Re: [HEADS-UP] move eject to util-linux, retire volname

2012-08-16 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 09:10 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > OT: > > I've noticed that fedoraproject wiki has a page "How to Create an RPM > Package" [1]. > > In this page,we can see eject is an example of spec instruction,should we > remove it and replace with another spec file? It's a wiki, ju

[Test-Announce] Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 3 (TC3) Available Now!

2012-08-16 Thread Andre Robatino
As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 3 (TC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5284#comment:7 . Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing

preteen entertainment

2012-08-16 Thread Ralph Willie
interested in teen & preteen exotic activity - pic & videos -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[HEADS-UP] move eject to util-linux, retire volname

2012-08-16 Thread Christopher Meng
OT: I've noticed that fedoraproject wiki has a page "How to Create an RPM Package" [1]. In this page,we can see eject is an example of spec instruction,should we remove it and replace with another spec file? [1] -https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package -- *Yours sincerely

FUDCon EMEA, Paris 2012, any FabLab idea?

2012-08-16 Thread Kévin Raymond
Hi there, Our FUDCon would be for 3 days, with the last 2 at the "Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie", a building in Paris dedicated to opening minds to sciences. They are actually building a FabLab: they have few makerbots (like a 3D printer) and some other goodies. Do you see something that w

Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17

2012-08-16 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 09:06 -0700, John Reiser wrote: > I disagree with the resource allocation decision that RV280 is not worthy > of the attention that is necessary to provide the functionality required by > Gnome3. Of the approximately nine functionally different generations of radeons on the

Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17

2012-08-16 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:21:16 -0700, John Reiser wrote: On 08/16/2012 08:52 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:13:14 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: Even where you guys couldn't get stuff working, I have gotten work around advice. For example, Airlie told me how to dis

Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17

2012-08-16 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:28:43PM -0700, John Reiser wrote: > Something good enough so that the combination of {kernel, Xorg server, > Xorg device driver} would satisfy Gnome3's desires for a display > that did not suffer fallback mode. Vesa should already be running llvmpipe and not triggering

Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17

2012-08-16 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 12:28 -0700, John Reiser wrote: > On 08/16/2012 11:55 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:31:39AM -0700, John Reiser wrote: > >> What about a "KMS vesafb"? > > > What would a KMS vesafb even be? > > Something good enough so that the combination of {kern

Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17

2012-08-16 Thread John Reiser
On 08/16/2012 11:55 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:31:39AM -0700, John Reiser wrote: > >> The wiki page says that the ServerKMSDrivers are 100% implemented, >> so they should be testable in F-18 Alpha. >> However, the wiki page also says "MGA SE or AST" only. >> What about

Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17

2012-08-16 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:31:39AM -0700, John Reiser wrote: > The wiki page says that the ServerKMSDrivers are 100% implemented, > so they should be testable in F-18 Alpha. > However, the wiki page also says "MGA SE or AST" only. > What about a "KMS vesafb"? What would a KMS vesafb even be? --

Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17

2012-08-16 Thread John Reiser
On 08/16/2012 08:52 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:13:14 -0400, > Adam Jackson wrote: > Even where you guys couldn't get stuff working, I have gotten work around > advice. For example, Airlie told me how to disable AGP in order to prevent > lockups on my rv280. Other

Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17

2012-08-16 Thread John Reiser
On 08/16/2012 07:52 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 07:47 -0700, John Reiser wrote: > >> New Radeon 9250 cards [RV280] were advertised by Fry's Electronics on August >> 3; >> advantages: $50 cheap, perhaps low profile, perhaps available in AGP. >> There are thousands of such cards

Re: Boost.Thread in Boost 1.50

2012-08-16 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 16:05:35 +0200, Petr Machata wrote: So if you had to put in any hacks to have your script detect Boost.Thread, or to link one of the binaries, it should shortly be possible to remove them. Thanks for this update. I had one case where upstream had already addressed t

Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17

2012-08-16 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:13:14 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: Yeah, sorry that the devices that need the most work are the ones that get the most work. In the future we'll be sure to focus on end-of-lifed hardware with feature-complete drivers. Even where you guys couldn't get stuff working,

[perl-Sys-MemInfo/el5] Add BuildRoot for el5

2012-08-16 Thread Orion Poplawski
commit 7b2c0b989767b751f8edeb29b9bf3cffe1b98065 Author: Orion Poplawski Date: Thu Aug 16 09:14:30 2012 -0600 Add BuildRoot for el5 perl-Sys-MemInfo.spec |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Sys-MemInfo.spec b/perl-Sys-MemInfo.spec index 790b301.

Re: [HEADS-UP] move eject to util-linux, retire volname

2012-08-16 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 03:53:36PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > > The new util-linux 2.22 release contains eject(1) command, it means > that we can retire the original eject package (with inactive upstream). > > The small disadvantage is that util-linux does not implement command > volname(1) fr

[perl-Scalar-List-Utils] Correct dependencies

2012-08-16 Thread Petr Pisar
commit f2f0b8cf54e928fc7810ecdeba7d856e3cf96d1e Author: Petr Písař Date: Thu Aug 16 16:51:59 2012 +0200 Correct dependencies perl-Scalar-List-Utils.spec | 16 +++- 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Scalar-List-Utils.spec b/perl-Scalar-Li

Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17

2012-08-16 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 07:47 -0700, John Reiser wrote: > New Radeon 9250 cards [RV280] were advertised by Fry's Electronics on August > 3; > advantages: $50 cheap, perhaps low profile, perhaps available in AGP. > There are thousands of such cards appearing in used equipment channels > because of t

Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17

2012-08-16 Thread John Reiser
On 08/16/2012 07:13 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 09:11 -0700, John Reiser wrote: >> In practice for the last 2 years, I notice that X11 pays little attention >> to anything except the "big 3": current Radeon, nVidia, and Intel graphics. >> "3D" [alpha blending, etc.] has taken d

Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17

2012-08-16 Thread John Reiser
On 08/16/2012 06:24 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: >> This is an ordinary bug, probably in some X11 driver, perhaps >> mach64_drv. >> In practice for the last 2 years, I notice that X11 pays little >> attention >> to anything except the "big 3": current Radeon, nVidia, and Intel >> graphics. >> "3D" [a

Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17

2012-08-16 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 09:11 -0700, John Reiser wrote: > > In the X.log I see: > > > > [ 182.375] Backtrace: > > [ 182.375] 0: Xorg (xorg_backtrace+0x36) [0x464d46] > > [ 182.375] 1: Xorg (0x40+0x69d99) [0x469d99] > > [ 182.375] 2: /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x7f315a2bf000

Boost.Thread in Boost 1.50

2012-08-16 Thread Petr Machata
Hi there, if you had problems with linking or detection of Boost.Thread due to a message that looks similar to this: /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccAv0B8G.o: undefined reference to symbol '_ZN5boost6system15system_categoryEv' /usr/bin/ld: note: '_ZN5boost6system15system_categoryEv' is defined in DSO /

[perl-Readonly-XS] Specify all dependencies

2012-08-16 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 6c5b0bb048cc3e5998d5d151579567da35dad5dc Author: Petr Písař Date: Thu Aug 16 15:54:28 2012 +0200 Specify all dependencies perl-Readonly-XS.spec |7 ++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Readonly-XS.spec b/perl-Readonly-XS.spec index 275b

[HEADS-UP] move eject to util-linux, retire volname

2012-08-16 Thread Karel Zak
The new util-linux 2.22 release contains eject(1) command, it means that we can retire the original eject package (with inactive upstream). The small disadvantage is that util-linux does not implement command volname(1) from the eject package. The volname returns the volume name for a device

Re: twolame - legal

2012-08-16 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > I happened to notice that twolame is currently on rpmfusion. Is there a > legal reason for that? > > twolame is an MP2 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer II) encoder (not mp3), which seems to > be a free (as free of patents) codec. There was a similar discu

Re: twolame - legal

2012-08-16 Thread Tom Callaway
On 08/16/2012 05:27 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > I happened to notice that twolame is currently on rpmfusion. Is there a > legal reason for that? > > twolame is an MP2 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer II) encoder (not mp3), which seems > to be a free (as free of patents) codec. There was a similar discussion > o

Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17

2012-08-16 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
> This is an ordinary bug, probably in some X11 driver, perhaps > mach64_drv. > In practice for the last 2 years, I notice that X11 pays little > attention > to anything except the "big 3": current Radeon, nVidia, and Intel > graphics. > "3D" [alpha blending, etc.] has taken developer resources awa

twolame - legal

2012-08-16 Thread Nikos Roussos
I happened to notice that twolame is currently on rpmfusion. Is there a legal reason for that? twolame is an MP2 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer II) encoder (not mp3), which seems to be a free (as free of patents) codec. There was a similar discussion on Debian and they concluded that it's ok to have it on th