-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/04/2012 12:11 AM, Roopesh Majeti wrote:
> Iam going for a long break and would like to know the place/link , where
> i can place the request for un-subscription. Can someone help me in this
> regards.
>
>
> TIA
>
> Regards
> RM.
>
The bot
Iam going for a long break and would like to know the place/link , where i
can place the request for un-subscription. Can someone help me in this
regards.
TIA
Regards
RM.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 03/03/2012 11:07 AM, David Zeuthen wrote:
Hi,
- Original Message -
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 08:42 -0600, Greg Swift wrote:
This sounds pretty straightforwardly like a bug probably in
PolicyKit, to me. It's obviously more correct to use the current
user's authorization if it's sufficie
On 03/03/2012 03:22 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Scott Doty wrote:
How about allowing all printer management of local printers (including
adding a network printer, as Linus& his daughter were dealing with) with
two factors:
1) user password
2) physical access
..
On 03/02/2012 04:16 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 05:21 -0600, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
For printers, currently installing printers does not require superuser
privileges, but managing those printers installed by that user does.
Is it possible to make it so that printers installed
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Scott Doty wrote:
> How about allowing all printer management of local printers (including
> adding a network printer, as Linus & his daughter were dealing with) with
> two factors:
>
> 1) user password
> 2) physical access
>
> ...because PolKit already knows when
On Mar 3, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> A complete lockdown to prevent transferring data out of the system is
> a much harder problem (even if you only allow users to run a web
> browser, they may use it to send data to a server).
Yeah, you're right, I can just open a gmail or dropbox
On 03/03/2012 02:19 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mar 3, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
-> Don't ask for re-auth for an action that isn't really potentially harmful
(e.g., adding a printer)
Depends. What if what's being added is a rem
On 03/02/2012 03:21 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
For printers, currently installing printers does not require superuser
privileges, but managing those printers installed by that user does.
Is it possible to make it so that printers installed by that user can
be managed by the user without
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> -> Don't ask for re-auth for an action that isn't really potentially harmful
>> (e.g., adding a printer)
>
> Depends. What if what's being added is a remote printer, that's merely a way
> to s
On Mar 3, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>>
>
> Here's one part of the principle:
>
> I. The ONLY reason for re-auth is to prevent trojans/web attacks.
>
> This implies
>
> -> Don't ask for re-auth for an action that isn't really potentially harmful
> (e.g., adding a printer)
Depends
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 10:18 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 21:53 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > In case anyone's wondering what that actually does, here's what I can
>> > figure out.
>> >
>> > What it does directly is to add the user
Hi,
- Original Message -
> On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 08:42 -0600, Greg Swift wrote:
> > I experience a similar scenario. On my home system (f16) I have my
> > wife and both in the wheel group. Every time I go to run
> > virt-manager
> > I get prompted for her password. I do believe she is f
Am 02.03.2012 17:55, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> On 03/02/2012 10:15 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> * writing the systemd-unit takes 2 minutes for postfix
>> * no need for package anything, install put it locally in /etc/systemd/system
>> * so testing takes another 3 minutes, no compile needed
>
> T
Le 03/03/2012 09:20, Remi Collet a écrit :
> Package which need to be rebuild
> - opensips
> - php-pecl-memcached
and - python-pylibmc (forgotten in previous list)
are done
If nobody against, I will do the update in F17 next monday.
(with a long buildroot overide for gearmand, whi
Le 03/03/2012 09:20, Remi Collet a écrit :
> Package which need to be rebuild
> - gearmand
It seems this one if FTBFS in f17...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/790432
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 09:20:47 +0100
Remi Collet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just build libmemcached 1.0.4 in rawhide.
>
> This introduce a soname bump (libmemcached.so.8 to .9)
>
> Package which need to be rebuild
> - opensips
> - php-pecl-memcached (and a new version also available)
>
Hi,
Could someone please review this package ->
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798738
Thank you.
---
Regards
-Prasad
http://feedmug.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
FYI, I released parted-3.1 yesterday,
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.parted.bugs/10790
In addition to pretty many bug fixes,
This is to announce parted-3.1, a bug fix release that also reintroduces
a minimal subset of the file system resizing capability that was removed
i
Hi,
I just build libmemcached 1.0.4 in rawhide.
This introduce a soname bump (libmemcached.so.8 to .9)
Package which need to be rebuild
- opensips
- php-pecl-memcached (and a new version also available)
- proftpd
- gearmand
API changes seems minor.
http://upstrea
20 matches
Mail list logo
