On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Chuck Anderson wrote:
I just wanted to confirm that for the first time ever, I could connect
to the IETF-v6 only network out of the box. Great job! I have complained
about this a lot in the last two years, so I figure I will also praise
the fix :)
Paul
ps. I'd mention the b
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/28/2012 09:33 PM, devzero2000 wrote:
>
>> why don't use lauchpad instead ? Because it use bazar as dvcs ?
>> Really ? But no.
>
> Launchpad is not a build system.
Well, no, not now, but once it becomes self-aware, who knows?
-J
>
On 07/28/2012 09:33 PM, devzero2000 wrote:
> why don't use lauchpad instead ? Because it use bazar as dvcs ?
> Really ? But no.
Launchpad is not a build system.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> He seems to be talking about a web interface that lets you edit specs
> and submit builds - some kind of basic text editor webapp hooked up to
> the spec repository, I guess.
I don't know if we need a webapp. But some prespun up virtual i
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 17:50 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Damian Ivanov
> wrote:
> > First Thanks for the link and the answer.
> > The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now:
> > http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/
> >
> > Second t
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 19:23 +0300, Damian Ivanov wrote:
> First Thanks for the link and the answer.
> The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now:
> http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/
>
> Second the problem with koji is that I have no web interface. I am
> one of th
Sorry for the top posting.
Just my 1 cent , i follow only fedora.
But the answer could be only: political in first place. But this is
the same for every distro, and this is true, in particular, for every
distro rpm based for some reason. Every major rpm distro have its
buildsystem, its bugtracker
> Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
findbugs failed to build
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=333451), but
I've now fixed and rebuilt it
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=344787).
eclipse-findbugs rebuilt OK without any changes
(
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:32:09PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to confirm that for the first time ever, I could connect
> to the IETF-v6 only network out of the box. Great job! I have complained
> about this a lot in the last two years, so I figure I will also praise
> th
Coq has now been rebuilt .. although I suspect that's largely by luck.
In any case you can go ahead and rebuild any dependencies that you
wanted to.
Thanks,
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny prog
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Damian Ivanov wrote:
> First Thanks for the link and the answer.
> The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now:
> http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/
>
> Second the problem with koji is that I have no web interface. I am
It does have
Le samedi 28 juillet 2012 à 19:23 +0300, Damian Ivanov a écrit :
> First Thanks for the link and the answer.
> The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now:
> http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/
Yes, but that doesn't mean this is sustainable. from my experience, the
i
On 07/28/2012 09:53 PM, Damian Ivanov wrote:
> First Thanks for the link and the answer.
> The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now:
> http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/
>
> Second the problem with koji is that I have no web interface. I am
> one of the maintaine
Hi,
I just wanted to confirm that for the first time ever, I could connect
to the IETF-v6 only network out of the box. Great job! I have complained
about this a lot in the last two years, so I figure I will also praise
the fix :)
Paul
ps. I'd mention the bugzilla item, but bugzilla.redhat.com i
First Thanks for the link and the answer.
The guy ported it ten days later and it seems to work perfect now:
http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2012/04/cbs-ready/
Second the problem with koji is that I have no web interface. I am
one of the maintainers of the experimental unity for Fedora and I do a few ot
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Damian Ivanov wrote:
> What would stop Fedora from doing this switch?
First, I'll completely ignore the question of what's wrong with what
we have now.
Second, speaking as one who tried to port OBS to a RHEL platform once
[1]: because of version dependency hell,
Hello all,
Any chance Fedora moves from Koji to OBS?
Why should they?
OBS has a web interface so one can easily fix packages even from an
internet cafe/work/windows pc.
Projects can be developed separately and packages can be easily
branched and submitted.
openSUSE is entirely build by OBS.
Third
Hi all,
On 07/26/2012 12:24 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Removing: quesoglc
chromium-bsu requires quesoglc-devel = 0.7.2-2.fc15
chromium-bsu requires libGLC.so.0
rss-glx requires quesoglc-devel = 0.7.2-2.fc15
rss-glx requires libGLC.so.0
warzone2100 requires quesoglc-deve
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 12:36:26 +
Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
[...]
> ---
> * Fri Jul 27 2012 - Andreas Schneider -
> 2:4.0.0-132.beta4
> - Don't define an Epoch in RHEL releases.
May I ask why?
This makes it harder to compare versions between Fedora and RHEL. I
know
19 matches
Mail list logo
