"Horst H. von Brand" writes:
> [...]
> Please go with (3), keeping generated files in git is just dumb.
Please don't demean those who do it for well-considered reasons.
- FChE
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Colin Walters wrote:
[...]
> Incidentally - keeping the generated autotools stuff in git makes
> tracking down what *really* changed extremely painful. It looks
> like the ABI was bumped in ee6696fdf4768ba6dd037fb6dd99435afa13816e
> but that commit has thousands of lines of generated code chang
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:04:05 +0100
Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 14 April 2012 22:31, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > What about using a page on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ ?
>
> Unless I'm mistaken, you can't have more than one person editing a
> wiki page at the same time. Seeing as there's normally
On 14 April 2012 22:31, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> What about using a page on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ ?
Unless I'm mistaken, you can't have more than one person editing a
wiki page at the same time. Seeing as there's normally 3 or 4 of us
building packages simultaneously, it needs to be instan
>>> If you're maintaining a GNOMEish package and you want it included in
>>> the 3.4.1 release, please build the package like normal and then add
>>> the build ID to:
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9waFJFZmgyQzBuN2VxU0lxbHc
>>
>>Can we not find a way to coord
On Saturday, April 14, 2012 03:11:46 PM Rex Dieter wrote:
> No need for this to be mutually exclusive, unless one (or both) of you
> are averse to being comaintainers?
>
I'm objecting based on the matters of principle and due process.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
--
Systems Architect, Kol
On 04/14/2012 02:32 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 04:57:29 PM Tom Callaway wrote:
A bundling exception for boost within Passenger was granted, due to the
intrusive nature of the forked changes, the efforts of the maintainer to
merge as many of them as possible into th
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 04:57:29 PM Tom Callaway wrote:
> A bundling exception for boost within Passenger was granted, due to the
> intrusive nature of the forked changes, the efforts of the maintainer to
> merge as many of them as possible into the upstream boost source tree,
> and the visible
Hello!
I'm a 17 year old high school student living in the northeast United States.
For the past two years I've been distro surfing and I think I've found a home
in Fedora, and want to contribute. What better place to start than to package
some of the missing software that I use? I'm starting with
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:21:15PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:53:18PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:49:29PM
Am 14.04.2012 18:39, schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:21:15PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
>> wrote:
>>> I'm not arguing that's how yum works now, but it doesn't have to work
>>> that way!
>>>
>>> It could incrementally down
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:21:15PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:53:18PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:49:29PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:1
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:53:18PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:49:29PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:11:40AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> > > So that's a factor of 25
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 15:52:18 +0200,
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Richard Hughes wrote:
If you're maintaining a GNOMEish package and you want it included in
the 3.4.1 release, please build the package like normal and then add
the build ID to:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiG
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 20:58 -0400, Anthony Green wrote:
> Sorry folks -- thanks for untagging. I'll ping the list again after May 9,
> as was suggested earlier in this thread.
Here's a lightly tested patch which implements my suggestion of keeping
the symbols as empty stubs.
Incidentally - keep
Richard Hughes wrote:
> If you're maintaining a GNOMEish package and you want it included in
> the 3.4.1 release, please build the package like normal and then add
> the build ID to:
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9waFJFZmgyQzBuN2VxU0lxbHc
Can we not find a wa
If you're maintaining a GNOMEish package and you want it included in
the 3.4.1 release, please build the package like normal and then add
the build ID to:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9waFJFZmgyQzBuN2VxU0lxbHc
Most of the packages released on ftp.gnome.org with t
On 04/14/2012 12:26 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
I hope that systemd always supports sysV, has part of specification of
systemd. IMHO.
It will for sometime due to 3rd parties but that does not give us an
excuse to not migrate all our legacy sysv init scripts to native systemd
units.
Hopefully we
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 04:52 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> b) upstream wont accept submitted units with /etc/sysconfig/ files
> which
> means those that still want to do this will need start carrying
> patches
> in the form of EnvironmentFile=-/etc/sysconfig/$SERVICE against
> upstream
Compose started at Sat Apr 14 08:15:03 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8
[aeolus-configserver]
aeolus-configserver-0.4.5-1.fc17.noarch require
Mattia Verga wrote:
> Greetings,
> I saw the changes in packaging guidelines related to PIE:
>
> /If your package meets the following criteria you *MUST* enable the PIE
> compiler flags: /
>
> * /Your package is long running. This means it's likely to be started
> and keep running until th
21 matches
Mail list logo
