Hi all,
Just as the subject. I did not find this perl module Pod::Plainer.
This module is required by LSB dist test for LSB 4.1. But I did
not find in LSB DB tables.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 15:43 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 06:48:00PM +0100, Thomas Woerner wrote:
> > On 03/01/2012 04:52 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> >> On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Jerry J
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 17:43 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 16:39 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> > I believe Fedora 17 has an add user to admin group checkbox when
> > adding the initial user, not sure if it is checked on or off by default.
>
> Off by default (having just tri
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:46 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 07:02 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> > I think he's got a point
> >
> > http://www.osnews.com/story/25659/Torvalds_requiring_root_password_for_mundane_things_is_quot_moronic_quot_
>
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rel
Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> PS: it would be useful to have some GUI tool to configure PolicyKit.
> Everytime I clean my system I have to dig through dozens of manual
> pages just to get virt-manager without a password for my user.
https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/base/polkit-kde-kcmodule
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/01/2012 05:43 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 16:39 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>> I believe Fedora 17 has an add user to admin group checkbox when
>> adding the initial user, not sure if it is checked on or off by
>> default
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 17:09:43 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Yep.
>
> rpkg broke it. I have untagged it. Should be back to working after the
> next newrepo.
I re-tagged this back in after a new fedpkg landed. They both needed to
be there to work.
Please shout if you see buildroots failing again.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:46:44 -0700
Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Rawhide Report
> wrote:
> > [emacs]
> > 1:emacs-24.0.94-1.fc18.x86_64 requires
> > libMagickWand.so.4()(64bit) 1:emacs-24.0.94-1.fc18.x86_64 requires
>
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 23:17:27 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3844852
>
> failed with:
>
> BuildError: error retrieving sources, mock exited with status 1; see
> build.log for more information
>
> Digging deeper:
>
> DEBUG util.py:307:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3844852
failed with:
BuildError: error retrieving sources, mock exited with status 1; see build.log
for more information
Digging deeper:
DEBUG util.py:307: Executing command: ['fedpkg', 'sources']
DEBUG util.py:257: Could not execute source
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 16:39 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> I believe Fedora 17 has an add user to admin group checkbox when
> adding the initial user, not sure if it is checked on or off by default.
Off by default (having just tried it today).
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digita
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/29/2012 04:03 PM, Scott Doty wrote:
> On 02/29/2012 08:46 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 07:02 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
>>> I think he's got a point
>>>
>>> http://www.osnews.com/story/25659/Torvalds_requiring_root_password_f
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:43:50PM -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > There will be a dhcpv6 service entry for firewalld soon and later on
> > also for system-config-firewall.
> >
> > Where how and when it will and could be enabled will be evaluated.
>
> I'm going to have to chime in and say we /r
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 06:48:00PM +0100, Thomas Woerner wrote:
> On 03/01/2012 04:52 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Jerry James
> Interesting. I'm seeing kind of the inverse problem:
On 03/01/2012 04:52 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Jerry James
Interesting. I'm seeing kind of the inverse problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771130. Could that be
related to the issu
On 03/01/2012 06:52 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
As new Fedora release looms ahead, I'd like open discussion about
verifying distribution integrity. In short---where to get public key for
verifying RPM signatures.
If I remember correctly, you are asked to accept new signing key by rpm
while installing
If I remember correctly, Revisor x86_64 is not working since Fedora 14. At the
time I ended up working with livecd-creator. Today (in F16), however, I was
curious to see if there were improvements in Revisor and find that the same bug
"Cannot find anaconda-runtime in /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime" i
Dne 1.3.2012 17:52, Petr Pisar napsal(a):
where to get public key for verifying RPM signatures.
The keys are at: https://fedoraproject.org/keys
Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 10:52 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
> >> * Jerry James
> >>
> >>> Interesting. I'm seeing kind of the inverse problem:
> >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=77113
As new Fedora release looms ahead, I'd like open discussion about
verifying distribution integrity. In short---where to get public key for
verifying RPM signatures.
If I remember correctly, you are asked to accept new signing key by rpm
while installing fedora-release package from new Fedora relea
Hello everyone,
my name is Franco Comida and I joined this mailing list because I want
to become a maintainer of Luminance HDR for Fedora. I am one of the
developers of the program since 2009 an a Red Hat/Fedora user for a long
time. This is the link of the review request I filed on bugzilla:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Jerry James
Interesting. I'm seeing kind of the inverse problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771130. Could that be
related to the issues discussed in this thread?
Hard to tell
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 00:34 +0100, Jarosław Górny wrote:
> Wiadomość napisana przez Bruno Wolff III w dniu 2012-02-27, o godz. 16:29:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 14:00:51 +,
> > Frank Murphy wrote:
> >> On 27/02/12 13:52, elison.ni...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 4) Quit on single CTRL-C.
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Jerry James
>
> > Interesting. I'm seeing kind of the inverse problem:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771130. Could that be
> > related to the issues discussed in this thread?
>
> Hard to tell, without (preferably debu
On Thu, 01.03.12 15:16, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:11:53PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > Also you should really define 'You' here. Because the issue is that mDNS
> > > in Fedora is inserted by default in the hosts database and IIRC before
> > >
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:11:53PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Also you should really define 'You' here. Because the issue is that mDNS
> > in Fedora is inserted by default in the hosts database and IIRC before
> > DNS, so it get a chance to always reply before a DNS query is made. This
>
On Wed, 29.02.12 18:27, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 00:17 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Wed, 29.02.12 17:51, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 10:09 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > > On Feb 29, 2012, at 5:15 AM, drago01
Hi all,
due to license change in Ruby, rubygem-main and rubygem-fattr licenses have
been changed (after clarification with the author).
Previous licenses were GPLv2+ or Ruby, current licenses are BSD or Ruby.
The change applies to F17 and rawhide.
--
Regards,
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.
--
devel
Hi Fedora package maintainers
Please pull latest translation for your package, re-package with it and push to
koji for L10N QA test [1] by 2-Mar. We will have a live image to be composed
for this particular test on 5-Mar. The focus is to test translations
availability and accuracy in desktop ap
Dne 29.2.2012 20:13, Jesse Keating napsal(a):
unless we move away from using master for rawhide and instead always
have a specific branch for each release.
Please don't do that. Thank you.
Vit
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
30 matches
Mail list logo
