On 06/11/2012 05:55 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Excuse me, but "people like him" used to be our (Fedora's) target audience.
Have a read at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User_base
For voluntary Linux consumers who are computer-friendly and likely
coll
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:18:07 -0400
> Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>
> Such instructions for BIOS would say "Turn the computer on and start
> hitting the F2 key. If this doesn't work, try the Del key, or maybe
> some other key that may or may not be mentioned briefly in a flashing
> message right af
A while back, FESCo approved and I implemented some changes to the
process of becoming a sponsor in the packager group, and I wanted to
make sure that everyone is aware since the path to becoming a sponsor is
shorter and simpler than ever before.
The most important change is that sponsor status no
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-06-11)
===
Meeting started by limburgher at 17:01:31 UTC. The full logs are
available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-06-11/fesco.2012-06-11-17.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On 06/11/2012 09:56 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
On 06/11/2012 04:11 PM, Scott Schmit wrote:
Right now, we're missing the "clear instructions" part.
Of course we are missing that part *now*, there is no motherboard with
UEFI and Secure Boot in the wild so we can take screenshots and publish
them.
Julio Merino wrote:
> Changing the end date of the expired override will re-enable it.
That works, thanks!
David
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, drago01 wrote:
>
>> "The Fedora Project consistently seeks to create, improve, and
>> *spread* free/libre code and content. " ... you can't do that by
>> excluding users for such dubious reasons ...
>
>
> You can't do it e
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, drago01 wrote:
"The Fedora Project consistently seeks to create, improve, and
*spread* free/libre code and content. " ... you can't do that by
excluding users for such dubious reasons ...
You can't do it either by excluding *everyone*
Paul
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 09:19 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Andreas, what do you think?
>
> If you are not fond of this complete solution, can you implement at
> least the wine-tahoma-fonts vs wine-tahoma-fonts-system separation, as
> you proposed?
I will apply my proposed change for wine-tahoma wit
Summary of changes:
4253cb9... Update to latest upstream release. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fe
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:20 AM, David Howells wrote:
>
> I need to update my cross-gcc package, but that depends on my cross-binutils
> package which is still in updates-testing (should the build process fail, even
> though it is pushed to updates-testing?).
>
> To do this I need to add a build
commit 6a19d230dbea4bccb0a6d73295244563f6f82e76
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Mon Jun 11 17:25:35 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate.spec
b/perl-S
I need to update my cross-gcc package, but that depends on my cross-binutils
package which is still in updates-testing (should the build process fail, even
though it is pushed to updates-testing?).
To do this I need to add a build override with bodhi for the cross-binutils
package - however, this
commit 17953172b92ea78092548ce52a274e396193f7c4
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Mon Jun 11 17:02:01 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-NetPacket.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-NetPacket.spec b/perl-NetPacket.spec
index 52a44b8..acc76a8 10
commit 98813dc3308c4f588ea45f0dc9a98468459a2aa0
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Mon Jun 11 16:59:47 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-String-ShellQuote.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-String-ShellQuote.spec b/perl-String-ShellQuote.spec
i
commit 9336160e1c0642fd43fcc80005d741c433b205a7
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Mon Jun 11 16:59:34 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Module-Versions-Report.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Module-Versions-Report.spec b/perl-Module-Version
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> On 06/09/2012 04:25 PM, drago01 wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Chris Smart wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/06/12 19:34, drago01 wrote:
>
> Is that actually true though?
>>
>>
>> If Fedora does not implement some form of S
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
>> Of course we are missing that part *now*, there is no motherboard with UEFI
>> and Secure Boot in the wild so we can take screenshots and publish them.
>> Once such board will be rel
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> Of course we are missing that part *now*, there is no motherboard with UEFI
> and Secure Boot in the wild so we can take screenshots and publish them.
> Once such board will be released, plenty of instructions and tutorials will
> follow, to m
On 06/11/2012 04:11 PM, Scott Schmit wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 02:45:21PM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
For voluntary Linux consumers who are computer-friendly and likely
collaborators to the project, a mere BIOS change *is* trivial. If
they are not able to do even that, which level of contri
> Andreas Bierfert wrote:
> > We could of course aim for a dual-solution: Let
> > wine-tahoma-fonts put the fonts in the wine font dir (mandatory for
> > wine) and add a wine-tahoma-fonts-system package (names suggestions
> > welcome) which also puts the fonts in the system wide font path
> > (opti
commit 6dd30916bc11c45986baa96dc5453c0839896c50
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Mon Jun 11 15:12:19 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Authen-PAM.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Authen-PAM.spec b/perl-Authen-PAM.spec
index 5ee5dd5..bb37838
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 02:45:21PM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> On 06/09/2012 04:25 PM, drago01 wrote:
> >On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Chris Smart wrote:
> >>On 09/06/12 19:34, drago01 wrote:
> Is that actually true though?
> >
> >If Fedora does not implement some form of Secure Boot
Hi Adam,
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 22:39:38 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 16:11 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
> > I used preupgrade for the first time and had a similar experience,
> > but nothing one cannot fix...
> >
> > 1. Prepared the preupgrade process (f16->f17)
> > 2. reb
On 06/09/2012 04:25 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Chris Smart wrote:
On 09/06/12 19:34, drago01 wrote:
Is that actually true though?
If Fedora does not implement some form of Secure Boot support, 100% of
Fedora users will still be able to install Fedora on new machines, a
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 10:10 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 05/25/2012 09:26 AM, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 13:20 -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 09:28:16AM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> >>> I'm at a loss to how to proceed with the MiniDebugInf
On 06/08/2012 06:37 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 18:14 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 06/08/2012 05:42 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>> And - though it pains me that this next thought might actually be
>>> unpopular, though closer investigation might reveal that I'm giving the
>>> f
In case anyone is interested, here's a hacky script I wrote
to do the mass rebuild:
http://git.annexia.org/?p=mass-rebuild.git;a=summary
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerfu
28 matches
Mail list logo
