Re: Doesn’t LDD break no-content rule?

2012-08-11 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "MC" == Matěj Cepl writes: MC> (sorry, once more, this time to the correct address) And now a public reply MC> I thought that the rule is that Fedora packages shouldn't contain MC> just a pure content. That is incorrect, pretty obviously if you think about it. I mean, how is man-pag

Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-11 Thread Dennis Gilmore
The target is f18-candidate it tags the resulting builds into f18 until we switch bodhi on at alpha freeze -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. Richard Shaw wrote: On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 16:27:28 -0500 > Rich

Re: Doesn’t LDD break no-content rule?

2012-08-11 Thread Matěj Cepl
(sorry, once more, this time to the correct address) On 11/08/12 23:03, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: Maybe you should tell us why you believe it is. I don't see how it violates any of the rules for content. I thought that the rule is that Fedora packages shouldn't contain just a pure content.

Re: DisplayManagerRework: how to handle upgrades?

2012-08-11 Thread alekcejk
Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sat, 11.08.12 21:54, alekc...@googlemail.com (alekc...@googlemail.com) > wrote: > >> Rex Dieter wrote: >> >> > OK, so we have >> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DisplayManagerRework#How_To_Test >> > >> > that tells one how to enable the display manager

Re: New bodhi release in production

2012-08-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:20:35 +0200 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Luke Macken wrote: > > - The submitter of an update can no longer effect the karma (Till > > Maas) > > Uh, last I checked, FESCo had agreed that this should NOT be enforced > by the software because it is legitimate for the submitter to gi

Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:36:45 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > What!?!?! Ok, I know I wasn't seeing things yesterday. I KNOW it was > in f18-candidate otherwise OpenImageIO wouldn't have failed to build. > Must have gotten moved somehow? I can't think of any reason it would have... > Well I had alre

Re: DisplayManagerRework: how to handle upgrades?

2012-08-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 11.08.12 21:54, alekc...@googlemail.com (alekc...@googlemail.com) wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: > > > OK, so we have > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DisplayManagerRework#How_To_Test > > > > that tells one how to enable the display manager of your choice, via > > systemctl enabl

Re: DisplayManagerRework: how to handle upgrades?

2012-08-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 11.08.12 11:23, Rex Dieter (rdie...@math.unl.edu) wrote: > OK, so we have > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DisplayManagerRework#How_To_Test > > that tells one how to enable the display manager of your choice, via > systemctl enable --force xyzdm.service > > But, how to handle

Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-11 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 16:27:28 -0500 > Richard Shaw wrote: > >> Ok, I'm sure I did something wrong but I'm not exactly sure what I was >> supposed to do... >> >> Due to Boost 1.50 I had a chain of libraries that needed rebuilding: >> >> blender

Re: Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 16:27:28 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > Ok, I'm sure I did something wrong but I'm not exactly sure what I was > supposed to do... > > Due to Boost 1.50 I had a chain of libraries that needed rebuilding: > > blender -> OpenImageIO -> Field3D > > I've been able to rebuild the r

Fixing boost 1.50 issues while branching issues

2012-08-11 Thread Richard Shaw
Ok, I'm sure I did something wrong but I'm not exactly sure what I was supposed to do... Due to Boost 1.50 I had a chain of libraries that needed rebuilding: blender -> OpenImageIO -> Field3D I've been able to rebuild the rawhide ones (except for a separate boost issue with blender) but I'm not

Re: Doesn’t LDD break no-content rule?

2012-08-11 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "MC" == Matej Cepl writes: MC> Isn't it breaking MC> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content MC> ? Maybe you should tell us why you believe it is. I don't see how it violates any of the rules for content. - J< -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.

Re: DisplayManagerRework: how to handle upgrades?

2012-08-11 Thread Rex Dieter
Rex Dieter wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: > >> OK, so we have >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DisplayManagerRework#How_To_Test >> >> that tells one how to enable the display manager of your choice, via >> systemctl enable --force xyzdm.service >> >> But, how to handle upgrades? (or is t

Doesn’t LDD break no-content rule?

2012-08-11 Thread Matej Cepl
According to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ldd-pdf is Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format Isn't it breaking https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content ? Matěj -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedor

Re: DisplayManagerRework: spin presets for DM

2012-08-11 Thread Rex Dieter
alekc...@googlemail.com wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: > >> OK, so we have >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DisplayManagerRework#How_To_Test >> >> that tells one how to enable the display manager of your choice, via >> systemctl enable --force xyzdm.service >> >> But, how to handle upgra

Re: DisplayManagerRework: how to handle upgrades?

2012-08-11 Thread alekcejk
Rex Dieter wrote: > OK, so we have > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DisplayManagerRework#How_To_Test > > that tells one how to enable the display manager of your choice, via > systemctl enable --force xyzdm.service > > But, how to handle upgrades? (or is this case already handled someh

Bodhi issues

2012-08-11 Thread Orion Poplawski
I just got: 500 Internal error The server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it from fulfilling the request. Powered by CherryPy 2.3.0 submitting a karma update to an update. It did take something because I got email(s) of my comments -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager

Re: DisplayManagerRework: how to handle upgrades?

2012-08-11 Thread Rex Dieter
Rex Dieter wrote: > OK, so we have > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DisplayManagerRework#How_To_Test > > that tells one how to enable the display manager of your choice, via > systemctl enable --force xyzdm.service > > But, how to handle upgrades? (or is this case already handled someh

Re: New bodhi release in production

2012-08-11 Thread Kevin Kofler
Luke Macken wrote: > - The submitter of an update can no longer effect the karma (Till Maas) Uh, last I checked, FESCo had agreed that this should NOT be enforced by the software because it is legitimate for the submitter to give karma by proxy when an anonymous tester has done the required test

DisplayManagerRework: how to handle upgrades?

2012-08-11 Thread Rex Dieter
OK, so we have https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DisplayManagerRework#How_To_Test that tells one how to enable the display manager of your choice, via systemctl enable --force xyzdm.service But, how to handle upgrades? (or is this case already handled somehow?) Off the top of my head, p

Headups: mysql-connector-c++ 1.1.1 with soname bump

2012-08-11 Thread Remi Collet
New mysql-connector-c++ version 1.1.1 provides libmysqlcppconn.so.6 According to repoquery, no package requires it. So I plan to upgrade to this new version in all branches. This will alow me to update MySQL Workbench to 5.2.41 and to switch back to system library (instead of forked bundled one)