Today we have a Fedora Test Day for JBoss Application Server, more
information on the wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-04-17_JBoss_Application_Server
See you on IRC!
--Marek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012, Chris Murphy wrote:
Subject: Re: 3.3.1-5.fc17.x86_64.debug power management and overheating issue
Could be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675433
Actually, it looks like what they did to fix that might have caused it
to happen to me. I'll go back to 3.3.0-4 an
Could be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675433
On Apr 16, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone else seeing issues with 3.3.1-5.fc17?
>
> My thinkpad X201 both overheats and shuts down:
>
> Apr 16 20:30:19 thinkpad kernel: [ 5508.559650] intel ips :00:
Hi,
Is anyone else seeing issues with 3.3.1-5.fc17?
My thinkpad X201 both overheats and shuts down:
Apr 16 20:30:19 thinkpad kernel: [ 5508.559650] intel ips :00:1f.6: MCP
limit exceeded: Avg temp 9572, limit 9000
Apr 16 20:30:24 thinkpad kernel: [ 5513.556695] intel ips :00:1f.6: MCP
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 17:39 -0400, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:11 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > Do we have a schedule for Fedora 18 yet?
>
> Robyn is great at keeping the scedules updated -- they're typically in
> her directory on fedorapeople.org. Here are the key dates for
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:11 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> Do we have a schedule for Fedora 18 yet?
Robyn is great at keeping the scedules updated -- they're typically in
her directory on fedorapeople.org. Here are the key dates for F18:
http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-18/f-18-key-task
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 01:41:58PM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Basically, I think the guidelines MJG has put together are good
> principles; they just need some procedural blanks filled in so SA
> teams know how to apply them and communicate with the greater Fedora
> community.
I think a bett
Hi,
I found http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Schedule and there seems
to be a relatively easy way to determine the Fedora 18 Release date.
Tuesday before October 31st. So most probably Tuesday, 30th October
2012, if I am not mistaken.
HTH
Johannes
On 04/16/2012 10:11 PM, David Malcolm w
Do we have a schedule for Fedora 18 yet?
I've started creating a feature page for getting Python 3.3 into Fedora:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python_3.3
but it's not clear to me yet how well the Python 3.3 upstream schedule
lines up with Fedora's schedule. So for now I've simply use
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL:
0f104165ff7da7f46aa8d9c10ac61bdf IO-Socket-SSL-1.66.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
On 04/03/2012 08:21 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
[snip]
> We need to
make the whole process one with continuous feedback, or it's never going to
work.
So I'd expect that we don't want to specify anything all that precisely -
I'd rather you come up with an implementation plan to satisfy each point,
and
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 10:24 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> I'm working on a package that uses a wrapper script to start the
>> daemon, so as the subject says:
>>
>> Can I use Type=simple if the daemon uses a wrapper script or am I
>> stuck
Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:57:29PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
>
> > Packages which have SysV initscripts that contain 'non-standard service
> > commands' (commands besides start, stop, reload, restart, or
> > try-restart) must convert those commands into s
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-04-16)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 17:05:17 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-04-16/fesco.2012-04-16-17.05.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:57:29PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> Packages which have SysV initscripts that contain 'non-standard service
> commands' (commands besides start, stop, reload, restart, or
> try-restart) must convert those commands into standalone helper scripts.
> Systemd does not suppo
On 14/04/12 20:32 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 04:57:29 PM Tom Callaway wrote:
A bundling exception for boost within Passenger was granted, due to the
intrusive nature of the forked changes, the efforts of the maintainer to
merge as many of them as possible into t
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 10:24 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> I'm working on a package that uses a wrapper script to start the
>> daemon, so as the subject says:
>>
>> Can I use Type=simple if the daemon uses a wrapper script or am I
>> stuck
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 10:24 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm working on a package that uses a wrapper script to start the
> daemon, so as the subject says:
>
> Can I use Type=simple if the daemon uses a wrapper script or am I
> stuck with Type=forking?
AIUI yes, but you have to exec the real bina
I'm working on a package that uses a wrapper script to start the
daemon, so as the subject says:
Can I use Type=simple if the daemon uses a wrapper script or am I
stuck with Type=forking?
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2012-04-16
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
Apologies for the late notice but we're still planning to hold a QA
meeting in a couple hours. Please
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 02:03:45PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> Compose started at Mon Apr 16 08:15:05 UTC 2012
>
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
> [vdsm]
> vdsm-4.9.3.2-0.fc17.x86_64 requires /usr/sbin/saslpasswd2
Jindrich Novy
Compose started at Mon Apr 16 08:15:05 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[389-ds-base]
389-ds-base-1.2.11-0.1.a1.fc18.x86_64 requires libdb-5.2.so()(64bit)
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby
On 04/16/2012 03:16 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 00:03 -0400, John Ellson wrote:
Before I generate a bug report, could I get a second opinion on whether
this is a bug or a feature?
Console logins through gdm are not getting recorded in lastlog.
(Fedora 16)
I think it is a bug. I
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 12:17 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> We've always built packages coming from the GNOME FTP and that follow
> the GNOME releases. Matthias did it, I did it, Tomas did it, and now
> Richard is doing it.
Hi,
hmm, I do not see any x.x.x-1 build being done by any of those
On 04/16/2012 10:44 AM, Adam Tkac wrote:
Hello all,
named service is disabled after F16->F17 update via yum due to
initscripts->systemd conversion. It wasn't possible to keep it enabled when was
due to too many differences between initscripts and systemd unit files.
As written in https://bugzil
Compose started at Mon Apr 16 08:15:03 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8
[aeolus-configserver]
aeolus-configserver-0.4.5-1.fc17.noarch require
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 11:13 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 13:53 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > If you're maintaining a GNOMEish package and you want it included in
> > the 3.4.1 release, please build the package like normal and then add
> > the build ID to:
> >
> > https://doc
Hello all,
named service is disabled after F16->F17 update via yum due to
initscripts->systemd conversion. It wasn't possible to keep it enabled when was
due to too many differences between initscripts and systemd unit files.
As written in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808889, this
On 16 April 2012 11:32, Milan Crha wrote:
> Maybe he's just _currently_ busy, sleeping (consider different
> timezones) and so on? Anyway, I never asked to have those packages part
> of the auto-build list, and never was asked for acceptance. This is
> easily distinguishable, isn't it?
I was aske
commit 3b4ca404602122a806aee61ddb439674373ba925
Author: Daniel P. Berrange
Date: Mon Apr 16 11:33:53 2012 +0100
Update to 0.9.11 release
perl-Sys-Virt.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Sys-Virt.spec b/
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sys-Virt:
ef7cc31803667fbb894bff5a13692d68 Sys-Virt-0.9.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 10:33 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> ...
> If you had already updated F17 with the upstream 3.4.1 then
> the automatic script would have ignored your package completely.
Hey,
I didn't have much time to do so. You script stepped in only two hours
after release on Gnome
On 16 April 2012 10:13, Milan Crha wrote:
> it will be kind of you to not touch packages you do not own, especially
> those which are actively maintained. The way you did it breaks "build
> the package like normal" from your instructions.
In the same way I've emailed for your two other privately
Hello,
I have several package reviews pending to be approved, and I also need a
sponsor. Is there any willing sponsor who can help me with this? I can swap
reviews if there is someone interested in a non informal review.
One of my packages is gogoc, a client for the IPv6 tunnel broker
freenet6.ne
On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 13:53 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> If you're maintaining a GNOMEish package and you want it included in
> the 3.4.1 release, please build the package like normal and then add
> the build ID to:
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9waFJFZmgyQzB
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 00:03 -0400, John Ellson wrote:
> Before I generate a bug report, could I get a second opinion on whether
> this is a bug or a feature?
>
> Console logins through gdm are not getting recorded in lastlog.
> (Fedora 16)
I think it is a bug. It might be solvable by adding
16.04.2012 09:33, Toshio Kuratomi написал:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 02:02:31AM +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
16.04.2012 00:51, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:16:58PM +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
As I look it for me for first glance.
Install or update one package scenario (yum in
37 matches
Mail list logo
