Re: About packaging Zotero standalone for Fedora

2012-04-29 Thread nomnex
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:29:19 +0100 > Ilyes Gouta wrote: > > Since version 3.0, Zotero has also been available as a standalone > executable (previously a Firefox plugin) based on the XULRunner > runtime; and I'm thinking about packaging it for Fedora. User's feedback only. That's great news! Tha

intended behavior of mediacheck on FAIL

2012-04-29 Thread Andre Robatino
Filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817419 . -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2012-04-30)

2012-04-29 Thread Jon Ciesla
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting monday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Followups = #topic #839 Proposal for revitalizing the packager

About packaging Zotero standalone for Fedora

2012-04-29 Thread Ilyes Gouta
Hi, Zotero is a referencing tool that helps the user collecting, maintaining and generating citations from research papers and so on. Since version 3.0, Zotero has also been available as a standalone executable (previously a Firefox plugin) based on the XULRunner runtime; and I'm thinking about p

Re: How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

2012-04-29 Thread Chris Murphy
On Apr 29, 2012, at 6:20 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 01:53:19PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> New problem is that the successfully installed system (from LiveCD ISO >> burned to DVD-RW media), upon reboot, does not eject the disc, rather >> it boots from it not the H

Re: Eliminating automatic provides on private libs

2012-04-29 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 04/29/2012 06:13 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 04/27/2012 07:36 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:13:47AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: I'm going to add a switch to allow packages to control the behavior anyway. Whether rpm upstream defaults to the traditional behavior f

Re: Eliminating automatic provides on private libs

2012-04-29 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 04/27/2012 07:36 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:13:47AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: I'm going to add a switch to allow packages to control the behavior anyway. Whether rpm upstream defaults to the traditional behavior for compatibility reasons or not is another quest

Re: Proposal for revitalizing the sponsorship process for packaging

2012-04-29 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:31:43 +1000, GG (Guido) wrote: > > That's no new responsibilities. Sponsors have always been expected to do > > that. With pkgdb, it requires "watch*" access to the packages. Else > > it requires subscribing to the scm-commits list and filtering by > > username/packagename.

rawhide report: 20120429 changes

2012-04-29 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun Apr 29 08:15:03 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [389-admin] 389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48 389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48 389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.

Re: How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

2012-04-29 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 01:53:19PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > New problem is that the successfully installed system (from LiveCD ISO > burned to DVD-RW media), upon reboot, does not eject the disc, rather > it boots from it not the HDD. When I reboot with option key at the > startup chime, I'

F-17 Branched report: 20120429 changes

2012-04-29 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sun Apr 29 08:15:04 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [LuxRender] LuxRender-blender-0.8.0-13.fc17.x86_64 requires blender(ABI) = 0:2.61 [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby(

Re: F16->F17 preupgrade (Re: F17 Beta to slip by an additional week.)

2012-04-29 Thread Ian Malone
On 29 April 2012 01:05, Richard Vickery wrote: > On 2012-04-26 10:50 AM, "Michał Piotrowski" wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> W dniu 9 kwietnia 2012 17:46 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski >> napisał: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Is it possible to upgrade now from F16 to F17 with preupgrade? >> > >> > >> >> Has anyone

Re: Proposal for revitalizing the sponsorship process for packaging

2012-04-29 Thread Guido Grazioli
Il 28 aprile 2012 19:02, Michael Schwendt ha scritto: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:31:59 +1000, GG (Guido) wrote: > >> To go back to initial proposal of >> revitalizing sponsor role, I think it would also be a good thing, >> given that we leverage on new possible sponsor responsibilities >> (ie, super