the
> undefined symbol on XUnlockDisplay and
> inability to run as normal user.
Upstream is wrong, btw.
The dlopen problem is caused by the fact that they don't pass the
$(X11VDPAU
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 13:58 +0200, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to revive a proposal that I have made a while ago, regarding
> a framework for managing network interfaces. I called it wicked at that time,
> and it's still called that way, but because of potential confusion with WIC
Good day all,
This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Aug 29th)
in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work):
PDT: 1pm
MDT: 2pm
CDT: 3pm
EDT: 4pm
UTC: 8pm
BST: 9pm
CST: 10pm
Current items on the agenda:
1)
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> While I my original motivation in working on this is from a SUSE perspective,
> I believe other Linux distributions can benefit from this as well, and I'd
> be happy to work on this cross-distribution.
>
> Your feedback is very much welco
commit 3101b091b48045ec78842fbecf9ebce06ee1ed0c
Author: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed Aug 29 17:55:38 2012 +0200
Initial import
.gitignore|1 +
perl-XML-Catalog.spec | 50 +
sources |1 +
3 files changed, 52
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-Catalog:
7a69f3cdf0a3ed32f37f8681ea85d08e XML-Catalog-0.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
Hi,
I wonder if one way to deal with the network configuration issue is to
try and help different configuration systems work with each other,
rather than to try and create one system which does everything. Last
time I looked into this there were various things which could be done to
allow peaceful
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> The update to guile-2.x has been blocked for almost 1.5 years now:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238
>
> Long story short, existing programs are not ready to use guile-2.x, while
> newer
> versions of aiselriot (part of GNO
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Excuse me
>
> I want to take it...
You're not sponsored yet. How about I take it, and you work on an
update to the latest. Once we work that out to my satisfaction, I'll
sponsor you and you can be comaintainer. Sound OK?
-J
> --
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:30:34 +0200
Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi a écrit:
>
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847418
> >
> > downgrade to:
> >
> > systemd-188-3.fc18
> >
> > (NOTE: NOT fc19)
>
> Just so that I understand. What version of systemd and kernel should
> Rawhi
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi a écrit:
>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847418
>>
>> downgrade to:
>>
>> systemd-188-3.fc18
>>
>> (NOTE: NOT fc19)
>
> Just so that I understand. What version of systemd and kernel should
> Rawhide users *not
On 08/29/2012 03:17 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On 08/29/2012 01:58 PM, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> Why Did You Do This?!
>
> Do we really need yet another network management thing?
> ===
...
> We've got Network Manager, which is also doin
2012/8/29 Dave Young :
> Hi,
>
> CC tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org and Neil Horman
>
> What's tell the normal process of translating po file?
>
It can be translated online in Transifex [1] or a translator may
download the po file for working offline with it using a po file
editor like poEdit, and t
On 08/28/2012 11:57 AM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 08/27/2012 10:59 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>> Hi Gerry,
>>
>> Try contacting the main dev. mailing-list of DirectFB. I'm sure you'll get
>> an answer there.
>>
>> Btw, DirectFB-1.5.3 is rather old, DirectFB-1.6.1 is rather the latest
>> stable release.
On 08/29/2012 01:58 PM, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> Your feedback is very much welcome!
>
> Regards,
> Olaf
Why Did You Do This?!
Do we really need yet another network management thing?
===
No, not really. We already have the good old
Hi all,
I would like to revive a proposal that I have made a while ago, regarding
a framework for managing network interfaces. I called it wicked at that time,
and it's still called that way, but because of potential confusion with WICD
I'll probably change the name soonishly.
This project has b
Excuse me
I want to take it...
--
*Yours sincerely,*
*Christopher Meng*
Ambassador/Contributor of Fedora Project and many others.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi
I'm orphaning privoxy as I'm not using anymore and need to focus on secondary
archs.
AFAIK it isn't required by any other packages, but needs to be updated to the latest
version if someone decides to pick it up.
Karsten
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
M. M. wrote:
> I'm packaging some themes for GNOME Shell, which are compatible with only
> GNOME 3.4 (i.e. can be installed with success only on Fedora 17).
> What do you think is the best way to act?
Fix the themes to work with the current version? If upstream doesn't do it
(in time), it's your
Are any Fedora developers going to be going to the talk by Arjan on
system updates (https://plus.google.com/114657443111661859546/posts/MGuHZdw2L9R)
at the Linux Plumbers Conference?
It should be interesting?
--
mike c
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproj
Hi,
CC tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org and Neil Horman
What's tell the normal process of translating po file?
Neil, do you remember how to update the po files in kexec-tools before?
On 08/29/2012 04:00 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> On 08/29/2012 12:31 PM, Domingo Becker wrote:
>
>> 2012/8/28 Dave Yo
On 08/29/2012 12:31 PM, Domingo Becker wrote:
> 2012/8/28 Dave Young :
>> On 08/29/2012 10:54 AM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
>>
>>> For translation related issues contact to l10n people on
>>> tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org list. More can be read at
>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N
>>
>>
>> Thanks
42 matches
Mail list logo
