On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 20:41 -0500, David Quigley wrote:
> On 02/23/2012 14:28, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Dear fellow developers,
> >
> > with the upcoming Fedora 18 release (currently Rawhide) we are going
> > to
> > change the place where krb5 credential cache files are saved by
> > default.
On 2012-02-23 10:20, John5342 wrote:
It is possible that they don't match but they are more or less
required to though. Last i checked the bugzilla "editbugs" permissions
and the like are set from fas by email address so if the addresses
don't match up then the user won't be able to manage bugzil
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 14:28 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Dear fellow developers,
>
> with the upcoming Fedora 18 release (currently Rawhide) we are going to
> change the place where krb5 credential cache files are saved by default.
>
> The new default for credential caches will be the /run/u
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 23:58 +, David Howells wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > with the upcoming Fedora 18 release (currently Rawhide) we are going to
> > change the place where krb5 credential cache files are saved by default.
> >
> > The new default for credential caches will be the
On 02/23/2012 14:28, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Dear fellow developers,
with the upcoming Fedora 18 release (currently Rawhide) we are going
to
change the place where krb5 credential cache files are saved by
default.
The new default for credential caches will be the
/run/user/
directory.
Th
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> with the upcoming Fedora 18 release (currently Rawhide) we are going to
> change the place where krb5 credential cache files are saved by default.
>
> The new default for credential caches will be the /run/user/
> directory.
Alternatively, you could put them in the ke
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 14:07 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> > If you have any questions feel free to contact any of the people in CC.
>
> Thanks for this heads' up. I maintain a package that hardcodes a /tmp
> path: https://bugzilla.redha
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> If you have any questions feel free to contact any of the people in CC.
Thanks for this heads' up. I maintain a package that hardcodes a /tmp
path: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/796910 . (I'm not really following
how you've set up the Blo
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 12:59 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 23 February 2012 12:28, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Dear fellow developers,
> >
> > with the upcoming Fedora 18 release (currently Rawhide) we are going to
> > change the place where krb5 credential cache files are saved by defau
Original Message
Subject: [389-devel] please review ticket #211 - dnaNextValue gets
incremented even if the user addition fails
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:32:52 -0500
From: Mark Reynolds
Reply-To: 389 Directory server developer discussion.
<389-de...@lists.fedoraprojec
Dear fellow developers,
with the upcoming Fedora 18 release (currently Rawhide) we are going to
change the place where krb5 credential cache files are saved by default.
The new default for credential caches will be the /run/user/
directory.
The reason is to make credential saving a bit more pred
On 02/23/2012 07:10 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
No, the LSB headers can be correct, they are simply not honored in all
cases. For instance, look at my rdma init script in the rdma package.
Even though I list all the things that are required-stop, those things
Does it work better if you use "Should
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 15:33, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> Yes. Since the emails don't necessarily match up, I don't think you
> can rely on querying the database. Not only is it less efficient, it
> can break too! (In most cases the emails probably will match up
> anyway, but you can't rely on it.)
It
On 2/23/2012 8:52 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On 02/21/2012 06:31 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
>> it honors all the LSB dependency tags in the SysV init scripts, and
>> my experience is that this is specifically where a number of the
>> emulation startup bugs exists.
>
> What do you mean? That the LSB
On 2/19/12 3:43 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 2012-02-18 20:26, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 02/18/2012 11:05 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
You can get the completion to work according to that preference with for
example yum install ./foo - anything that looks like a filesystem
path triggers filename-only
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.10.2. No new features were added after alpha 8, just
many bug fixes. There are also 389-adminutil, 389-admin, and 389-dsgw
packages in Testing.
NEW: EL6 support
Beginning with RHEL 6.2, the 389-ds-base package is inc
On 2/17/12 12:43 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
I actually have no idea how to access that account. So saying that
releng has access is a gross overstatement. There is an account that
some people have access to use is a more correct statement.
I believe my bugzilla account had the rights to create n
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 05:19:01PM +0100, Roman Rakus wrote:
>
> Look at stdlib xml - it tries to import _xmlplus. And it will replace stdlib
> with nonstd. It's kind of "what?". I can try to report bug on it.
>
Ugh. Yeah -- so it looks like the code there assumes that python-2.7 xml
libraries do
On 23.2.2012 16:54, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
It's not as simple as saying that a library provides something that has the
same names as modules in the stdlib, you also have to figure out
compatibility and whether removing it will cause any problems for software
that Fedora ships.
Completely agree
I have just pushed an updated jetty 8.1.x into rawhide and F17[1]. Most
of the things should work and it would be nice if it got some wider
testing since we updated from 6.x to 8.1.x between F16 and F17.
If you have a web application or anything that you use with jetty,
please try it out and repo
On 02/23/2012 05:32 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 05:26:25PM +0100, Roman Rakus wrote:
On 02/22/2012 09:08 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:46:19AM +0100, Roman Rakus wrote:
On 02/16/2012 05:33 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
For just -O3 or -O2 -ftree-vectorize
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 05:26:25PM +0100, Roman Rakus wrote:
> On 02/22/2012 09:08 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:46:19AM +0100, Roman Rakus wrote:
> >>On 02/16/2012 05:33 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >>>For just -O3 or -O2 -ftree-vectorize we could perhaps have some knob in
>
On 02/22/2012 09:08 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:46:19AM +0100, Roman Rakus wrote:
On 02/16/2012 05:33 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
For just -O3 or -O2 -ftree-vectorize we could perhaps have some knob in
the spec files to request those extra flags, for PGO it really requires
Summary of changes:
f5ee887... Initial commit (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
On 02/23/2012 04:54 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:48:11PM +0100, Roman Rakus wrote:
Hi all,
looks like PyXML package is deprecated since python itself provides
xml mechanisms.
When you look deeper,
python's xml provides:
"dom", "parsers", "sax", "etree"
and PyXML provides
Summary of changes:
f5ee887... Initial commit (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
Summary of changes:
f5ee887... Initial commit (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:42:05 +0100
> From: Kevin Kofler
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Package review: SC - Script Collection
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Simon Erat wrote:
> > What has been prepared so far:
> > * http://sf.net/p/seasc (sour
Greetings.
I've just added a f17-branched instance to my set of test instances for
Fedora Package Maintainers.
Please see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers
for more details and access information on all the available instances.
These instances can
Ken Dreyer wrote:
> 2012/2/23 Miroslav Suchý :
>> But I find incredibly hard to find relation between bugzilla email and FAS
>> account.
>> How do you do this check?
>
> I use zodbot's fasinfo command, because it's faster than searching the
> FAS web interface.
>
>> Therefore I suggest to enhance t
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:48:11PM +0100, Roman Rakus wrote:
> Hi all,
> looks like PyXML package is deprecated since python itself provides
> xml mechanisms.
> When you look deeper,
> python's xml provides:
> "dom", "parsers", "sax", "etree"
> and PyXML provides:
> 'dom', 'marshal', 'parsers', 'sa
2012/2/23 Miroslav Suchý :
> But I find incredibly hard to find relation between bugzilla email and FAS
> account.
> How do you do this check?
I use zodbot's fasinfo command, because it's faster than searching the
FAS web interface.
> Therefore I suggest to enhance template of [2] to include line
Johannes Lips wrote:
> Isn't it easiest to just ask for the FAS name of the person who wants to
> become a packager? I don't really see how this should be less efficient than
> searching the mail address in the FAS database.
Yes. Since the emails don't necessarily match up, I don't think you
can r
Isn't it easiest to just ask for the FAS name of the person who wants to
become a packager? I don't really see how this should be less efficient
than searching the mail address in the FAS database.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> Thomas Spura wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 20
Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>> Thomas Spura wrote:
>>> 2012/2/23 Miroslav Suchý :
But I find incredibly hard to find relation between bugzilla email and FAS
account.
How do you do this check?
>>>
>>> Show all useres in the cla_signed g
On 02/23/2012 03:35 PM, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
All services have an [install] section, I just dropped them for this
email. Forgot to pull in C.target where? Should D.service contain
"After=rc-local.service C.target" then?
By "pull in" I mean making it included in the transaction. Ordering
depe
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> Thomas Spura wrote:
>> 2012/2/23 Miroslav Suchý :
>>> But I find incredibly hard to find relation between bugzilla email and FAS
>>> account.
>>> How do you do this check?
>>
>> Show all useres in the cla_signed group [3] and search for the ma
Hi Michal,
>
> Hello,
>
>
> On 02/23/2012 01:34 PM, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
>>
>> Any of the services could fail but that shouldn't affect any of
>> the other services.
>
>
> From this you can deduce the answer to one of your questions.
> You don't want to use Requires then.
Ok.
>> 1) Service A
Thomas Spura wrote:
> 2012/2/23 Miroslav Suchý :
>> But I find incredibly hard to find relation between bugzilla email and FAS
>> account.
>> How do you do this check?
>
> Show all useres in the cla_signed group [3] and search for the mail
> address. When it's not there it may be overritten in [4].
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope:
34aaf65de7886689fdbd398dbf6bc5a3 B-Hooks-EndOfScope-0.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
On 02/21/2012 06:31 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
it honors all the LSB dependency tags in the SysV init scripts, and
my experience is that this is specifically where a number of the
emulation startup bugs exists.
What do you mean? That the LSB headers are incorrect too often?
It's a problem, but tha
2012/2/23 Miroslav Suchý :
> But I find incredibly hard to find relation between bugzilla email and FAS
> account.
> How do you do this check?
Show all useres in the cla_signed group [3] and search for the mail
address. When it's not there it may be overritten in [4].
When it's not there either, t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796642
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796646
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hello,
On 02/23/2012 01:34 PM, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
Any of the services could fail but that shouldn't affect any of
the other services.
From this you can deduce the answer to one of your questions.
You don't want to use Requires then.
1) Service A after the local filesystem is mounted.
2)
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive:
3e3c147aa0e509bfdddf18d48f0335c1 Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.091.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admi
Hi,
I have question about Fedora Review Process. [1]
First time submitter should block FE-NEEDSPONSOR. But since they are new
to the process they very often forgot to do that.
So I always try to check whether given bugzilla email already has FAS
account and if it is in packager group.
But I f
commit 4f2fb84ef94ba4fc099fe00eaf368f2b88858b8f
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Thu Feb 23 13:40:38 2012 +0100
3.91 bump
perl-Object-InsideOut.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Object-InsideOut.spec b/perl-Object-InsideOut.spec
index fe3d60
Hi,
I want to create a package for Fedora 16 but I'm struggling with the
systemd service/target files. I cannot get the various services to execute
in the right order. I have 4 services (they're actually scripts that just
execute and terminate) that need to run in the order described below. Any
of
Compose started at Thu Feb 23 08:15:09 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
= Weekly KDE Summary =
Week: 08/2012
Time: 2012-02-21 15:00 UTC
Meeting page: https://fedoraproject.org
51 matches
Mail list logo
