-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Fri, 03 Aug 2012 18:02:26 +0200
Patrick Monnerat escribió:
> On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 00:58 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> > while the total rebuild list of 545 can be found at
> > http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f18-needsbuilt.html
>
> I don't unde
On 08/02/2012 11:58 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All, With branching for f18 happening on Tuesday next week we still
have quite a large number of failures and packages needing rebuilt.
the list of 415 current failures can be found at
http://ausil.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845681
It's a fairly trivial python/Django package, needed for supporting the
new version of ReviewBoard (which is currently nonfunctional in F17/F18
because the previous version is incompatible with Django 1.4).
I'll happily review a similarly simple p
On Fri, 03.08.12 21:10, Panu Matilainen (pmati...@laiskiainen.org) wrote:
> On 08/03/2012 08:26 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >On Fri, 03.08.12 14:44, Panu Matilainen (pmati...@laiskiainen.org) wrote:
> >
> >>On 08/03/2012 02:02 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Peter
On Fri, 03 Aug 2012 14:21:05 -0400
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jesse Keating writes:
> > On 08/02/2012 06:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I just did
> >>
> >> /usr/bin/mock -r
> >> fedora-rawhide-x86_64 /tmp/freeimage-3.10.0-10.fc18.src.rpm
>
> > Check and see what repo url is in that config file, and see w
Jesse Keating writes:
> On 08/02/2012 06:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I just did
>>
>> /usr/bin/mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 /tmp/freeimage-3.10.0-10.fc18.src.rpm
> Check and see what repo url is in that config file, and see what it
> resolves to when in use?
I did another rm -rf /var/cache/mock
On 08/03/2012 08:26 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 03.08.12 14:44, Panu Matilainen (pmati...@laiskiainen.org) wrote:
On 08/03/2012 02:02 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
2012/8/3 Lennart Poettering :
On Wed, 01.08.12 15:28, Tom Callaway (t
The kernel team is hosting a Virtual Fedora Activity Day to get the ball
rolling faster on the kernel regression test suite and we need your
help! We are looking to get new tests written, possible framework
improvements, and generally make the test suite more robust.
When: Tuesday August 14th
Whe
On Fri, 03.08.12 12:17, Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
> In the interests of balance, there are costs to changing things:
>
> - Documentation becomes obsolete and has to be rewritten.
The old path would still be looked at. And "rewritten" is too strong a
word anyway...
All I sug
On Fri, 03.08.12 14:44, Panu Matilainen (pmati...@laiskiainen.org) wrote:
> On 08/03/2012 02:02 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> >>2012/8/3 Lennart Poettering :
> >>>On Wed, 01.08.12 15:28, Tom Callaway (tcall...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >>>
> A n
Greetings! (...or perhaps I should say bonjour!)
I'd like to share a few reminders and announcements regarding the
upcoming FUDCon in Paris, France, on October 13-15, 2012.
If you are planning to attend FUDCon and need a travel subsidy to do so,
the ticketing system is now open for those
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 04:42:02AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I'd like to start a discussion about the release where we should
> > > switch to Python 3. As I have learned recently, Ubun
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 00:58 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> while the total rebuild list of 545 can be found at
> http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f18-needsbuilt.html
I don't understand why insight is still in this list: I fixed the mass
rebuild failure and already produced a successful build: Koji s
Hi,
On 07/31/2012 07:11 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently
orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16.
The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
you have a need for one of these
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 04:53 -0400, Andrew Parker wrote:
[...snip...]
> I don't think there are RPM bindings for python3 yet, although it
> looks like it is getting
> closer: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531543
The bindings are done; they're just waiting on review of that change to
t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All, With branching for f18 happening on Tuesday next week we still
have quite a large number of failures and packages needing rebuilt.
the list of 415 current failures can be found at
http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f18-failures.html
while the to
The license for perl-Crypt-Rijndael in rawhide has changed from
LGPLv2+ to LGPLv3.
--
Iain.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 08/03/2012 02:02 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
2012/8/3 Lennart Poettering :
On Wed, 01.08.12 15:28, Tom Callaway (tcall...@redhat.com) wrote:
A new section on Macros has been added to the Packaging Guidelines,
covering Packaging of Addition
In the interests of balance, there are costs to changing things:
- Documentation becomes obsolete and has to be rewritten.
- People have to be retrained.
- People have to relearn tasks that they know how to do now.
- Fedora becomes incompatible with other Linux and Unix (BSD etc) distros.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> 2012/8/3 Lennart Poettering :
>> On Wed, 01.08.12 15:28, Tom Callaway (tcall...@redhat.com) wrote:
>>
>>> A new section on Macros has been added to the Packaging Guidelines,
>>> covering Packaging of Additional RPM Macros.
>>>
>>> https://fe
Hello All.
2012/8/3 Lennart Poettering :
> On Wed, 01.08.12 15:28, Tom Callaway (tcall...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> A new section on Macros has been added to the Packaging Guidelines,
>> covering Packaging of Additional RPM Macros.
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_
On Wed, 01.08.12 15:28, Tom Callaway (tcall...@redhat.com) wrote:
> A new section on Macros has been added to the Packaging Guidelines,
> covering Packaging of Additional RPM Macros.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_of_Additional_RPM_Macros
What's the rationale b
Hi,
On 08/03/2012 11:27 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2012/7/31 Bill Nottingham :
Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently
orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16.
The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
you
2012/7/31 Bill Nottingham :
> Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently
> orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16.
>
> The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
> you have a need for one of these packages, please
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 07:39:20PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 04:12:52PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > It really depends on those file paths, and if the files move, it
> > breaks. Previously discussed below, and the status is still now
> > essentially the sam
25 matches
Mail list logo
