[Test-Announce] 2012-03-12 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2012-03-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 22:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting > # Date: 2012-03-12 > # Time: 15:00 UTC > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) > # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Official Meeting Announcement Errata: Yes, I forgot

NSS update to 3.13.3 coming soon

2012-03-11 Thread Elio Maldonado
NSS 3.13.3 has been relessed and it's built for Rawhide/F-17-alpha/F-16/F15. A push to update-testing for f17 will be coming shortly - to f16/f15 som time later. You can find the new features and bug fixes in NSS 3.13.2 and 3.13.3 with these Bugzilla queries: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglis

[Test-Announce] 2012-03-05 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2012-03-11 Thread Adam Williamson
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2012-03-12 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's meeting time once more. We'll be cranking up Beta TCs soon, and Test Days are about to start up

Re: Non-free tarball checked in

2012-03-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:46:03 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > I checked in a tarball for egoboo that turned out to have a non-free > (noncommercial restriction) font file in it. The tarball has only > been used for local builds (no scratch-builds). Do I need to remove > this tarball from the lookas

pdfs and gpl v2

2012-03-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
egoboo is a gpl v2 project that provides some pdf documentation files in the same tarball as the source. Is it OK to distribute those? (I didn't any other license noted in these files but I could have missed one.) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/

Non-free tarball checked in

2012-03-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
I checked in a tarball for egoboo that turned out to have a non-free (noncommercial restriction) font file in it. The tarball has only been used for local builds (no scratch-builds). Do I need to remove this tarball from the lookaside cache? If so how do I do it? The hash is e6f3130695d297dcd9fe74e

Re: Need help with GNOME ?

2012-03-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 18:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 15:48 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > > > which has a lot of people tacked on as well (not sure why abrt couldn't > > handle > > the other 60 though...) It ain't glamorous, but all those extra bugs should > > probably

Re: Need help with GNOME ?

2012-03-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 15:48 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > which has a lot of people tacked on as well (not sure why abrt couldn't handle > the other 60 though...) It ain't glamorous, but all those extra bugs should > probably just be duped to that report. You could do that in about ten seconds wi

Re: More explanation requested for warning about rawhide inheriting updates

2012-03-11 Thread Kevin Kofler
Eric Smith wrote: > I've seen that done, but didn't know the purpose. I think it's the > right case in my situation. I've updated muParser in rawhide, and am > pushing updates for F16 and F17. muParser has a new so version. > Meshlab depends on muParser, but meshlab currently won't build in F17

Re: Need help with GNOME ?

2012-03-11 Thread Cole Robinson
On 03/10/2012 02:00 PM, Nelson Marques wrote: > Is there anything I can help (main packaging related or triage/bug > fix) regarding GNOME in Fedora? > Hey, I was actually about to send a mail that intersects with your request. Take a look at this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quickse

Re: Enet update for Red Eclipse packaging, request for help

2012-03-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 15:22:11 +0100, Martin Erik Werner wrote: > > The current maintainer of both Egoboo and Enet seems busy and has not > had time to update Enet since a request[2] was filed in Sep 2011. And > did, at least earlier, say that it would be fine if another proven > packager too

Re: Enet update for Red Eclipse packaging, request for help

2012-03-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 15:22:11 +0100, Martin Erik Werner wrote: > Hello, I'm in the process of packaging the game Red Eclipse[0] for > Fedora (bug #800930[1]), but in order for Red Eclipse to not bundle the > Enet lib, it needs to be updated from 1.2 to 1.3 in Fedora (bug #739313 > [2]). There

Enet update for Red Eclipse packaging, request for help

2012-03-11 Thread Martin Erik Werner
Hello, I'm in the process of packaging the game Red Eclipse[0] for Fedora (bug #800930[1]), but in order for Red Eclipse to not bundle the Enet lib, it needs to be updated from 1.2 to 1.3 in Fedora (bug #739313 [2]). There seems to currently be only one package depending on enet/enet-devel in Fedor

rawhide report: 20120311 changes

2012-03-11 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun Mar 11 08:15:11 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [HippoDraw] HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-

F-17 Branched report: 20120311 changes

2012-03-11 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Sun Mar 11 08:15:11 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [HippoDraw] HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-