On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 29.05.2012 22:45, schrieb Roberto Ragusa:
> i think i have to mention taht VT-d is active in the BIOS and
> i was wondering that it was stable because the combination of the
> i915 options with VT-d (hardware supported virtualization IO) i
On Ter, 2012-05-29 at 16:42 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> On reboot, I found a huge mess. Duplicate packages (f16/f17) all
> over.
you have from yum-utils
package-cleanup --dupes
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/14/html/Software_Management_Guide/ch07s03.html
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
dev
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:57:52AM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 29/05/12 08:24, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > Hi Adrian,
>
> > Drop this in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/99-wheel-emulation.conf and it will be
> > persistent. I don't think we need a separate rpm for this.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Peter
> +1
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 09:21:35AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 29.5.2012 08:57, Matthias Runge napsal(a):
> >On 29/05/12 08:24, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> >>Hi Adrian,
> >>Drop this in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/99-wheel-emulation.conf and it will be
> >>persistent. I don't think we need a separate rpm
Neal Becker wrote:
I did try distro-sync, but it looked like there would be a lot of
issues, so I abandoned that idea.
I'd expect that if distro-sync has a lot of issues, preupgrade and
Anaconda are likely to as well. None of these do any magic.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproj
On 05/29/2012 07:49 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Bodhi does.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
F17 security updates: 122
F16 security updates: 310
F15 security updates: 444
Luke probably has previous releases historical data somewhere.
That means ca 2 hours per day spent in testing for all G
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 09:57:46PM +0200, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
> On 29/05/12 18:46, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> > Has anyone written any tools for converting git repos into patches?
> > Currently I use 'git format-patch' and then I copy the patches.
> >
> > Should we have a naming conv
Am 29.05.2012 22:45, schrieb Roberto Ragusa:
> On 05/27/2012 07:54 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> i notice growing problems on F16 with "Intel Sandy Bridge" graphics
>>
>> * desktop effects in KDE partly not working (3D cube as example)
>> this worked well over months after upgrade from F
2012/5/28 Juan Orti Alcaine :
> 2012/5/28 Milan Broz
>>
>> On 05/28/2012 04:55 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>> > On 05/26/2012 03:53 PM, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
>> >
>> >> I suspect it isn't working because "cryptsetup status
>> >> /dev/mapper/luks-uuid" does not say anything about discards. I think
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> You know what was the painless part of this re-install? After firing up
> google
> chrome, I didn't need to reinstall anything for it. It's all synced with
> gmail.
>
> I find myself wishing that all my fedora packages could be restored ju
On Tue, 29 May 2012 17:04:52 -0400
Neal Becker wrote:
> You know what was the painless part of this re-install? After firing
> up google chrome, I didn't need to reinstall anything for it. It's
> all synced with gmail.
>
> I find myself wishing that all my fedora packages could be restored
> j
On 05/29/2012 04:42 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Basically the same kind of failure as the last several times I did updates.
This time f16->f17. Used preupgrade.
It seems to have all gone wrong when cpio failed, because a python package had
been installed using pip into the (default) system dirs. Th
You know what was the painless part of this re-install? After firing up google
chrome, I didn't need to reinstall anything for it. It's all synced with gmail.
I find myself wishing that all my fedora packages could be restored just like
that.
Oh sure, there's a few methods for automaticing in
Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 05/29/2012 04:46 PM, Corey Richardson wrote:
>> I've heard nothing but bad things about preupgrade from lots of people,
>> and I've heard the developers either never hear about it, ignore it, or
>> don't care. I tried a preupgrade and it half-succeeded, I had to fix
>> the
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2012 16:42:30 -0400
> Neal Becker wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
>>
>> 1) Could I have actually recovered from this mess without a complete
>> re-install?
>
> Sure. Confirm the correct repos were enabled, 'yum distro-sync' and
> work through any dep issues that sh
- Original Message -
> From: "Przemek Klosowski"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 4:58:35 PM
> Subject: Re: another upgrade, another disaster
>
> On 05/29/2012 04:50 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> >> 1) Could I have actually recovered from t
On 05/29/2012 04:50 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
1) Could I have actually recovered from this mess without a complete
re-install?
Sure. Confirm the correct repos were enabled, 'yum distro-sync' and
work through any dep issues that show up.
I think they changed it to 'yum distribution-sychronizatio
- Original Message -
> From: "Neal Becker"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 4:42:30 PM
> Subject: another upgrade, another disaster
>
> [SNIP]
> On reboot, I found a huge mess. Duplicate packages (f16/f17) all
> over.
I did the upgrade using yum and ende
On Tue, 29 May 2012 16:42:30 -0400
Neal Becker wrote:
...snip...
>
> 1) Could I have actually recovered from this mess without a complete
> re-install?
Sure. Confirm the correct repos were enabled, 'yum distro-sync' and
work through any dep issues that show up.
> 2) Can't we make the install
On 05/29/2012 04:46 PM, Corey Richardson wrote:
> I've heard nothing but bad things about preupgrade from lots of people,
> and I've heard the developers either never hear about it, ignore it, or
> don't care. I tried a preupgrade and it half-succeeded, I had to fix
> the initramfs and a few other
On Tue, 29 May 2012 16:42:30 -0400
Neal Becker wrote:
> Basically the same kind of failure as the last several times I did
> updates. This time f16->f17. Used preupgrade.
>
I've heard nothing but bad things about preupgrade from lots of people,
and I've heard the developers either never hear
On 05/27/2012 07:54 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Hi
>
> i notice growing problems on F16 with "Intel Sandy Bridge" graphics
>
> * desktop effects in KDE partly not working (3D cube as example)
> this worked well over months after upgrade from F14 to F15 and
>
> * sometimes the whole desktop hang
Basically the same kind of failure as the last several times I did updates.
This time f16->f17. Used preupgrade.
It seems to have all gone wrong when cpio failed, because a python package had
been installed using pip into the (default) system dirs. The conflict IIRC
happens because pip insta
Hi,
I have a suggestion, not totally related.
It would be nice to have a tool which does the same thing than portaudit
for FreeBSD.
This tool is simple: you launch it, and it lists which packages are
vulnerable.
That's way you don't need to wait for a package to be in -testing or in
-stable to kno
On 29/05/12 18:46, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Has anyone written any tools for converting git repos into patches?
> Currently I use 'git format-patch' and then I copy the patches.
>
> Should we have a naming convention for patches? I proposed to use
> the 000*-*.patch files directly from git fo
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 05:46:52PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> But where to keep it? fedorahosted is a possibility, but:
> (a) Is anyone else doing the same thing on fedorahosted?
> (b) Should we have a standard project name for such packages
> (eg. 'fedora-ocaml')?
I filed a request f
On Tue, 29 May 2012 19:42:21 +
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 05/29/2012 07:27 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > It wouldn't have to be I wouldn't think... they could also test for
> > general functionality or serious regressions.
>
> Does infrastructure keep somewhere statistic how many secur
On Thu, 24.05.12 09:28, Alexander Larsson (al...@redhat.com) wrote:
> I'm at a loss to how to proceed with the MiniDebugInfo work. I have
> patches to rpmbuild that creates the compressed minidebuginfo putting
> them in the main binaries, and I have patches to gdb that reads the
> compressed debug
On 05/29/2012 07:27 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
It wouldn't have to be I wouldn't think... they could also test for
general functionality or serious regressions.
Does infrastructure keep somewhere statistic how many security updates
we push per release cycles so we can roughly calculate how much ma
On Tue, 29 May 2012 19:15:21 +
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 05/29/2012 06:39 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Perhaps if there's enough interest we could (re)vive a Security SIG
> > of some kind? One of their goals could be to cross test updates and
> > provide karma?
>
> Would not their pa
On 05/29/2012 06:39 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Perhaps if there's enough interest we could (re)vive a Security SIG of
some kind? One of their goals could be to cross test updates and
provide karma?
Would not their participation be more geared to test if the exploit has
actually been closed rather
On 05/29/2012 06:13 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> It makes no sense to have a gui application ( or an application for that
> matter ) without having written the relevant how to debug/how to test
> pages for each component to accommodate it.
Indeed. However, I'd argue*both* pieces, a karma app and
On Mon, 28 May 2012 12:57:18 -0400 (EDT)
Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've recently had release updates to two packages with CVE issues in
> then. A few weeks ago, pidgin-otr needed a lot of me prodding people
> to try it and give karma to get the security update out. Right now, my
> socat C
On Tue, 29 May 2012 13:13:43 -0500
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>
> > On 05/29/2012 05:21 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> We actually have this on the QA wishlist and it was one of the
> >> projects we proposed for GSoC for QA, but it didn't quite make it.
> >> We may still w
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Adrian Alves wrote:
> We can trade reviews I can review ur package and u can review mines
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Ben Rosser wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I'm still looking for someone to review my first package, PDFMiner:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.co
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> On 05/29/2012 05:21 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> We actually have this on the QA wishlist and it was one of the projects
>> we proposed for GSoC for QA, but it didn't quite make it. We may still
>> wind up doing it through some other channel, though. See also
>>
ht
Am 29.05.2012 16:45, schrieb Adam Jackson:
> On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 19:54 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> may it be that this is caused by major kernel updates
>> without update the graphics stack?
>>
>> 3.3.7-1.fc16.x86_64 2012-05-22 16:59:51
>> xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.17.0-8.fc16 2
2012/5/29 Richard W.M. Jones :
> Has anyone written any tools for converting git repos into patches?
> Currently I use 'git format-patch' and then I copy the patches.
Have a look at topgit [1], also packaged for Fedora.
- Thomas
[1] http://repo.or.cz/w/topgit.git?a=blob;f=README
--
devel maili
Since the ocaml compiler now has a bunch of patches, and it's rather
hard to maintain and develop them, I'd like to keep unpacked sources
somewhere. [1]
The idea is that maintainers, proven packagers etc should be able to
co-maintain those patches using the (much easier) git repo, instead of
cre
28.05.2012 16:23, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 05/27/2012 10:28 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hi.
Due to the security issues ([1] for example) and act as newcomer
provenpackager I'll plan update ImageMagick in Fedora 16 too (I should
had been done it early off course). It seams addressed in rawhide.
Hi P
On 05/29/2012 03:21 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 29.5.2012 08:57, Matthias Runge napsal(a):
On 29/05/12 08:24, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Drop this in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/99-wheel-emulation.conf and it will be
persistent. I don't think we need a separate rpm for this.
Cheers,
Peter
+
Compose started at Tue May 29 08:15:04 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 19:54 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> may it be that this is caused by major kernel updates
> without update the graphics stack?
>
> 3.3.7-1.fc16.x86_64 2012-05-22 16:59:51
> xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.17.0-8.fc16 2012-01-25 21:54:48
I'd be mildly surprised. The 2D
"At the heat of a thousand hot dog cookers, the seventeenth release of
Fedora shall be forged by contributors the world over, and it will be
known as: Beefy Miracle. The mustard shall indicate progress.
For six months, participants in the Fedora Project shall freely
contribute to the release o
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:23:33PM -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
> Hi Gang:
>
> I no longer have the kernel panic at shut-down, and it's great! Thanks!
> However, Now the xqx driver for my HP P1005 won't go in correctly and so
> the printer doesn't work right now. In all likelihood, it is somethin
I can't help with xqx driver, but you can try hpcups driver from hplip.
You also need to install the HP proprietary plugin with 'hp-plugin'.
--
Jiri
On 05/28/2012 09:23 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
Hi Gang:
I no longer have the kernel panic at shut-down, and it's great!
Thanks! However, Now the
Dne 29.5.2012 08:57, Matthias Runge napsal(a):
On 29/05/12 08:24, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Drop this in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/99-wheel-emulation.conf and it will be
persistent. I don't think we need a separate rpm for this.
Cheers,
Peter
+1
I don't think, we need a config-only packag
47 matches
Mail list logo
