Jerry James wrote:
> I've got two Rawhide VMs, one x86_64, one i686, both otherwise
> identical. I last booted them yesterday and did a yum repo-sync.
> Today, neither of them will boot.
>
> First, systemd complained about being unable to find
> systemd-journal-flush.service. Sure enough, it wasn
Kevin Fenzi a écrit:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847418
>
> downgrade to:
>
> systemd-188-3.fc18
>
> (NOTE: NOT fc19)
Just so that I understand. What version of systemd and kernel should
Rawhide users *not* use to avoid the issue?
I couldn't figure this out by reading the a
Hi,
I currently maintains fusioninventory stack in Fedora / EPEL
fusioninventory-agent
perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-Deploy
perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-ESX
perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-NetDiscovery (to be EOL)
perl-FusionInventory-Agent-Task-NetInventory (new in F18, to be EOL)
perl-Fusi
On 08/28/2012 08:17 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> The update to guile-2.x has been blocked for almost 1.5 years now:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238
>
> Long story short, existing programs are not ready to use guile-2.x, while
> newer
> versions of aiselriot (part of GNOME) need
2012/8/28 Dave Young :
> On 08/29/2012 10:54 AM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
>
>> For translation related issues contact to l10n people on
>> tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org list. More can be read at
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N
>
>
> Thanks very much, will contact i10n list
>
There is a firstboo
On 08/29/2012 10:54 AM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
> For translation related issues contact to l10n people on
> tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org list. More can be read at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N
Thanks very much, will contact i10n list
>
> Thanks,
> Parag.
--
Thanks
Dave
--
devel mail
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on the Fedora/Rhel7 firstboot module, and I have some
> changes to the firstboot module pot files. I wonder who I should cantact
> for these translating things which are visible to end user.
>
For translation related iss
Hi,
I'm working on the Fedora/Rhel7 firstboot module, and I have some
changes to the firstboot module pot files. I wonder who I should cantact
for these translating things which are visible to end user.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks a lot
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproj
hello guy I want to build smuxi irc client for fedora but just wondering
first if anybody is working on it?
http://www.smuxi.org/page/About
Let me know asap
Regards, Adrian.-
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Yes.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847418
>
> downgrade to:
>
> systemd-188-3.fc18
>
> (NOTE: NOT fc19)
>
> then rebuild your initramfs with dracut
Thank you, Kevin! I was hunting through dracut bugs looking for this,
instea
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:43:14 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
> I've got two Rawhide VMs, one x86_64, one i686, both otherwise
> identical. I last booted them yesterday and did a yum repo-sync.
> Today, neither of them will boot.
...snip...
>
> Does anybody recognize the problem?
Yes.
https://bugz
I've got two Rawhide VMs, one x86_64, one i686, both otherwise
identical. I last booted them yesterday and did a yum repo-sync.
Today, neither of them will boot.
First, systemd complained about being unable to find
systemd-journal-flush.service. Sure enough, it wasn't in the
initramfs. So I add
Debarshi Ray wrote:
> The update to guile-2.x has been blocked for almost 1.5 years now:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238
>
> Long story short, existing programs are not ready to use guile-2.x, while
> newer versions of aiselriot (part of GNOME) need it. Creating a
> compat-gu
The update to guile-2.x has been blocked for almost 1.5 years now:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678238
Long story short, existing programs are not ready to use guile-2.x, while newer
versions of aiselriot (part of GNOME) need it. Creating a compat-guile or a
guile2 package can be on
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:37:27 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
> Bodhi seems to be enforcing 7 days in updates-testing for F18. Are we
> going to switch to the 3 day minimum described in
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Pre_Beta?
It's set that way in it's config, but bodhi isn't honoring
# F18 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #5
# Date: 2012-08-29
# Time: 16:00 UTC [1] (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Note: This is the new time for regular blocker review meetings
We'll be running through the alpha blockers and nice-to-haves. The
current list o
Stefano Karapetsas wrote:
>> Rex Dieter wrote:
>>
>> I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
>> communicating and working together.
>>
>> I don't accept it. Dan reacting poorly is a given, and something he
>> (and I
>> with him) are working on.
>>
>> I personally don't
ack.
On 08/27/2012 01:44 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 08/27/2012 10:59 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>
> Hi Gerry,
>
> Try contacting the main dev. mailing-list of DirectFB. I'm sure you'll get an
> answer there.
>
> Btw, DirectFB-1.5.3 is rather old, DirectFB-1.6.1 is rather the latest stable
> release.
>
> -Ilyes
>
>
Thanks Ilyes.
I'll try posting o
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 17:39 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>> On 8/27/12 5:38 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>>> > On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 15:27 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>> >
>
Rex Dieter wrote:
I can understand your frustration, and that you and Dan had trouble
communicating and working together.
I don't accept it. Dan reacting poorly is a given, and something he
(and I
with him) are working on.
I personally don't feel it helps taking your greivances public, as
n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm a Perl developer / sys-admin working for the PacketFence[1] open
source project which has strong RHEL roots.
A few months ago I've switched to Fedora as my desktop and I'm trying
to upstream some of our own packages to improve their quality a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852190
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
Scott Schmit writes:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 09:39:32AM +0200, Miloslav TrmaÄ wrote:
>> This optimizes the migration path at the cost of making the final
>> state ugly; I'm not sure that is a good bargain.
> Once F20 rolls out and F17 goes EOL, maintainers can simply
> s/systemd_post_enable/sy
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Neal Becker wrote:
>
>> I assume this is a known (and temporary problem):
>>
>> fedpkg scratch-build
>> Could not execute scratch_build: database outage
>>
>
> yep - it is coming back in just a tick
It's back.
-J
>
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Neal Becker wrote:
I assume this is a known (and temporary problem):
fedpkg scratch-build
Could not execute scratch_build: database outage
yep - it is coming back in just a tick
-sv
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
I assume this is a known (and temporary problem):
fedpkg scratch-build
Could not execute scratch_build: database outage
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Le Mar 28 août 2012 03:12, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> On 2012-08-25 22:52, M.M. wrote:
>
>> Or is it better to add an explicit "Requires" (for e.g. GNOME Shell
>> 3.4.x) to the Spec files? In such case, is something like "Requires:
>> gnome-shell=3.4.*" allowed to specify all sub-releases belongi
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 17:39 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> On 8/27/12 5:38 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 15:27 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> >
>> >> That said it's probably less work to grab a copy of pango-1.30.
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 17:39 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 8/27/12 5:38 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 15:27 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >
> >> That said it's probably less work to grab a copy of pango-1.30.1 and
> >> just build compat-pangox from that.
> >
> > I would prefe
Hey,
My name is Sebastian Dyroff. I am from Germany, Berlin. I've just
finished my studies of computer science.
I am a Linux user for a decade or so and tried a lot of different
Distros. For a long time I used gentoo (don't know if it is a good idea
to tell here:-) ), but switched to Fedora
On 28/08/12 07:08, Michael Scherer wrote:
>
> Just stating facts as well, that's slightly wrong.
> Wolfgang aka raveit use the login "niceandgently" on github.
>
> The one who accuse Dan mashal of calling him "portuguese noob" is
> ketheriel, aka Nelson Marques, on 23-07-2012.
>
> He also reuse
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 09:39:32AM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > He's not ignoring it, he's saying that on F18+, the expansion of
> > %systemd_post_enable should be exactly the same as the expansion of
> > %systemd_post, i.e. not enabled by
On 28 August 2012 09:39, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> After all, the F17 and F18 spec files will do _different_ things. I
> don't think it's unreasonable that the spec files themselves will be
> different - yes, that may be less convenient than having the same spec
> file for all branches, but allowi
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:11:39 -0400
> Tom Callaway wrote:
>> This is the problem: In F18+, systemd now uses a system-wide policy
>> (which can be overridden) to define what services are enabled, it is
>> no longer hardcoded into each package'
35 matches
Mail list logo
