On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 21:58 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > [ shrug... ] The fact that *you* don't care is not evidence that nobody
> > else cares, and it is certainly not evidence that nobody else should care.
>
> The fact that many maintainers have been doing this for years an
I thought I should report that I was shutting down for the night and got a
kernel-panic; is there a file to look at so that I can report it?
I may not reply for the next 10 hours.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 22:22 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 22:22 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
> I'm slightly uneasy to install this boot.iso as it looks really small.
It's a network installation image. It retrieves the packages to be
installed from the online repositories. We have always provided such
images for Fedora.
--
Adam Wil
I'm slightly uneasy to install this boot.iso as it looks really small.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Andre Robatino
wrote:
> As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Final Release Candidate 3
> (RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including
> changes, can be found at ht
On 21 May 2012 23:08, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Lun 21 mai 2012 08:23, pravin@gmail.com a écrit :
>
> > - Use base of croscore fonts and apply enhancements available in
> > liberation and call new entity liberation 2.0
>
> That would be great !
>
> (but please don't add the 2.0 to the
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 17:51 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
> > no problem.
> >
> >
> > I may know better next time an RC comes out than to bring these up, it
> > is probably better that I wait until the next RC: I am having issues
> > with t
On 05/21/2012 08:17 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2012 18:47:05 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
i.e. there was no empty line so git chucked them all into subject when
generating mails. Now they do:
"line one
- line two
- line three"
There is primarily missing the first line:
* M
On Mon, 21 May 2012 18:47:05 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> i.e. there was no empty line so git chucked them all into subject when
> generating mails. Now they do:
> "line one
>
> - line two
> - line three"
There is primarily missing the first line:
* Mon May 14 2012 Jan Kratochvil -
7.4.
My apologies; the links on that were wrong. Big copy/paste error on my
part; not a good start!
The main package, rubygem-chef is at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823352, and the other
packages are linked off of there.
A little bit about myself: I'm a network administrator who has b
Nice to meet u if u want u can start doing reviews on any of my builts:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Alvesadrian
Regards, Adrian.-
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Ben Rosser wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've been sitting silently in this mailing list for the past few weeks,
> but just thi
On 21/05/2012, at 5:12 PM, Zdenek Pavlas wrote:
>
> Three connections limit is used when the above is not available
> (e.g. a baseurl setup with just one mirror). I don't mind lowering
> it to just two, as that should work good enough in most cases.
Yes please. Two is better than three from the
Hello all,
I've been sitting silently in this mailing list for the past few weeks, but
just this afternoon submitted my first package review request for pdfminer,
a Python library for extracting plaintext, HTML, and images from a pdf
file: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823679
I lear
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 17:51 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
> no problem.
>
>
> I may know better next time an RC comes out than to bring these up, it
> is probably better that I wait until the next RC: I am having issues
> with the curser / mouse on this computer
You'd need to be much more specif
no problem.
I may know better next time an RC comes out than to bring these up, it is
probably better that I wait until the next RC: I am having issues with the
curser / mouse on this computer and I think I might prevented from viewing
the shows at http://www.thecomedynetwork.ca/ in Canada. If I h
On Seg, 2012-05-21 at 14:49 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I just begin with better documentation, git "guide lines" are in the
> end
> of something that doesn't look git docs.
>
I mean, *better* documentation please .
$ git checkout master (or fedpkg switch-branch)
... do a fix, test, commit, bui
On 05/21/2012 01:51 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> re-writing history in a shared git repo is quite rude to all the people
> who have it cloned. Not something I'm going to support.
Nothing that can't be easily solved by a git pull --rebase most of the
time.
It's still not a path I would want to go
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Final Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5196 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testing inst
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 09:48 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 05/21/2012 06:08 AM, Thomas Moschny wrote:
> > 2012/5/21 Simo Sorce:
> >> Except we do not allow to rewrite history and push -f so you will never
> >> be able to squash everything.
> >
> > If koji/bodhi were able to tag successful builds
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> I usually write them once:
> *.spec
> fedpkg clog
> fedpkg commit -F clog -p
I also write the logs in the specfile first, but then I middle-click-paste
them into git-cola's commit message textbox.
Am I the only one using git-cola for Fedora dist-git? IMHO, it's much more
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 12:09 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
> it works!
OK, then I'm guessing you indeed installed RC1 (or an RC1-era package
set from remote repos) and got hit by that PackageKit bug. It should be
fixed in RC2 and RC3 and hence the final release, so nothing to worry
about there. Tha
Greg Swift wrote:
> i'm not against cleaning up ifs related to end of life/support
> releases, but how far are you suggesting that go?
All support for Fedora n should be dropped at Fedora n's end of life.
> I know that I've pulled plenty of rawhide packages for build on a RHEL box
> when necessar
Tom Lane wrote:
> [ shrug... ] The fact that *you* don't care is not evidence that nobody
> else cares, and it is certainly not evidence that nobody else should care.
The fact that many maintainers have been doing this for years and nobody
complained about it is, though.
It just doesn't make se
it works!
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Richard Vickery <
richard.vicker...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No problem :-)
>
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 20:21 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>> > * Richard Vickery [21/05/2012 20:20] :
>> > >
>> >
No problem :-)
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 20:21 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > * Richard Vickery [21/05/2012 20:20] :
> > >
> > > Do you think I could be provided a link to PK, since, to be hionest, I
> > > don't know what PK stands for - t
commit 383b0465066dc408c5946e0da0d621e5d7efec9e
Author: Daniel P. Berrange
Date: Mon May 21 19:34:06 2012 +0100
Update to 0.9.12 release
perl-Sys-Virt.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Sys-Virt.spec b/
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sys-Virt:
ca6ae250091c9b17354ac3753bb740a2 Sys-Virt-0.9.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-05-21)
===
Meeting started by t8m at 17:00:37 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-05-21/fesco.2012-05-21-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 20:21 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Richard Vickery [21/05/2012 20:20] :
> >
> > Do you think I could be provided a link to PK, since, to be hionest, I
> > don't know what PK stands for - though I will try to find out in the
> > duration until your reply?
>
> PK == Packag
* Richard Vickery [21/05/2012 20:20] :
>
> Do you think I could be provided a link to PK, since, to be hionest, I
> don't know what PK stands for - though I will try to find out in the
> duration until your reply?
PK == PackageKit
Emmanuel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
Do you think I could be provided a link to PK, since, to be hionest, I
don't know what PK stands for - though I will try to find out in the
duration until your reply?
Thanks so much,
Richard
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 09:08 -0700, Richard Vic
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 12:21 +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 05/21/12 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> >> - Original Message -
> >>> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
> And definitvely, for me, (and probably on
On 05/21/2012 08:34 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
I give you that, but do you see any alternative which would in let's say
five years replaced git in Fedora? Five years is a long time in computer
industry, but OTOH five years ago (plus how long it has been since we
actually switched to git) it was IMHO
Le Lun 21 mai 2012 08:23, pravin@gmail.com a écrit :
> - Use base of croscore fonts and apply enhancements available in
> liberation and call new entity liberation 2.0
That would be great !
(but please don't add the 2.0 to the name)
--
Nicolas Mailhot
--
devel mailing list
devel@lis
On 05/21/2012 06:08 AM, Thomas Moschny wrote:
2012/5/21 Simo Sorce:
Except we do not allow to rewrite history and push -f so you will never
be able to squash everything.
If koji/bodhi were able to tag successful builds within git, we would
be able to allow rewrites, squash commits and the like
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 09:08 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
> I'm not sure; how do I test for this? If I have RC1, how do I get RC2?
> I can, however, yum the software I need/want, and have since done so.
Try using PK again. If it works now, you were probably hitting that bug.
With that bug, once yu
Quoting Ralf Corsepius (2012-05-21 17:13:56)
> On 05/21/2012 12:09 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > On 21.5.2012 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> -1 changelogs are manually written documents and source files.
> >
> > And your commit messages are written by aliens?
> My change logs are inside of the rpm.s
Le lundi 21 mai 2012 à 09:01 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 08:33 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 09:49:03PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:02:23PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > > > Agreed. changelog and version
I'm not sure; how do I test for this? If I have RC1, how do I get RC2? I
can, however, yum the software I need/want, and have since done so.
On May 21, 2012 8:27 AM, "Adam Williamson" wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 10:44 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
> > After having this installed, is it adequat
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 08:33 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 09:49:03PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:02:23PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > > Agreed. changelog and version field conflicts are 90% of my cherry-pick
> > > conflicts.
> > > I wou
On 21.5.2012 17:13, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
... nobody mentioned Bodhi update messages here).
I did not want to reheat previous discussions on Fedora bureaucracy, but
this is part of it.
I wouldn't dare say a word about our update policy (Growing up in the
Communist Czechoslovakia taught me whe
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 12:07 -0400, Zdenek Pavlas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A new yum and urlgrabber packages have just hit Rawhide. These releases
> include some new features, including parallel downloading of packages and
> metadata, and a new mirror selection code. As we plan to include these
> feature
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 10:44 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
> After having this installed, is it adequate, or acceptable, to ask
> what kind of information you want? Is it adequate to offer that I am
> prevented from installing software in the add/remove software
> (market)? Those that I attempted th
On 05/21/2012 12:09 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 21.5.2012 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
-1 changelogs are manually written documents and source files.
And your commit messages are written by aliens?
My change logs are inside of the rpm.spec.
You are lucky! I have to
write them myself (and I re
Greg Swift venit, vidit, dixit 21.05.2012 15:29:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Michael J Gruber
> wrote:
>> * put compatibility cludges for older releases on their respective
>> branches (this gets rid of many if's in spec)
>
> i'm not against cleaning up ifs related to end of life/support
>
Stanislav Ochotnicky venit, vidit, dixit 21.05.2012 14:49:
> Quoting Michael J Gruber (2012-05-21 11:52:40)
>> Sérgio Basto venit, vidit, dixit 18.05.2012 22:25:
>>> On Sex, 2012-05-18 at 18:35 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
I've been seeing this ugliness more and more to the point where
Already tried but I need those Lzma2* ones.
I suppose the correct way would be for p7zip to generate shared
libraries and for the project I need to package to link to it. Too
much work for an internal tool for now.
Thanks,
--Simone
On 21 May 2012 16:05, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012
Karel Zak venit, vidit, dixit 21.05.2012 12:43:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:52:40AM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>> Just like we have mandatory packaging guidelines, we should have
>> mandatory git guidelines simply because it is part of the build system,
>
> yep, and also mailing list guideli
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 06:27:38AM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:23 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > >> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, R
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2012 14:35:57 +0200, SC (Simone) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I need the p7zip header files for a package I would like to submit for
>> review; but p7zip does not include them as it does not provide a
>> p7zip-devel subpackage.
On Seg, 2012-05-21 at 12:43 +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:52:40AM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > Just like we have mandatory packaging guidelines, we should have
> > mandatory git guidelines simply because it is part of the build system,
>
> yep, and also mailing list
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Michael J Gruber
wrote:
> * put compatibility cludges for older releases on their respective
> branches (this gets rid of many if's in spec)
i'm not against cleaning up ifs related to end of life/support
releases, but how far are you suggesting that go? I know th
2012/5/21 Simo Sorce :
> Except we do not allow to rewrite history and push -f so you will never
> be able to squash everything.
If koji/bodhi were able to tag successful builds within git, we would
be able to allow rewrites, squash commits and the like at least for
commits that never have been su
Compose started at Mon May 21 08:15:02 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-admin]
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48
389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.
perl-Net-OpenSSH has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Net-OpenSSH-0.57-3.fc18.noarch requires
openssh-clients(%{__isa_name}-%{__isa_bits})
On i386:
perl-Net-OpenSSH-0.57-3.fc18.noarch requires
openssh-clients(%{__isa_name}-%{__isa_bits})
Please resolve th
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 14:21 +0200, Emanuel Rietveld wrote:
> On 05/21/2012 01:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > Technically, the major difference is git recording each and every
> > detail, which an rpm's user hardly is interested in. The latter audience
> > is not interested in seeing these details
Dne 21.5.2012 12:09, Matej Cepl napsal(a):
On 21.5.2012 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
-1 changelogs are manually written documents and source files.
And your commit messages are written by aliens? You are lucky! I have
to write them myself (and I really hate that I have to write the same
info
On Mon, 21 May 2012 14:35:57 +0200, SC (Simone) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need the p7zip header files for a package I would like to submit for
> review; but p7zip does not include them as it does not provide a
> p7zip-devel subpackage.
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=271
Quoting Michael J Gruber (2012-05-21 11:52:40)
> Sérgio Basto venit, vidit, dixit 18.05.2012 22:25:
> > On Sex, 2012-05-18 at 18:35 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> >> I've been seeing this ugliness more and more to the point where I just
> >> can't keep writing individual emails. Repeat after
On 05/21/2012 02:19 PM, Stijn Hoop wrote:
The reasons you mention are just FUD -- this can happen to whatever
data you specify
No ... I have seen all such cases happen.
People killing git histories in various ways, ... not worth mentioning,
I'd yet have to see one single VCS conversion which d
Hello,
I need the p7zip header files for a package I would like to submit for
review; but p7zip does not include them as it does not provide a
p7zip-devel subpackage.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2715
I need these (taken from the debuginfo pacakge):
/usr/src/debug/p7
On 05/21/2012 01:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Technically, the major difference is git recording each and every
detail, which an rpm's user hardly is interested in. The latter audience
is not interested in seeing these details, they are interesting in
"summaries".
E.g. they are not interested in
On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:40:55 +0200
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/21/2012 12:21 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > On 05/21/12 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> >>> - Original Message -
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet w
On 05/21/2012 12:27 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:23 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
And definitvely, for m
On 05/21/2012 12:21 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 05/21/12 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is really
not
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Monday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
None as far as I know.
= New business =
#topic
Compose started at Mon May 21 08:15:04 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[LuxRender]
LuxRender-blender-0.8.0-13.fc17.x86_64 requires blender(ABI) = 0:2.61
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires rubyg
Hello.
I still have a quite large backlog of submitted packages so I'd like
to exchange reviews with someone. I've got these packages for trade:
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/739015 - erlang-riak_sysmon -
Rate-limiting system_monitor event handler for Riak
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/739016 - e
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 12:43 +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:52:40AM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > Just like we have mandatory packaging guidelines, we should have
> > mandatory git guidelines simply because it is part of the build system,
>
> yep, and also mailing list g
On Sun, 20 May 2012 19:56:30 -0700, JC (Jonas) wrote:
> Hello all:
>
> I've submitted a bunch of package submissions which need a sponsor.
Packages aren't sponsored, people are. You may want to pay attention to
the yellow box here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_main
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:52:40AM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Just like we have mandatory packaging guidelines, we should have
> mandatory git guidelines simply because it is part of the build system,
yep, and also mailing list guidelines, bugzilla guidelines and
finally fashion police...
> The number of concurrent users is now lower because, well, each of
> them now completes a "yum update" in one third of the time.
I think Glen's concerns were that the consumed resources
(flow caches, TCP hash entries, sockets) may scale faster
than the aggregated downloading speed.
I am aware o
- Original Message -
> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:23 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > - Original Message -
> > >> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
> > >>> And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for m
On 05/21/12 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>>> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is really
not a good tool for spec maintenanc
On 21.5.2012 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
-1 changelogs are manually written documents and source files.
And your commit messages are written by aliens? You are lucky! I have to
write them myself (and I really hate that I have to write the same
information thrice ... nobody mentioned Bodhi up
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:23 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
> >>> And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is really
> >>> not a good tool
Sérgio Basto venit, vidit, dixit 18.05.2012 22:25:
> On Sex, 2012-05-18 at 18:35 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>> I've been seeing this ugliness more and more to the point where I just
>> can't keep writing individual emails. Repeat after me: git is not CVS.
>>
>> When you have 2 branches wit
On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is really
not a good tool for spec maintenance.
Not duplicating the changelog would help. There's
- Original Message -
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
> > And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is really
> > not a good tool for spec maintenance.
>
> Not duplicating the changelog would help. There's little reason to
> have a changelog in
Hi Glen,
> Why is the default three connections rather than one? Is a tripling
> of the number of connections to a mirror on a Fedora release day
> desirable?
$ grep maxconnections /var/cache/yum/*/metalink.xml
/var/cache/yum/fedora/metalink.xml:
/var/cache/yum/updates/metalink.xml:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 09:49:03PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:02:23PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > Agreed. changelog and version field conflicts are 90% of my cherry-pick
> > conflicts.
> > I would be in favour of no longer maintaining a changelog in the spec file
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/21/2012 02:32 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 14:07 +0800, Gregory Hosler wrote:
>> Part way down, there are directions on
>>
>> Generate a PKCS12 user certificate
>>
>> This is for web browser. This is only required for user
81 matches
Mail list logo
