Re: More explanation requested for warning about rawhide inheriting updates

2012-03-10 Thread Eric Smith
Bruno Wolff III wrote: Rawhide inherits from updates of the most recent branch, which is currently the branched release (f17). Updates will inherit from the release. A package is only inherited if there are no builds for it at the current level. [and more good explanation] Thanks! That's ex

Bodhi comment emails issue fixed

2012-03-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. In the last week or so, there was an issue with bodhi sending emails to update submitters when comments were left on their updates. Note that this issue did not effect bodhi comments (ie, pushed to testing, pushed to stable, being pushed, etc), only comments left by users / autoqa. Th

Re: gluErrorString not defined in GL/glu.h? [SOLVED]

2012-03-10 Thread Richard Shaw
Never mind... I blame it on my flu induced state. For some reason the qmake project didn't have it linking against libGLU... Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

gluErrorString not defined in GL/glu.h?

2012-03-10 Thread Richard Shaw
I'm working on building a package, qantenna[1], and I'm running into the following error: g++ -o ../bin/qantenna ../qt/obj/gl.o ../qt/obj/camera.o ../qt/obj/datamanager.o ../qt/obj/glwidget.o ../qt/obj/line.o ../qt/obj/main.o ../qt/obj/mainwindow.o ../qt/obj/about.o ../qt/obj/neccontainer.o ../qt

Re: Emesene package mantainer

2012-03-10 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Caterpillar wrote: > I opened a bugreport about the nonresponsive package mantainer of emesene. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797260 > This is the third point of procedure > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers

Need help with GNOME ?

2012-03-10 Thread Nelson Marques
Is there anything I can help (main packaging related or triage/bug fix) regarding GNOME in Fedora? -- Nelson Marques // I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of bread in the middle... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma

Re: /etc/default in Fedora

2012-03-10 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 05:20:35PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > So, please all just use a subdir directly in /etc with the name of the > package/subsystem, and put your files in there, This really ought to be a Fedora guideline. It is a recommendation in Debian, and has been since as long as I can

Re: f16 log flooded with dbus-daemon/upowerd warnings

2012-03-10 Thread Mike Chambers
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 07:53 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > I've got a lot of messages like this: > > Mar 9 07:31:49 nbecker1 dbus-daemon[987]: ** (upowerd:1208): WARNING **: > Property get or set does not have an interface string as first arg Check below.. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi

Emesene package mantainer

2012-03-10 Thread Caterpillar
I opened a bugreport about the nonresponsive package mantainer of emesene. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797260 This is the third point of procedure https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers Does anybody know how to contact him? -- devel mailing list

Re: Notice: IPv6 breaking issues tentatively considered blocker for F17

2012-03-10 Thread Tore Anderson
* Chris Adams > Once upon a time, Ralf Ertzinger said: >> SLAAC will not give you DNS servers. > > The RAs can (and do on my home network) include DNS servers and search > prefixes. You're both right, in a way. IPv6 addressing can come from either RAs (SLAAC), DHCPv6, or both; IPv6 DNS servers

Re: /etc/init.d/network buggy in F16

2012-03-10 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 10.03.2012 16:20, schrieb Frank Murphy: > On 10/03/12 12:22, Reindl Harald wrote: >> something is broken in /etc/init.d/network >> first my (minimal) obfuscated configuration >> >> last block are strange error-messages from /var/log/messages >> after "systemctl restart network.service" >> >> fo

Re: /etc/init.d/network buggy in F16

2012-03-10 Thread Frank Murphy
On 10/03/12 12:22, Reindl Harald wrote: something is broken in /etc/init.d/network first my (minimal) obfuscated configuration last block are strange error-messages from /var/log/messages after "systemctl restart network.service" for which component should i file a bugreport? only "NetworkManag

Re: fedpkg question: no f17 branch

2012-03-10 Thread Jamie Nguyen
Neal Becker wrote: > What do I need > to do to update my copy to include f17 branch? Just do "fedpkg switch-branch f17" and the branch will automagically appear :-) Jamie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

F16: odd messages about /sys/fs/ and /sys/kernel/

2012-03-10 Thread Reindl Harald
after upgrade to F16 on my testmachine dovecot complaints about some "mount-points" which at all seemes to be growing from release to relase - the "mount" output becomes really frustrating and "df" is still showing "bind-mounts" Mar 10 13:37:45 testserver dovecot: master: Warning: /sys/fs/cgroup/c

/etc/init.d/network buggy in F16

2012-03-10 Thread Reindl Harald
something is broken in /etc/init.d/network first my (minimal) obfuscated configuration last block are strange error-messages from /var/log/messages after "systemctl restart network.service" for which component should i file a bugreport? only "NetworkManager"-components in bugzilla ___

Re: phoronix benchmarks ext4 vs. btrfs

2012-03-10 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 09.03.2012 06:19, schrieb Chris Murphy: > The one anomaly is the 3rd ext4 copy. > Maybe it wasn't quite done writing out the 2nd copy? this usually happens without explicit "sync" > Compared to btrfs and XFS, there was a lot of intermittent disk activity > well after the copy had finished

Re: More explanation requested for warning about rawhide inheriting updates

2012-03-10 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 02:14:50 -0800, Eric Smith wrote: > The "Join the package collection maintainers" page gives the warning: > > I've never really understood that, but it's never previously caused > me any concern. Since I am now in a situation where I want to push > an update to a branch

Re: Notice: IPv6 breaking issues tentatively considered blocker for F17

2012-03-10 Thread Tore Anderson
* Adam Williamson > At the meeting, we made the call that IPv6-only networks are becoming > a configuration sufficiently important that a serious breach of the > criteria in the context of an IPv6-only network is significant enough > to be considered a release blocker, and we accepted the bug as

Re: fedpkg question: no f17 branch

2012-03-10 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 09:04 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > What do I need > to do to update my copy to include f17 branch? git pull ? Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

fedpkg question: no f17 branch

2012-03-10 Thread Neal Becker
fedpkg switch-branch Locals: f12 f13 f14 f15 f16 * master Remotes: origin/el4 origin/el5 origin/f10 origin/f11 origin/f12 origin/f13 origin/f14 origin/f15 origin/f16 origin/f17 origin/f7 origin/f8 origin/f9 origin/fc6 origin/master So IIUC, I have

Re: Notice: IPv6 breaking issues tentatively considered blocker for F17

2012-03-10 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Ralf Ertzinger said: > SLAAC will not give you DNS servers. The RAs can (and do on my home network) include DNS servers and search prefixes. -- Chris Adams Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough troubl

Re: Notice: IPv6 breaking issues tentatively considered blocker for F17

2012-03-10 Thread Ralf Ertzinger
Hi. On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:46:56 -0600, Chris Adams wrote > DHCPv6 is not the only way to configure dynamic IPv6; my home network > is using SLAAC. IMHO that will probably be more common in home and > other small networks. The only thing I'd be missing for v6-only > would be the ability to set

Re: Notice: IPv6 breaking issues tentatively considered blocker for F17

2012-03-10 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said: > To be more precise...DHCPv6 is blocked. So I guess if you used a static > network config it would work. DHCPv6 is not the only way to configure dynamic IPv6; my home network is using SLAAC. IMHO that will probably be more common in home and other small n

Re: Old Fedora versions and bugzilla

2012-03-10 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Mattia Verga [10/03/2012 11:53] : > > Il 09/03/2012 23:56, Emmanuel Seyman ha scritto: > > >Bugzilla did not have the ability to retire versions until 4.2 [ snip ] > I don't think this is working as expected... It isn't working at all. Red Hat's Bugzilla is v3.6 so it doesn't have that fix yet

More explanation requested for warning about rawhide inheriting updates

2012-03-10 Thread Eric Smith
The "Join the package collection maintainers" page gives the warning: Be sure that you build for rawhide (master) branch before pushing updates for any other branches! Otherwise, those updates will get inherited into rawhide, which is almost certainly not what you want. I've never really unde

Re: User session printing

2012-03-10 Thread Tim Waugh
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 08:21 -0900, Jef Spaleta wrote: > Back to the use case of a primarily single user laptop touching > multiple networks on a daily basis. For that situation is it expected > that the default print server will still be the laptop's own cup > server for networked printers? Netwo

Re: Old Fedora versions and bugzilla

2012-03-10 Thread Mattia Verga
Il 09/03/2012 23:56, Emmanuel Seyman ha scritto: * Mattia Verga [09/03/2012 23:26] : why bugzilla should accept to create bugs for unmaintained versions? Is there a logic that I cannot see, or it could be a thing to tweak? Bugzilla d