Hello Guys,
am looking for someone who can make a review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817391
Regards, Adrian Alves.-
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Alvesadrian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 2 May 2012 10:16, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 12:00 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
>
>> However, one pre-upgrade bug that may prevent you installing and is
>> not on the blockers list:
>
> The blocker list is specifically intended to be open to nominations. We
> still have the prob
Hi Folks,
Thanks for joining us today in our weekly meeting. Here are the minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-05-02/fedora-meeting.2012-05-02-19.59.html
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On May 2, 2012, at 2:03 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 05/02/2012 03:59 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> "If you are ready" is a bit redundant. How about.
>>
>> You are currently running Fedora from live media.
>> You can install Fedora now, or choose "Install to Hard
>> Drive" in the Activities overvi
On 05/02/2012 03:59 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> "If you are ready" is a bit redundant. How about.
>
> You are currently running Fedora from live media.
> You can install Fedora now, or choose "Install to Hard
> Drive" in the Activities overview at any later time.
I agree, this is the simplest and
On 05/02/2012 08:47 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 05/01/2012 07:25 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
>> I've got to be honest here -- I don't like the wording of the
>> notification. /.../
>
> Pádraig, Jared, Chris:
>
> Thanks for the suggestions
>
> How about this as the main text:
> You are currently
On 05/01/2012 07:25 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> I've got to be honest here -- I don't like the wording of the
> notification. /.../
Pádraig, Jared, Chris:
Thanks for the suggestions, I think these are definitely an improvement
over the original text. I'll reply with in line comments regarding
Chr
I forgot what the command is to get the text-readout of what happened
during boot; can someone remind me of this? Else my contribution may be
late in coming - apologies.
On 2012-05-02 2:11 AM, "Adam Williamson" wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 00:39 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> > 2012/4/28 Mic
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 16:08 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> Back in Fedora 16 we tried to advance the state of the art. We switched
> to using GPT disklabels by default, and in many cases this worked just
> fine. But it has become increasingly obvious that the hardware isn't
> ready for us. We contin
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 13:30 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the fedora 17 schedule
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/17/Schedule lists the final
> change freeze as 2012-05-07 this means that you need to make sure that
> any changes you want in Fedora 17 final must be submited for
commit e5d32ff176bdbd562fe0747ef877ec8aa294b8c9
Author: Yanko Kaneti
Date: Wed May 2 13:59:31 2012 +0300
Update to 2.92
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.g
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious:
1ab56a556b1ca9f9c1562c5d50226b53 Mojolicious-2.92.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
On Wed, 02 May 2012 08:55:22 +0200, AL (Alec) wrote:
> I sort of like the "submit a provisional spec" approach. It will qualify
> the requests, and the requester will get some basic understanding making
> future communications with an upcoming packager easier. And, of course,
> there will be us
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 14:56 +0100, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> Just a warning to all, this bug is still present.
> If the cupsd is running and you "umount" a USB disk, then the disk will not
> be properly unmounted and any written data will not have been synced.
> A pretty major bug that is still there
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 11:22 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 26.04.2012 11:18, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> >> Does that imply that new installs will be easily switched from firewalld
> >> to static iptables? I always do new install but I want to keep my firewall
> >> static, with my current iptab
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 12:00 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
> However, one pre-upgrade bug that may prevent you installing and is
> not on the blockers list:
The blocker list is specifically intended to be open to nominations. We
still have the problem that people without editbugs privileges can't
chang
# F17 Final Blocker Review meeting #3
# Date: 2012-05-03
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Note the non-usual time - Thursday instead of Friday.
We were able to get through some of the blockers at the review meeting
earlier today but t
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 00:39 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> 2012/4/28 Michał Piotrowski :
> > Hi,
> >
> > W dniu 28 kwietnia 2012 09:52 użytkownik Adam Williamson
> > napisał:
> >> On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:18 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 20:05:50 +0200,
> >>>Mi
I've updated the feature page.
--
Jiri
On 04/30/2012 10:24 PM, Kévin Raymond wrote:
Does that imply that new installs will be easily switched from firewalld
to static iptables? I always do new install but I want to keep my firewall
static, with my current iptables script.
Once we actually go
19 matches
Mail list logo
