Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> That's my fault I probably shouldn't have included f16 in there just
> updates
Indeed, only updates (which inherit the GA release builds) should be
compared in that script, not GA releases.
In addition, I had fixed the script to properly support updates-testing
repositor
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Paul Wouters wrote:
Confirmed the suspend fix. overheating still happening. Trying out older
kernels now to pinpoint the exact version that introduced this.
I tried the oldest kernels available and they also caused overheating,
so I assume the problem is related to an upda
On Apr 17, 2012, at 2:32 PM, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 17, 2012, 4:15:53 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Apr 17, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>>> I do not see anything in the f17 feature page describing any graphical
>>> configuration tool. But I also agree that gui configurat
Normally top reports CPU line, sy at 0.4% when idle. If I format an external
Firewire disk as btrfs and mount it, it remains at 0.4%. If I reformat as XFS
and mount it, again top reports sy at 0.4%. However, if I reformat as ext4 and
mount it, sy runs at 3.5%. These two processes are now at the
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Josh Boyer wrote:
Suspend is no longer working for me on 3.3.1-5 or 3.3.2-1 on a Lenovo
ThinkPad x220, but I haven't had any issues with overheating. Then
again, I wasn't doing kernel compiles either.
Update selinux-policy to -116. There's a bug that causes the sync
comm
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, drago01 said:
>> Well it is not like you download it daily so ...
>
> That would be an incredibly poor justification to cram two otherwise
> unrelated things (live and install)
Obviously they aren't that unrelated otherwise
Hi
one question before decisions are nailed down
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/firewalld-default
> An explicit transition is planned after Fedora 18 with dropping support for
> the
> static firewall with system-config-firewal/lokkit. A migration from the static
> firewall model will be
On Tuesday, April 17, 2012, 4:15:53 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Apr 17, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>> I do not see anything in the f17 feature page describing any graphical
>> configuration tool. But I also agree that gui configuratio is needed,
>> otherwise it will probably be really
On Apr 17, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> I do not see anything in the f17 feature page describing any graphical
> configuration tool. But I also agree that gui configuratio is needed,
> otherwise it will probably be really difficult to do things like connect via
> ssh or share via
Once upon a time, drago01 said:
> Well it is not like you download it daily so ...
That would be an incredibly poor justification to cram two otherwise
unrelated things (live and install) into one image (if that is indeed
the idea of the anaconda group - I haven't seen any clarification yet).
--
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 21:50:57 +0200,
Jochen Schmitt wrote:
I have got the following error message from the build system:
dist-f15-updates > f16 (stellarium-0.11.1-1.fc15
stellarium-0.11.0-1.fc16)
Unforunately, this makes no sense for me, because you can create a new
build for f16 and
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hallo,
>
> I have got the following error message from the build system:
>
> dist-f15-updates > f16 (stellarium-0.11.1-1.fc15
> stellarium-0.11.0-1.fc16)
>
> Unforunately, this makes n
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I've got two reviews I need completed which are dependencies for
> another package I'd like to submit.
>
> Pivy
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458975
Please open a new review request so $reporter == ${submitter of review
reques
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
I have got the following error message from the build system:
dist-f15-updates > f16 (stellarium-0.11.1-1.fc15
stellarium-0.11.0-1.fc16)
Unforunately, this makes no sense for me, because you can create a new
build for f16 and
you can't d
I do not see anything in the f17 feature page describing any graphical
configuration tool. But I also agree that gui configuratio is needed,
otherwise it will probably be really difficult to do things like connect
via ssh or share via rygel or other dlna server.
On Apr 17, 2012 6:32 PM, "Adam Willi
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, drago01 said:
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>> > I'm guessing that such a "anaconda in a locked-down environment" would
>> > have to be installing packages from the network, since there certainly
>>
On Apr 17, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> replace it with a choice on the
> live image boot menu between 'boot a live desktop' and 'install'
I like this idea. Although perhaps slightly challenging to get concisely worded
choices that also don't cause confusion. It's possible "Star
Once upon a time, drago01 said:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > I'm guessing that such a "anaconda in a locked-down environment" would
> > have to be installing packages from the network, since there certainly
> > isn't space on the disc for both a live image and the nec
Brian C. Lane (b...@redhat.com) said:
> Not for F17. Maybe for F18 if I can figure out a way to do it that
> wouldn't confuse the heck out of everyone already using live to do their
> install.s
>
> The reason why I dislike liveinst is that by launching it from a running
> system the environment s
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:51:05PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> One angle on this that didn't get pointed out, I guess because anaconda
> team apparently isn't reading, is that at least one person on the
> anaconda team - I forget who - hates liveinst with a passion and has
> been proposing fore
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I've got two reviews I need completed which are dependencies for
> another package I'd like to submit.
>
> Pivy
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458975
>
> zipios++
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812058
I've starte
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
>> One angle on this that didn't get pointed out, I guess because anaconda
>> team apparently isn't reading, is that at least one person on the
>> anaconda team - I forget who - hates liveinst with a pas
I've got two reviews I need completed which are dependencies for
another package I'd like to submit.
Pivy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458975
zipios++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812058
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://ad
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
> One angle on this that didn't get pointed out, I guess because anaconda
> team apparently isn't reading, is that at least one person on the
> anaconda team - I forget who - hates liveinst with a passion and has
> been proposing forever to kill it and repla
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 10:04 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 09:55 -0800, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Nathanael D. Noblet
> > wrote:
> > > How bout adding/changing the icon for installing? Can we not include some
> > > text in the icon? "Install Fed
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 10:04 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 09:55 -0800, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Nathanael D. Noblet
> > wrote:
> > > How bout adding/changing the icon for installing? Can we not include some
> > > text in the icon? "Install Fed
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Jared K. Smith
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>> I can no longer reproduce this on 3.3.1-5, so I'm assuming I was indeed
>> running an older kernel when kernel compiles shut down my machine for
>> overheating. I've updated the bugzi
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Jared K. Smith wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
I can no longer reproduce this on 3.3.1-5, so I'm assuming I was indeed
running an older kernel when kernel compiles shut down my machine for
overheating. I've updated the bugzilla item to reflect
On Tue 17 Apr 2012 10:53:19 AM PDT, Tom Callaway wrote:
I think Dennis did a comparison between f15-updates and f16 (ga), as
opposed to f16-updates.
~tom
==
Fedora Project
I confirmed that. I looked at my packages and noticed the packages
compare the f16 GA rather the f16-update.
Interesti
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Paul Wouters wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675433
Actually, it looks like what they did to fix that might have caused it
to happen to me. I'll go back to 3.3.0-4 and see if it still happens.
I can no longer reproduce this on 3.3.1-5, so I'm assuming
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 05:39 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > So I really see two options for improving these situations:
> > 1) https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/663 I opened this ticket two
> > months ago (to silence). The idea would be to add the ability for
> > bodhi
> > updates to mark other u
dist-f15-updates > f16 (perl-SUPER-1.17-7.fc15 perl-SUPER-1.17-5.fc16)
Please fix the(se) issue(s) as soon as possible.
---
This report generated by Fedora Release Engineering, using
http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=releng;a=blob;f=scripts/check-upgrade-paths.py;hb=HEAD
--
Fed
On 04/17/2012 01:41 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:24:18PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> Is something wrong? I just re-checked the updates I pushed and I did
>> push updates of the same EVR to both F15 and F16...
>>
>> Richard
>>
> +1, I think something is wrong with the report
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:24:18PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Is something wrong? I just re-checked the updates I pushed and I did
> push updates of the same EVR to both F15 and F16...
I've received the same message for several packages I maintain. So I'm
going to guess it's a broken script runn
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:24:18PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Is something wrong? I just re-checked the updates I pushed and I did
> push updates of the same EVR to both F15 and F16...
>
> Richard
>
+1, I think something is wrong with the reporting tool. I just got upgrade
broken emails for al
Infrastructure is aware of the issue.
-J
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Based on the packages and builds I'm getting these for, yes, I'd say
> so, probably a script error, but I'm not sure.
>
> -J
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> Is something w
Based on the packages and builds I'm getting these for, yes, I'd say
so, probably a script error, but I'm not sure.
-J
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Is something wrong? I just re-checked the updates I pushed and I did
> push updates of the same EVR to both F15 and F16..
Richard Shaw wrote:
> Is something wrong? I just re-checked the updates I pushed and I did
> push updates of the same EVR to both F15 and F16...
>
> Richard
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From:
> Date: Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:17 PM
> Subject: Broken upgrade path(s) detected f
That's my fault I probably shouldn't have included f16 in there just updates
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Richard Shaw wrote:
Is something wrong? I just re-checked the updates I pushed and I did
push updates of the same EVR to both F15 and F16...
Richa
Is something wrong? I just re-checked the updates I pushed and I did
push updates of the same EVR to both F15 and F16...
Richard
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:17 PM
Subject: Broken upgrade path(s) detected for: yaml-cpp
To: hobbes1...@fedoraproject
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> I can no longer reproduce this on 3.3.1-5, so I'm assuming I was indeed
> running an older kernel when kernel compiles shut down my machine for
> overheating. I've updated the bugzilla item to reflect this.
Suspend is no longer working for m
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 15:43 +0200, Thomas Woerner wrote:
> On 04/13/2012 07:13 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mar 26, 2012, at 4:21 AM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
> >>>
> >> firewalld-config is not finished, yet. I am working on it.
> >
> > This is still not in F17 beta RC4 which means it's not
commit 19e3f9e52afa9d94646a92f677f12221ce1abdbf
Author: Richard M. Shaw
Date: Tue Apr 17 10:09:22 2012 -0500
Update to latest upstream release.
.gitignore |1 +
ChangeLog | 221 ---
abi-compliance-checker.spec
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for abi-compliance-checker:
eecd82f930f5404e83f2b5a151a89625 abi-compliance-checker-1.97.4.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedo
Summary of changes:
19e3f9e... Update to latest upstream release. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fe
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012, Paul Wouters wrote:
Subject: Re: 3.3.1-5.fc17.x86_64.debug power management and overheating
issue
Could be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675433
Actually, it looks like what they did to fix that might have caused it
to happen to me. I'll go back to 3.3.0-4 a
Hi,
from http://fedorasolved.org/Members/zcat/shrink-lvm-for-new-partition
"Boot into rescue mode and on the last step make sure to SKIP mounting
your filesystems under /mnt/sysimage
Activate LVM
* lvm vgchange -a y"
If I boot into rescue mode at the not skip mounting, I got a message
that c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lets try again. its really Fedora 17 Beta, we have not yet entered a
time vortex and skipped ahead, But now is a great time to work on or
see what will be coming next in Fedora 18 :)
El Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:17:02 -0500
Dennis Gilmore escribió:
> ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: update to 1.97.x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813340
Summary: update to 1.97.x
Product: Fedora
Version: 17
Platfo
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 02:21:36PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
>>> So the plan is:
>>> 1) remove 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7 from compat-db
>>> 2) put 4.8 to compat-db
>>> 3) make db4 a dead package
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 02:21:36PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
>> So the plan is:
>> 1) remove 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7 from compat-db
>> 2) put 4.8 to compat-db
>> 3) make db4 a dead package
>> (db4 package name is not very descriptive any more as we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Look, up in the sky! It's a bird, it's a plane, it's... the Beta
release of Beefy Miracle! Flying 'round the world at the speed of the
intertubes, delivering progress, mustard, and freedom to the masses.
We are delighted to announce the availability
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Look, up in the sky! It's a bird, it's a plane, it's... the Beta
release of Beefy Miracle! Flying 'round the world at the speed of the
intertubes, delivering progress, mustard, and freedom to the masses.
We are delighted to announce the availability
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 02:21:36PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> So the plan is:
> 1) remove 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7 from compat-db
> 2) put 4.8 to compat-db
> 3) make db4 a dead package
>(db4 package name is not very descriptive any more as we have
> libdb-5.3 ...)
Sounds great. For Fedora 17 a
Summary of changes:
09bf4b8... update to 0.04 (*)
c2c3371... clean up spec for modern rpmbuild (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fed
commit c2c33714f717403d7a658ce6dec91a915a36d4b0
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Tue Apr 17 07:41:54 2012 -0600
clean up spec for modern rpmbuild
perl-DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault.spec | 13 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DBIx-Class-DynamicDef
commit 09bf4b8b960e5da0b686846b8c5ef74429903aef
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Tue Apr 17 07:40:47 2012 -0600
update to 0.04
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault.spec | 15 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed,
Compose started at Tue Apr 17 08:15:04 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-ds-base]
389-ds-base-1.2.11-0.1.a1.fc18.x86_64 requires libdb-5.2.so()(64bit)
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby
perl-RPM2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.x86_64 requires librpmio.so.2()(64bit)
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.x86_64 requires librpm.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.i686 requires librpmio.so.2
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.i6
On 04/13/2012 07:13 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mar 26, 2012, at 4:21 AM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
firewalld-config is not finished, yet. I am working on it.
This is still not in F17 beta RC4 which means it's not going to be in the beta
at all. I'm a little mystified why firewalld would ship
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault:
0f4ae1e7bc8a638f679922b387fbb011 DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault-0.04.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> it seems to be the right time to do an unification/reorganization of
> Oracle (Berkeley) DB packages in rawhide. The current situation is that
> there are three of them:
>
> compat-db - shipping old libdbs for compatibility (4.5,4
Hi all,
it seems to be the right time to do an unification/reorganization of
Oracle (Berkeley) DB packages in rawhide. The current situation is that
there are three of them:
compat-db - shipping old libdbs for compatibility (4.5,4.6 and 4.7)
db4 - shipping latest 4.x libdb series (4.8)
libd
Compose started at Tue Apr 17 08:15:05 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8
[aeolus-configserver]
aeolus-configserver-0.4.5-1.fc17.noarch require
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 08:40 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> # Date: 2012-04-16
> # Time: 15:00 UTC
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
> # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
>
> Greetings testers!
>
> Apologies for the late notice b
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 08:41:44PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Also, when i close the lid, the suspension icon keeps blinking and the
> laptop does not actualy suspend.
I'm seeing this, luckily I haven't hit your overheating issues :) About to
try 3.3.2-1 to see if this helps.
Christophe
pgptE
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 21:28 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2012, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> > Subject: Re: 3.3.1-5.fc17.x86_64.debug power management and overheating
> > issue
> >
> > Could be
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675433
>
> Actually, it looks like what they
67 matches
Mail list logo
