On 03/04/12 07:52, Gilboa Davara wrote:
Any chance of building a personal repository for F17 or better yet, F16?
- Gilboa
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/2012-April/001082.html
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:/
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> greetings.
>
> Xfce 4.10pre1 is out... and I am going to look at landing it in rawhide
> in the next few days.
>
> Hopefully there won't be too much disruption caused by this (it's 17
> packages), just wanted to give rawhide Xfce users a head
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 15:00 -0400, Roland Grunberg wrote:
> Is anyone else getting similar issues?
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Roland Grunberg
I have the same problem, see bug
808983: pdebuild script fails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808983
I have found http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/
On 04/03/2012 01:22 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> On 03/31/2012 02:12 AM, Linda Wang wrote:
>
>> per Fedora team members:
>>>
>>> There is a simple process for this already, using the pkgdb tool, with
>>> documentation on the Fedora wiki:
>>>
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb
>>> http://fedorap
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Actually I think this is a good feature, but ...
I'm unsure about whether this makes sense for new installs or not, but I
feel my objection in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/tmp-on-tmpfs was not taken into
account at all. :-/ Forcing this change on upgra
This is feedback vs the current version of the following web page:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements_%28Draft%29
It would be nice if the bullet points were numbers so they could be
referenced numerically.
> Promoting an architecture to primary archite
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I don't seem to see this
>
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4828
Looks like it was unpushed recently, and re-queue'd (pending).
-- rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 04/02/2012 07:44 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 06:34:59PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> >* #834 F18 Feature: /tmp on tmpfs -
> >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs (mitr, 17:40:0
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 20:39 +0100, James Wilkinson wrote:
>> From there, it follows that the easiest way to do this is to make 002
>> the default umask, which means that all new files and directories
>> created by normal users have these permissions. T
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 06:34:59PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> >* #834 F18 Feature: /tmp on tmpfs -
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs (mitr, 17:40:06)
> > * AGREED: tmp-on-tmpfs is accepted (+5 -3
Am 03.04.2012 00:34, schrieb Przemek Klosowski:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> * #834 F18 Feature: /tmp on tmpfs -
>>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs (mitr, 17:40:06)
>>* AGREED: tmp-on-tmpfs is accepted (+5 -3) (mitr, 18:12:52)
>
I don't seem to see this
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4828/xine-lib-1.1.20.1-3.fc17,emacs-24.0.94-3.fc17,calibre-0.8.42-1.fc17,perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17,techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17
here: http://dl.fe
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
* #834 F18 Feature: /tmp on tmpfs -
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs (mitr, 17:40:06)
* AGREED: tmp-on-tmpfs is accepted (+5 -3) (mitr, 18:12:52)
The wiki page says:
By implementing this we, by default,
I have updated nss in Rawhide to the upstream tag NSS_3_13_4_BETA1.
The list of bugs fixed on 3.12.4 can be found at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741135
Please see on this list to if there is anything of concern to products you use
or maintain.
Some highlists:
The primary dri
* M A Young [02/04/2012 23:51] :
>
> This also means a big change in user experience as many will be
> expecting things in /tmp to remain there for a while before being
> deleted even if the system is restarted or crashes.
The expectations of these 'many' (this really needs to be measured)
run cou
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 02.04.12 16:55, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
What about forensics? Any reboot erases information that might have been needed
to see what happened during a break in.
/tmp is already volatile and cleaned up in regular intervals. T
On 2 April 2012 14:55, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Monday, April 02, 2012 03:58:12 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> > * #834 F18 Feature: /tmp on tmpfs -
>> >
>> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs (mitr, 17:40:06)
>> > * AGREED: tmp-on-tmpfs is accepted (+5 -3) (mitr, 18:12:52)
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 20:58:12 +0100,
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
- it doesn't support O_DIRECT
I thought this was also true of ext4 with data journaling enabled.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) said:
> > > - it doesn't support user extended attrs; and not very old kernels
> > > didn't support any xattrs at all, meaning things like SELinux
> > > labels don't work
> >
> > Huh? Why would you run a "very old kernel" on fedora?
>
> It's not unknow
On Mon, 02.04.12 16:55, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Monday, April 02, 2012 03:58:12 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > * #834 F18 Feature: /tmp on tmpfs -
> > >
> > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs (mitr, 17:40:06)
> > > * AGREED: tmp-on-tmpfs is accepted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/02/2012 04:25 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 02.04.12 20:58, Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Heya,
>
>> The feature page is wrong about "The user experience should barely
>> change. This is mostly a low-level change t
On Monday, April 02, 2012 03:58:12 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > * #834 F18 Feature: /tmp on tmpfs -
> >
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs (mitr, 17:40:06)
> > * AGREED: tmp-on-tmpfs is accepted (+5 -3) (mitr, 18:12:52)
>
> Actually I think this is a good feature, bu
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 04:40:38PM -0400, David Quigley wrote:
> You don't specify seclabel as an option. It is something that is put
> into the mount command to show you that a filesystem supports being
> able to set security labels on it.
OK, I see. In fact I tested this and I was able to set S
On Mon, 02.04.12 21:30, Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > - it doesn't support user extended attrs; and not very old kernels
> > > didn't support any xattrs at all, meaning things like SELinux
> > > labels don't work
> >
> > Huh? Why would you run a "very old kernel" on fed
On 04/02/2012 16:26, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 04:11:24PM -0400, David Quigley wrote:
On 04/02/2012 16:06, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>That's not what I said. I said that relatively recent kernels (up
to
>the middle of last year) didn't support system.*, and tmpfs doesn
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 10:24:38PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > - it doesn't support O_DIRECT
>
> Neither does this (which apps needs O_DIRECT on /tmp ? ).
qemu and libguestfs as it turned out. It was one of the things we had
to fix when
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808886
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2012-04-02
16:25:56 EDT ---
perl-CPAN-Meta-2.120921-1.fc17, perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirement
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 04:11:24PM -0400, David Quigley wrote:
> On 04/02/2012 16:06, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >That's not what I said. I said that relatively recent kernels (up to
> >the middle of last year) didn't support system.*, and tmpfs doesn't
Sorry, I meant to write security.* there.
On Mon, 02.04.12 20:58, Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
Heya,
> The feature page is wrong about "The user experience should barely
> change. This is mostly a low-level change that has little visibility
> to the user."
Well, i'd claim this is not really user visible if implemented
c
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> * #834 F18 Feature: /tmp on tmpfs -
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs (mitr, 17:40:06)
>> * AGREED: tmp-on-tmpfs is accepted (+5 -3) (mitr, 18:1
On 04/02/2012 16:06, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 04:04:23PM -0400, David Quigley wrote:
On 04/02/2012 15:58, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>>* #834 F18 Feature: /tmp on tmpfs -
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fe
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 04:04:23PM -0400, David Quigley wrote:
> On 04/02/2012 15:58, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> >>* #834 F18 Feature: /tmp on tmpfs -
> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs (mitr,
> >>17:40:06)
On 04/02/2012 15:58, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
* #834 F18 Feature: /tmp on tmpfs -
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs (mitr,
17:40:06)
* AGREED: tmp-on-tmpfs is accepted (+5 -3) (mitr, 18:12:52)
Actually I
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> * #834 F18 Feature: /tmp on tmpfs -
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs (mitr, 17:40:06)
> * AGREED: tmp-on-tmpfs is accepted (+5 -3) (mitr, 18:12:52)
Actually I think this is a good feature, but ...
The fea
I've spent far too much time working on this, but I still haven't gotten
it 100% working (the browser tests still fail). I'm not entirely sure
these fixes are correct either, so I'm just sharing what I've
accomplished here and moving on.
~tom
==
Fedora Project
diff -up openvrml-0.18.8/src/libopen
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Roland Grunberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I seem to be getting the following build failure on rawhide :
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3957940
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3957950&name=build.log
>
> The actual error I see in t
2012/3/27 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> On 03/27/2012 05:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> I assume that that mod_access_compat module only requires a few bytes, so> I
>> don't see why it should not be loaded by default forever (or at least as
>> long as upstream supports it, which hopefully will be for
Hi,
I seem to be getting the following build failure on rawhide :
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3957940
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3957950&name=build.log
The actual error I see in the Tycho source is indicative of the folder
(/usr/lib/eclipse) not ex
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Now at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements_%28Draft%29
FESCo would welcome more discussion of this draft, and plans to vote
on it next week.
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-04-02)
===
Meeting started by mitr at 17:00:54 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-04-02/fesco.2012-04-02-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
On 04/02/2012 10:59 AM, Dmitriy Nikolaev wrote:
> Uups... I'm sorry. OK. I got it. THank you once again for your help
> and explanations.
>
> With best regards.
Happy to help. :)
--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
Uups... I'm sorry. OK. I got it. THank you once again for your help
and explanations.
With best regards.
On 2 April 2012 20:56, Digimer wrote:
> On 04/02/2012 10:45 AM, Dmitriy Nikolaev wrote:
>> Thank you for your fast answer.
>> That's interesting. But, could you, please, tell me also, if in t
On 04/02/2012 10:45 AM, Dmitriy Nikolaev wrote:
> Thank you for your fast answer.
> That's interesting. But, could you, please, tell me also, if in the
> future, not now, I would like to participate in kernel developing,
> then is it possible to join those guys?
Please reply to the mailing list. T
On 04/02/2012 10:34 AM, Dmitriy Nikolaev wrote:
> Hello , guys!
>
> I would like to participate in developing Fedora releases(coding,
> mostly in C/C++). Could you tell me, where I can find a source code
> and other relative things, for instance, headers and libraries
> descriptions?
>
> Thank yo
Hello , guys!
I would like to participate in developing Fedora releases(coding,
mostly in C/C++). Could you tell me, where I can find a source code
and other relative things, for instance, headers and libraries
descriptions?
Thank you beforehand for your answers.
With best regards.
--
devel mai
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPAN-Meta:
83d00ee341ca2a6d8d5e5f9d4bd9d41e CPAN-Meta-2.120921.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
Please join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this
important meeting. This will be Round 2 of this meeting for the Beta
release of F17.
Wednesday, April 4, 2012 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine
Summary of changes:
f70b3dc... initial import (rhbz#808886) (*)
e732886... clean up spec following review (*)
5175155... run release/author tests too (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extr
commit 517515599c77633b6f477b7a8ed7facbd676c718
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Mon Apr 2 10:12:26 2012 -0600
run release/author tests too
perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements.spec | 16 +++-
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements.spe
commit e7328866305415c4e1a21234a490bf11c0abc836
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Mon Apr 2 08:31:58 2012 -0600
clean up spec following review
perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements.spec |7 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements.spec b/perl
commit f70b3dc315b76a45717f141bc5119345932c6590
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Mon Apr 2 07:57:17 2012 -0600
initial import (rhbz#808886)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements.spec | 57 ++
sources
may "Failed to gnutls_bye: Error in the push function" be the
root cause of the problem?
something seems borked in gnutls of Fedora 16, libmicrohttpd is even
built without tests since a long time and not rebuilt for the
last year caused by failing build with autotests, the openvas
packages itself
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808855
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808886
--- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth 2012-04-02 10:42:06 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > In my local
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:11:35PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> I'm planning on moving this to the Wiki (as a draft) at the end of the
> week, so if people have any further feedback please let me know.
Now at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements_%28Draft
perl-RPM2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.x86_64 requires librpmio.so.2()(64bit)
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.x86_64 requires librpm.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.i686 requires librpmio.so.2
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.i6
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:21:42 +0200
Ruben Kerkhof wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 18:00, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 14:55:56 +0200
> > Ruben Kerkhof wrote:
> >
> >> Due to lack of time I'd like to orphan a few of my packages, being:
> > ...snip...
> >> incron
> > ...snip...
> >
> >
php-pear-Net-DNS and php-pear-Net-IPv4 are marked as "deprecated" since
March 28th (not only orphaned, and without any annoucement here)
I will take both (by SCM request)
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Ruben Kerkhof wrote:
> Due to lack of time I'd like to orphan a few of my packages, being:
>
> python-wokkel
I took this.
-J
> They're all low-maintenance packages with a release maybe once or twice a
> year.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Ruben
> --
> devel mailing list
Compose started at Mon Apr 2 08:15:13 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 06:52:27PM +0200, Tim Niemueller wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> To test our robot software against the newest and shiniest compilers and
> libs we have a rawhide VM. Today I noticed a very annoying problem
> (after not using the VM for a while), but I'm not sure if it's on our
> side
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 23:06 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On a fresh install (such as this one), I do a restore from a backup
> file as I always do, to include doiong the same thing in F16 (that
> worked just fine) and the settings are there, and set as suppose to
> be. Also evolution-bogofilter i
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 02:55:56PM +0200, Ruben Kerkhof wrote:
> perl-Nagios-Plugin
Took this one.
-P
pgpcf3Ehnv3f5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> So I really see two options for improving these situations:
> 1) https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/663 I opened this ticket two
> months ago (to silence). The idea would be to add the ability for
> bodhi
> updates to mark other updates as a dependency, so that in the example
> above, Firefox
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 18:00, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 14:55:56 +0200
> Ruben Kerkhof wrote:
>
>> Due to lack of time I'd like to orphan a few of my packages, being:
> ...snip...
>> incron
> ...snip...
>
> I find incron very handy... I'll take it if no one else does.
>
> Co-maintai
x27;ll be doing some review and RC3 planning. Also, we
didn't get to the 'QA as a sub-project' topic last week, so let's sign
off on it this week.
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wik
66 matches
Mail list logo
