Summary of changes:
5cb4ba9... Bump release due to typo in spec. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fed
commit 5cb4ba9dc0d73be20fd85f5dc5ebf7200f457c27
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Thu Apr 12 07:55:56 2012 +0200
Bump release due to typo in spec.
perl-HTML-Lint.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-HTML-Lint.spec b/perl-HTML-Lint.spec
ind
commit da04feb8cfa889a74630ed055f83caab2a3f9cb2
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Thu Apr 12 07:45:35 2012 +0200
Cleanup.
perl-HTML-Lint.spec |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-HTML-Lint.spec b/perl-HTML-Lint.spec
index 0b230dd..2506553 100644
--
Summary of changes:
722ee33... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*)
7c701ea... Upstream update. (*)
da04feb... Cleanup.
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs
Summary of changes:
7c701ea... Upstream update. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
commit 7c701ea5bc18e3b93ed8435d407d0deebb903df4
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Thu Apr 12 07:40:49 2012 +0200
Upstream update.
.gitignore |2 +-
perl-HTML-Lint.spec | 10 +++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTML-Lint:
c6063f33797d6a36dc3ae2e0c3d06ded HTML-Lint-2.20.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
Summary of changes:
3d25560... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*)
9d719e5... Upstream update. (*)
71ad38c... Cleanup. (*)
2b67422... Cleanup.
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedorapr
commit 2b674224fa0f9fe1a0c0205db5e41d897318ccef
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Thu Apr 12 07:08:39 2012 +0200
Cleanup.
perl-Log-Dispatch-Perl.spec |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Log-Dispatch-Perl.spec b/perl-Log-Dispatch-Perl.spec
index 10
commit e287da6d3eb608af786cf05ec77c428e5a1e5ea7
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Thu Apr 12 07:10:47 2012 +0200
Cleanup.
perl-Log-Dispatch-Perl.spec |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Log-Dispatch-Perl.spec b/perl-Log-Dispatch-Perl.spec
index 6d
Summary of changes:
8580528... Perl mass rebuild (*)
3d25560... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*)
9d719e5... Upstream update. (*)
71ad38c... Cleanup. (*)
2b67422... Cleanup. (*)
e287da6... Cleanup.
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no sep
commit 71ad38c498485aa6ec165933b2d53e63022abe8c
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Thu Apr 12 07:03:38 2012 +0200
Cleanup.
.gitignore |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 083c5ff..7258d31 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitigno
Summary of changes:
9d719e5... Upstream update. (*)
71ad38c... Cleanup. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://
At today's F17 Beta Go/No-Go meeting, the Fedora 17 Beta release was
declared gold. F17 Beta will be released Tuesday, April 17, 2012.
Thanks to everyone involved for pulling this one together and
participating in the meetings, things came together well this week. :)
For those interested in t
Anyone knows what's the holdup with the Samba update (CVE-2012-1182)? No
new builds have been done or queued up recently AFAICT...
--
Bojan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Ryan Lewis wrote:
> I'm proposing that we consider a new type of extra software package:
> foo-profile. This
> package would be close to a "release" build of software, but, would
> have options such as
> "-fno-emit-frame-pointer" enabled.
>
> Having stack frame pointers enabled within libraries is
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I'm not arguing that's how yum works now, but it doesn't have to work
> that way!
>
> It could incrementally download the RPMs during depsolving, test that
> they work together, and with that information download further
> packages as necessary ...
I don't think that's
http://freeplane.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
Will there be a Freeplane package available on the F17 repository (& Is
there a Freeplane Fedora package maintainer)?
I am using Freemind 0.9 on F15. It is not without problems.
Thank you
--
nomnex
Freenode: nomnex
Registered Linux user
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
> On 04/11/2012 10:34 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>
>>
>> You can still login at this prompt with your 'root' account and
>> password. From that point, you can look at /var/log/Xorg.0.log to see
>> what happened that caused your X Window System t
Hi,
My name is Ryan. I'm a PhD student in Computer Science, and fedora
ambassador/packager.
I am really busy academically, so my exposure to the project is
limited. In my work within
computational topology, I do quite a bit of high performance
computing. My current project
being the design and imp
please ignore, sent it to the wrong list, apology.
On 04/11/2012 04:26 PM, Avesh Agarwal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have implemented traffic selector negotiation functionality for ikev2
> based on rfc 5996. I am attaching a patch for the same. The current
> patch is based on rhel6 openswan version, and
Hello,
I have implemented traffic selector negotiation functionality for ikev2
based on rfc 5996. I am attaching a patch for the same. The current
patch is based on rhel6 openswan version, and I am working on porting it
to latest upstream version. Still I thought to send it to devel mail
list to g
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:33:39AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:20:07AM +0200, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>
> [..]
> > >I think vmcore should not be moved by ABRT. At max they can create
> > >a soft link to vmcore present in /var/crash.
> > >
> >
> > - yes, we're going to tea
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Kalev Lember wrote:
This is the reason why I find it important to make the life as good as
possible for the power users / developers / enthusiasts: when the they
like using Fedora and developing software with Fedora, they're likely to
also invite other people to try Fedora o
Hi everyone,
My name is Tony Asleson and I have been working at Red Hat since July.
I'm currently working on libStorageMgmt, a library to manage external
storage arrays.
The project location:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/libstoragemgmt/
My review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:32:18AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > BTW: Why is the agenda not in the wiki? Or was I to stupid to find it?
>
> No real reason. Is there a namespace already on the wiki for agendas, or
> shall we just add it under the kernel namespace ?
Our agenda is usually pretty fre
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807613
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2012-04-11
12:49:30 EDT ---
perl-Socket-2.001-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794712
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:53:18PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:49:29PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:11:40AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > So that's a factor of 25ish more data in the Requires list. No, thanks.
> >
> > I'm ass
Got it all updated, it's in koji, 0.19-18 is what you want. Thanks,
Josef
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> If it's only updated in rawhide, what will be the state of btrfs-progs in F17?
>
> On Apr 10, 2012, at 7:10 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>
>> Hrm sorry, I need to update bt
Hi, folks. You may have noticed a 17 Beta RC4.1 directory show up on the
mirror:
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/17-Beta.RC4.1
and been asking yourself what it is. Well, wonder no more. We built the
live images for Beta RC4 with livecd-tools 17.7, in an attempt to fix
this bug:
https:/
On 03/26/2012 03:54 PM, Adrian Reber wrote:
> Trying to build gforth with gcc 4.7 fails currently. The forth engine is
> build but it fails its included tests. The problem is that every newline
> the forth engine writes is replaced with 0x00 as seen in following diff:
>
> 010: 6566 696e 6564
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 04:48:38PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > [*] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Meeting_channel
>
> Related question: Should
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kernel/2012-March/003711.html
> ([PATCH] rawhide: enable HYPERV drivers) also be on the agenda? I
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:49:29PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:11:40AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > So that's a factor of 25ish more data in the Requires list. No, thanks.
>
> I'm assuming your argument is that you don't want to ship RPMs or
> repositories wher
On 04/11/2012 05:19 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:08:13PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
>> On 8.4.2012 22:50, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> And, as I said, the alternative is that this gets turned off, by me
>>> and probably a very large fraction of other Fedora users.
>>
>> Without g
On 04/11/2012 10:21 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:58:55PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 14:04 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> Option 2: Disable ptrace for everything except direct child processes.
>>> Allows the common case of running a task direc
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:11:40AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> So that's a factor of 25ish more data in the Requires list. No, thanks.
I'm assuming your argument is that you don't want to ship RPMs or
repositories where part of them grows to be 25x larger.
But this need not be the case. Observ
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 07:19:32AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> > I've had some reports recently that appeared to suggest that in F17,
> >> > GFS2 was no longer being supported by the kernel. Having investigated
> >> > this, it appears that the root cause is that the gfs2.ko module has been
>
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:58:55PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 14:04 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Option 2: Disable ptrace for everything except direct child processes.
> > Allows the common case of running a task directly under a tool like gdb
> > or strace, but forb
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:08:13PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 8.4.2012 22:50, Tom Lane wrote:
> >And, as I said, the alternative is that this gets turned off, by me
> >and probably a very large fraction of other Fedora users.
>
> Without getting into this discussion much, I would just note a bi
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 22:52 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) said:
> > The 'qemu' package has a bug, of sorts: the maintainer should have
> > added a specific Requires line:
> >
> > Requires: usbredir >=
> >
> > However, instead of pushing this problem on
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 14:04 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Option 2: Disable ptrace for everything except direct child processes.
> Allows the common case of running a task directly under a tool like gdb
> or strace, but forbids attaching one to an already running task. May
> break some of the
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:20:07AM +0200, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
[..]
> >I think vmcore should not be moved by ABRT. At max they can create
> >a soft link to vmcore present in /var/crash.
> >
>
> - yes, we're going to teach it to use links
> (https://fedorahosted.org/abrt/ticket/448)
Thanks. Just
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 07:19:32 -0400,
Josh Boyer wrote:
We can move it back if needs be. Honestly, we might wind up just
disabling the rest of the stuff contained in there and dropping the
sub-package entirely. We're still kind of undecided on whether it's
worth doing at all. Thus far th
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 07:19 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> > Well that is one possibility - I'm trying to find the documentation that
>> > explains the criteria for modules being moved into the
>> > kernel-modules-extra package and I've not
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811526
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Hi,
I've opened bug #811547 for this issue,
Steve.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
commit 86bff3804ab5bce0249ba5b45d942939fc096625
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Wed Apr 11 05:38:34 2012 -0600
update to 0.3
.gitignore |1 +
perl-File-Path-Tiny.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810721
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System 2012-04-11
07:33:53 EDT ---
perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-Catalyst-0.57-1.fc17 has been subm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810721
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-Path-Tiny:
46a1687953b02a0456f5a0ed65d1a396 File-Path-Tiny-0.3.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
Hi,
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 07:19 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Steven Whitehouse
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 10:55 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:52:19AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I'v
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 10:55 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:52:19AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I've had some reports recently that appeared to suggest that in F17,
>> > GFS2 w
Hi,
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 10:55 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:52:19AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've had some reports recently that appeared to suggest that in F17,
> > GFS2 was no longer being supported by the kernel. Having investigated
> >
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:52:19AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've had some reports recently that appeared to suggest that in F17,
> GFS2 was no longer being supported by the kernel. Having investigated
> this, it appears that the root cause is that the gfs2.ko module has been
> mov
Hi,
I've had some reports recently that appeared to suggest that in F17,
GFS2 was no longer being supported by the kernel. Having investigated
this, it appears that the root cause is that the gfs2.ko module has been
moved to a package called kernel-modules-extra (although the kernel RPM
still cont
On 04/11/2012 09:20 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 04/10/2012 03:09 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
...
Thirdly, it breaks the existing behavior. So abrt maintainers, please
change this behavior. Don't break thinkgs by default. I think hardcoding
the logic to look into /var/crash/ for vmcores or creating
On 04/10/2012 03:09 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:17:37AM +0200, Michal Toman wrote:
On 2012/10/04 09:48, Cong Wang wrote:
On 04/09/2012 05:32 PM, Dave Young wrote:
On 04/09/2012 04:55 PM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
> From kdump side of view, the vmcore should be there inst
58 matches
Mail list logo
