> "GH" == Garrett Holmstrom writes:
GH> I am pleased that I got a bug report and not an involuntary patch,
GH> as it gives me a chance to take care of special cases and schedule
GH> things appropriately.
I would much have preferred to receive an announcement about what should
be done, some d
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:23:41PM -0400, Lukas Nykryn wrote:
>> Sorry for this mess. After a discussion, we have decided, that the
>> best way would be to create bugs for every packages and then helping
>> creating patches for specfile
On 08/21/2012 01:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:23:41PM -0400, Lukas Nykryn wrote:
Sorry for this mess. After a discussion, we have decided, that the
best way would be to create bugs for every packages and then helping
creating patches for specfiles.
Just to be cle
As a reminder, everyone working within the Fedora project is expected to
abide by the code of conduct (http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct).
If there's an interpersonal conflict that can't be resolved by the
individuals or the specific subset of the project involved, please feel
free to ra
On Tue, 21.08.12 13:24, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Bruno Wolff III writes:
> >>> Yeah, it gets old pretty quick when every time some packages get updated,
> >>> one needs to enable or disable them again.
>
> >> Huh? That doesn't happen
Summary of changes:
f4b79ce... Update to 0.21 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
commit fc781692d330bb3a2c2465967ebcd0b25390aa9d
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue Aug 21 21:00:23 2012 +0100
Update to 0.28
- New upstream release 0.28
- Whitespace in use base is valid
perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec |8 ++--
sources |2 +-
2 files
> "Ri" == Rave it writes:
Ri> For your information. I stoped working for the Mate-Desktop project
Ri> for f18 because for me it is imposssible to to work together with
Ri> Dan Mashal. One of the reason for my decision is this last talk with
Ri> Dan Mashal today.
I've watched a bunch of this
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 13:24:53 -0400,
Tom Lane wrote:
which should not do anything on an update. It would auto-enable if
you were installing the package when it was previously not present,
but that isn't what you're describing. File a bug maybe?
I'll need to keep better track. There are
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-ExtractUse:
5ad0c19fa47fe9c338e7dac76b0ad18f Module-ExtractUse-0.28.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
For your information.
I stoped working for the Mate-Desktop project for f18 because for me
it is imposssible to to work together with Dan Mashal.
One of the reason for my decision is this last talk with Dan Mashal
today.
Unterhaltung mit Dan Mashal am Di 21 Aug 2012 10:03:44 CEST:
(10:03:
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON-0.14-1.fc19' was created pointing
to:
10c7e3f... Update to 0.14
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/p
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON-0.14-1.fc18' was created pointing
to:
10c7e3f... Update to 0.14
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/p
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Dave Anderson wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>>
>> > Is there something I need to change so that a simple "fedpkg build"
>> > will work again?
>>
>> I believe you need a new version of fedpkg and pyrpkg. It should just
>> be using "rawhide" instead of "
- Original Message -
>
> > Is there something I need to change so that a simple "fedpkg build"
> > will work again?
>
> I believe you need a new version of fedpkg and pyrpkg. It should just
> be using "rawhide" instead of "dist-rawhide".
>
> --
> Jesse Keating
> Fedora -- Freedom is
commit 10c7e3fe61851cb0db8c108479ec5114bb2ca491
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue Aug 21 20:27:32 2012 +0100
Update to 0.14
- New upstream release 0.14
- Added minimum perl version (5.006)
- Reworked Makefile.PL for clarity
- Implemented Perl::Critic suggestions
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON:
b84866b99e142d63e75bb08a55e3ad26 Test-CPAN-Meta-JSON-0.14.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorap
On 08/21/2012 12:24 PM, Dave Anderson wrote:
Is there something I need to change so that a simple "fedpkg build"
will work again?
I believe you need a new version of fedpkg and pyrpkg. It should just
be using "rawhide" instead of "dist-rawhide".
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feat
For some reason when I tried to build my package in the master branch
with "fedpkg build", it failed with the error message:
Could not initiate build: Unknown build target: dist-rawhide
It has always worked OK in the past, as recently as July 1st.
Here's the output:
$ fedpkg -v build
Cr
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:23:41PM -0400, Lukas Nykryn wrote:
> Sorry for this mess. After a discussion, we have decided, that the
> best way would be to create bugs for every packages and then helping
> creating patches for specfiles.
Just to be clear, I had no problem at all with the bugs being
On 08/21/2012 05:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
which should not do anything on an update. It would auto-enable if
you were installing the package when it was previously not present,
but that isn't what you're describing. File a bug maybe?
regards, tom lane
It's a know ( and
On 08/21/2012 07:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 2012-08-21 9:36, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 08/21/2012 04:22 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
hi,
i need help, because the AutoQA DepCheck fails on the package
speed-dreams,but the package was pushed anyway.
AutoQA DepCheck log:
http://autoqa.fedoraproject.or
A version of the new blocker tracking app has been up for a little
while but the code is finally public and the app has a new home!
The blocker app now lives at:
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/
A quick link to the current release blockers is at:
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/cu
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Nottingham"
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 5:59:29 PM
Subject: Re: Mass changes to packaging
Jason L Tibbitts III (ti...@math.uh.edu) said:
> > "RWMJ" == Richard W M Jones writes:
>
> RWMJ> I just r
Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack.
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Bruno Wolff III writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruno Wolff III writes:
>>> Yeah, it gets old pretty quick when every time some packages get updated,
>>> one needs to enable or disable them again.
>> Huh? That doesn't happen given the current (F16/F17) scriptlets AFAICS.
>> They don't touch the s
ack
On 08/21/2012 12:09 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
Mark Reynolds
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fe
# F18 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #4
# Date: 2012-08-22
# Time: 16:00 UTC [1] (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Note: This is the new time for regular blocker review meetings
We'll be running through the beta blockers and nice-to-haves. The
current list of
On 08/21/2012 05:08 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 21.08.12 16:52, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
>On 08/21/2012 02:52 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >However, the person who is sending these bugs reports is
> >(a) in a much better position to change the packages b
On 2012-08-21 9:36, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 08/21/2012 04:22 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
hi,
i need help, because the AutoQA DepCheck fails on the package
speed-dreams,but the package was pushed anyway.
AutoQA DepCheck log:
http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/418027-autotest/virt04.qa/depcheck/res
> "JB" == Josh Boyer writes:
JB> Right. There's a bug open for it somewhere.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826707
- J<
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Panu Matilainen
wrote:
> Dunno about the System.map (other than I've always relied on the ones in
> /boot), but as for the timestamps, kernel-devel itself causes that as it
> runs hardlink on itself at package post-installation.
Right. There's a bug open for it s
On Tue, 21.08.12 16:52, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 08/21/2012 02:52 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >However, the person who is sending these bugs reports is
> >(a) in a much better position to change the packages because they
> >understand the problem and the solutio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754689
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fedora
Aloas,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:22:10AM -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >
> > hi,
> > i need help, because the AutoQA DepCheck fails on the package
> > speed-dreams,but the package was pushed anyway.
> > AutoQA DepCheck log:
> > http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/418027-autotest/virt04.qa/depc
On 08/21/2012 07:49 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
I've noticed that immediately after installing the kernel-devel package, the
mtimes on many of its files fail verification, for example
[root@compaq-pc ~]# rpm -V kernel-devel-3.5.2-1.fc17.x86_64
...T./usr/src/kernels/3.5.2-1.fc17.x86_64/Kcon
On 08/21/2012 02:52 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
However, the person who is sending these bugs reports is
(a) in a much better position to change the packages because they
understand the problem and the solution, and (b) ought to take on this
work because that's part of whatever feature/cleanup/
I've noticed that immediately after installing the kernel-devel package, the
mtimes on many of its files fail verification, for example
[root@compaq-pc ~]# rpm -V kernel-devel-3.5.2-1.fc17.x86_64
...T./usr/src/kernels/3.5.2-1.fc17.x86_64/Kconfig
...T./usr/src/kernels/3.5.2-1.fc17.x
On 08/21/2012 04:22 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
hi,
i need help, because the AutoQA DepCheck fails on the package
speed-dreams,but the package was pushed anyway.
AutoQA DepCheck log:
http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/418027-autotest/virt04.qa/depcheck/results/speed-dreams-2.1.0-1.html
the probl
Le 21/08/2012 17:04, Tom Lane a écrit :
> I'd like to see these macros back-ported into F17 and F16 RPM to remove
> this objection. If that doesn't happen, I'm going to resist using them
> in my spec files until they are in all active Fedora branches.
+1
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:25:32 -0400,
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruno Wolff III writes:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:59:29 -0400,
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Presets are a valuable new feature for both distribution constructors
and administrators - rather than having a single hardcoded policy *in
the
Bruno Wolff III writes:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:59:29 -0400,
>Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Presets are a valuable new feature for both distribution constructors
>> and administrators - rather than having a single hardcoded policy *in
>> the packages* about what starts and doesn't start (and
From d8822be083b6ffd4c21004ede8cd14a8246c079c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:00:21 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] coverity - mbo dead code - winsync leaks, deadcode, null
check, test code
This fixes the following issues:
13060 Logically dead code
In memberof_t
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:59:29 -0400,
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Presets are a valuable new feature for both distribution constructors
and administrators - rather than having a single hardcoded policy *in
the packages* about what starts and doesn't start (and requires rebuilding
to fix), preset
On 08/21/2012 10:04 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Richard W.M. Jones" writes:
>> I just received about a dozen bugs like this:
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:16:42PM +, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850364
>> [...]
>>> Summary: Introduce new systemd-rpm mac
Jason L Tibbitts III (ti...@math.uh.edu) said:
> > "RWMJ" == Richard W M Jones writes:
>
> RWMJ> I just received about a dozen bugs like this:
>
> Yep, someone has taken it upon themselves to mass-file a bunch of
> unnecessary tickets.
>
> When FPC makes guidelines changes, they aren't gen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754689
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CGI-Session-4.35-10.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Session-4.35-10.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
I see you are already in packagers group, so if you want to take
co-maintainership of gscan2pdf package you should apply your request in
packagedb:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gscan2pdf
And you can also try to contact user rakesh, who is already a
co-maintainer accordingly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754689
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CGI-Session-4.35-12.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Session-4.35-12.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754689
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CGI-Session-4.35-14.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Session-4.35-14.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754689
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
commit 4a685233201ef56286fa6ec61575d926944b6f97
Author: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Tue Jun 12 14:06:42 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-CGI-Session.spec | 22 --
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-CGI-Session.spec b/perl-CGI-S
commit 1be3cb9dec8b06db5a17518a9d98fc9cef475049
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Aug 21 17:08:46 2012 +0200
Fix deprecated use of qw//
CGI-Session-4.35-qw.patch | 41 +
perl-CGI-Session.spec |6 +-
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 dele
commit 15024cdb3b80667d59e182fda6bbb91ee987be2c
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Tue Jan 17 22:29:01 2012 +0100
Add BR: perl(Digest::MD5) (Fix mass rebuild FTBS).
perl-CGI-Session.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-CGI-Session.spec b/per
On 08/21/2012 05:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
"
I'd like to see these macros back-ported into F17 and F16 RPM to remove
this objection. If that doesn't happen, I'm going to resist using them
in my spec files until they are in all active Fedora branches.
regards, tom lane
+1
"Richard W.M. Jones" writes:
> I just received about a dozen bugs like this:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:16:42PM +, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850364
> [...]
>> Summary: Introduce new systemd-rpm macros in watchdog spec file
> [...]
Yeah, I got
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754689
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
> "RWMJ" == Richard W M Jones writes:
RWMJ> I just received about a dozen bugs like this:
Yep, someone has taken it upon themselves to mass-file a bunch of
unnecessary tickets.
When FPC makes guidelines changes, they aren't generally accompanied by
some mandate that existing packages be cha
I just received about a dozen bugs like this:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:16:42PM +, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850364
[...]
>Summary: Introduce new systemd-rpm macros in watchdog spec file
[...]
> Fedora 18 changes the way how to work w
On Mon, 20.08.12 13:49, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Daniel Drake (d...@laptop.org) said:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm porting olpc-dm to F18 /
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DisplayManagerRework
> >
> > Thanks for the good documentation.
> >
> > The only detail that I'm u
>
> hi,
> i need help, because the AutoQA DepCheck fails on the package
> speed-dreams,but the package was pushed anyway.
> AutoQA DepCheck log:
> http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/418027-autotest/virt04.qa/depcheck/results/speed-dreams-2.1.0-1.html
>
> the problem was already discussed on
commit e44e218c9cbf9c8d9341f41de8f2a7e6026bd851
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Aug 21 15:54:59 2012 +0200
Run-require Exporter
perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec b/perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec
index abbde97..
hi,
i need help, because the AutoQA DepCheck fails on the package speed-dreams,but
the package was pushed anyway.
AutoQA DepCheck log:
http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/418027-autotest/virt04.qa/depcheck/results/speed-dreams-2.1.0-1.html
the problem was already discussed on
http://forums.
I'm going to wrangle the GNOME 3.5.90 bodhi update again for packages
that have not opted out. If you either fix up a mclazy build for a
package you own or do your own build, please add the build ID to
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9waFJFZmgyQzBuN2VxU0lxbHc
and I'll
> From: Adam Williamson
> the other probable cause of sluggish performance in F18 is the old debug
> kernel issue. Remember, prior to Beta, most kernel builds have debugging
> enabled, which ever since 2.39 or so has been _very_ slow compared to
> non-debug modes (much more so than used to b
Hello,
I'd like to ask for assistance getting package "gscan2pdf" updated. I
reported a bug two months ago (835685) but it didn't get attention.
One month ago gscan2pdf upstream was updated to 1.0.6, but fedora still
uses the four months old version 1.0.4.
I've built the newer 1.0.6 locally, no
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/21/2012 12:00 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>
>> Hello, all.
>>
>> Hans, the ode maintainer, has asked me to implement and coordinate the
>> upgrade of ode to the current release, 0.12.
>>
>> The affected packages, so far as we've dete
Hi,
On 08/21/2012 12:00 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Hello, all.
Hans, the ode maintainer, has asked me to implement and coordinate the
upgrade of ode to the current release, 0.12.
The affected packages, so far as we've determined, are delelict,
machineball, ompl, stormbaancoureur, xmoto and taoframe
68 matches
Mail list logo
