On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 06:28:53PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4091/4384091/build.log
>
> The problem is that Fedora 18 currently ships with python-
> docutils-0.10-0.2.20120730svn7490.fc18. It works when downgrading to python-
> docutils-0.8.1-3.fc17.
On 2012-08-18 16:09, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
I ran yum distro-sync command but encountered dependencies issue
related to shotwell and ffmpeg from RPM Fusion which I removed them.
Applying systemctl enable --force gdm.service was cumbersome with
polkit and selinux policies problem where I had to
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4091/4384091/build.log
The problem is that Fedora 18 currently ships with python-
docutils-0.10-0.2.20120730svn7490.fc18. It works when downgrading to python-
docutils-0.8.1-3.fc17.
So what to do about it?
The discussion is here:
http://www.selenic.
Hello, all.
Hans, the ode maintainer, has asked me to implement and coordinate the
upgrade of ode to the current release, 0.12.
The affected packages, so far as we've determined, are delelict,
machineball, ompl, stormbaancoureur, xmoto and taoframework. Hans and
I own the majority of this list,
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-08-20)
===
Meeting started by mjg59 at 17:02:31 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-08-20/fesco.2012-08-20-17.02.log.html
.
Meeting summary
One of the projects accepted as part of Fedora's participation in the
Google Summer of Code was an effort to create a site highlighting the
Fedora ruby-sig's work around packaging the stack, and to provide
tooling to cross-reference gem and rpm metadata and assist in the
migration process.
The stu
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= writes:
> Is there any chance that 9.2 will be available for F18?
I'm holding off until there is a 9.2.0 release, or at least an RC
release, but I do very much want it to be in F18.
regards, tom lane
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 18 Alpha.
Wednesday, August 22, 2012 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT/23:00 CEST)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine
Daniel Drake (d...@laptop.org) said:
> Hi,
>
> I'm porting olpc-dm to F18 /
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DisplayManagerRework
>
> Thanks for the good documentation.
>
> The only detail that I'm unclear about is this one:
>
> # Add the following line only if the DM can do Plymouth
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 18 Alpha.
Wednesday, August 22, 2012 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT/23:00 CEST)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 18:38:33 +0200,
Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I am aware that F18 is a special release - base for a new RHEL, so it
is possible that you will not want to put there not yet released
software. PostgreSQL 9.2 does not have any true revolutionary
features, but it has quite
On 08/20/2012 04:38 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I am aware that F18 is a special release - base for a new RHEL, so it
is possible that you will not want to put there not yet released
software. PostgreSQL 9.2 does not have any true revolutionary
features, but it has quite a long list of impr
Two (deprecated) functions were removed from libxcb-util, and the soname
has been bumped to match. The following (binary) packages are affected:
boinc-manager
i3
startup-notification
xcb-util-image
xorg-x11-drv-intel
That last one is a touch unexpected. At any rate, I'll kick rebuilds
for th
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 05:35:07PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > If I give negative karma, that's because I tested the update and
> > found it didn't work.
>
> Why would you do that instead of retracting the update?
Actually because I'd forgot you could do that. Yes
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/429
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/429/0001-Ticket-429-Add-nsslapd-readonly-to-schema.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
Hi,
I am aware that F18 is a special release - base for a new RHEL, so it
is possible that you will not want to put there not yet released
software. PostgreSQL 9.2 does not have any true revolutionary
features, but it has quite a long list of improvements
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/stati
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849703
Bug ID: 849703
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: 16
Priority: unspecified
CC: cw...@alumni.drew.edu, iarn...@gmail.com,
jpl
Hi,
I'm porting olpc-dm to F18 /
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DisplayManagerRework
Thanks for the good documentation.
The only detail that I'm unclear about is this one:
# Add the following line only if the DM can do Plymouth internally
Conflicts=plymouth-quit.service
What does it m
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #888 F18 Feature: UEFI Secure Boot -
h
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> If I give negative karma, that's because I tested the update and
> found it didn't work.
Why would you do that instead of retracting the update?
Björn Persson
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
Is there a reason why python-wtforms is still at version 0.6.3, even in
rawhide, while version 1.0.1 has been released end of February 2012?
--
--Jos Vos
--X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
--Amsterdam, The Netherlands| Fax: +31 20 6948204
-
Summary of changes:
70e4f86... Initial import (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
Summary of changes:
70e4f86... Initial import (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
Summary of changes:
70e4f86... Initial import (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
commit 1345661601c8f847cfaf0f268a9899ec96b3710d
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Mon Aug 20 16:03:56 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate.spec |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate.spec
commit 8f47c61f330337dbb89c45e55c0e8314863ea5a4
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Mon Aug 20 15:58:45 2012 +0200
Modernize spec file
perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate.spec | 24 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engi
Hi all,
With Fedora having automatic multiseat support, I tried it and had the
following issues
We've encountered some issues I would consider as somehow security
(not like root access, but one user can interfer other users) ones :
a) In Gnome you can login as the same user on different seats
Björn Persson xn--rombobjrn-67a.se> writes:
> If Bodhi were to be designed for proxy karma it should allow the
> maintainer unlimited karma points so that they could act as a proxy for
> more than one user. Allowing one proxy karma point but not more than one
> would be a quite arbitrary restrict
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 12:37 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18
>>
>> I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means
>> my karma doesn't count
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 12:37 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18
>
> I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means
> my karma doesn't count ...
>
> IMO this change makes the karma system (even) wo
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:23:26PM +0200, Julian Leyh wrote:
> If you submit it, it means you already tested and approved it. Karma
> from you gives no new (quality) information about the package. It
> should be tested by independent people.
Not at all. I might not be able to test the update, eg.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:17:59PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 20.8.2012 13:37, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> >https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18
> >
> >I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means
> >my karma doesn't count
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Furthermore, a not-inconsequential consideration is proxy-karma. For
> example, I have in the past occasionally given karma +1 (and -1) on my
> own packages from users that did not have Fedora accounts (or couldn't
> manage to defeat the ogre that is FAS's CAPTCHA).
If B
2012/8/20 Andre Robatino :
> Julian Leyh vgai.de> writes:
>
>>
>> 2012/8/20 Richard W.M. Jones redhat.com>:
>> >
>> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18
>> >
>> > I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means
>> > my karma doesn'
- Original Message -
> Julian Leyh vgai.de> writes:
>
> >
> > 2012/8/20 Richard W.M. Jones redhat.com>:
> > >
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18
> > >
> > > I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing
> > > means
> >
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 12:28 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Julian Leyh vgai.de> writes:
>
> >
> > 2012/8/20 Richard W.M. Jones redhat.com>:
> > >
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18
> > >
> > > I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the
Julian Leyh vgai.de> writes:
>
> 2012/8/20 Richard W.M. Jones redhat.com>:
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18
> >
> > I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means
> > my karma doesn't count ...
> >
> > IMO this change
2012/8/20 Richard W.M. Jones :
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18
>
> I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means
> my karma doesn't count ...
>
> IMO this change makes the karma system (even) worse than before.
>
> Rich.
If
Dne 20.8.2012 13:37, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18
I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means
my karma doesn't count ...
IMO this change makes the karma system (even) worse than before.
Ri
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18
I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means
my karma doesn't count ...
IMO this change makes the karma system (even) worse than before.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Ha
d me.
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20120820
The current proposed agenda is included below.
== Proposed Agenda Topics ==
1. F18 status, mini blocker review
2. AutoQA updat
41 matches
Mail list logo
