Hello,
I adjusted the volumn names to reduce the line length. Now
the line length is less than 80. So it's suit to browse in
terminal. And also add two architecures: s390 and s390x.
- Original Message -
From: "Xibo Ning"
To: "fedora-devel"
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 10:13:43 AM
Sub
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Because dropping these dirs from the search paths is merely an
> optimization, not a requirement.
You call it an "optimization", I call it fixing a pessimization (performance
regression).
And as the original message in the thread points out, the regression
actually a
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ugh, we really want this one:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/beefy-miracle-kde-
theme-16.91.0.1-1.fc17,kde-settings-4.8-5.fc17
> in! :-(
>
> Without it, Plasma has a blank (all black) background.
(Proposed) blocker bug filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey, folks. So it turns out all currently identified Alpha blockers are
> addressed, so I went ahead and filed a request for Alpha RC1 rather than
> TC3:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5083
>
> this is two days ahead of schedule, but it's good to get going ea
On Tue, 14.02.12 23:08, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote:
> Ondrej Vasik wrote:
> > You are right, setup update fixed only /sbin locations... /bin has to be
> > done on glibc and shells side. Sorry for confusion...
>
> WHY was UsrMove allowed to be merged in such broken and incomplete
Ondrej Vasik wrote:
> You are right, setup update fixed only /sbin locations... /bin has to be
> done on glibc and shells side. Sorry for confusion...
WHY was UsrMove allowed to be merged in such broken and incomplete state?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
Hey, folks. So it turns out all currently identified Alpha blockers are
addressed, so I went ahead and filed a request for Alpha RC1 rather than
TC3:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5083
this is two days ahead of schedule, but it's good to get going early!
The compose should arrive some t
On 02/14/2012 10:23 AM, Alfredo Ferrari wrote:
Do the systemd maintainers ever read bug reports BTW?
Why do you think otherwise?
Not only read them but fix them as well.
To give you some stats
There are currently 96 Open bugs against systemd and 536 that have been
closed at the time of thi
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 12:59 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> What's the policy to get a bugfix to Alpha?
It should be the case now that 17 is frozen and only blocker/NTH fixes
can land; I don't know if releng has actually implemented that at this
time, but AIUI that's where we should be.
So that'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789784
--- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2012-02-14 12:25:05
EST ---
Please do. Cuts out the middleman.
--
Configure bugmail:
What's the policy to get a bugfix to Alpha?
Jaroslav
- Original Message -
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 23:45:32 -0600
> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> > We have completed mass branching for Fedora 17 you now need make
> > sure
> > that you build t
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:38:29 -0500,
Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
>
> When I subsequently ran a koji administrative command, I got to enter my
> passphrase a few times (and for some reason, while 'pkcs8' will accept
> something fewer than four characters long for a new passphrase, that
> requireme
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:33:31AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> While replacing my koji cert yesterday I was interested in adding a
> passphrase to slow down exploitation if my home desktop got compromised.
> I've look through some of the documentation for maintainers and I haven't
> seen any in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789784
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2012-02-14 12:35:53 EST
---
Will do.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userpre
- Original Message -
> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:11 +0100, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:08 +0100, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Dear developers,
> > >
> > > Now that the /usrmove changes have landed i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789784
--- Comment #5 from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2012-02-14
12:23:49 EST ---
Yup according to commit 2 you just had left the irc yeste
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:33 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:11 +0100, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:08 +0100, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Dear developers,
> > >
> > > Now that the /usrm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789784
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 23:45:32 -0600
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> We have completed mass branching for Fedora 17 you now need make sure
> that you build things for Fedora 17 from the f17 branch, master is now
> for Fedora 18.
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/w
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:11 +0100, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:08 +0100, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Dear developers,
> >
> > Now that the /usrmove changes have landed in the F-17 branch, should
> > the ordering o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/14/2012 05:11 PM, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:08 +0100, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Dear developers,
>>
>> Now that the /usrmove changes have landed in the F-17 branch,
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:08 +0100, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear developers,
>
> Now that the /usrmove changes have landed in the F-17 branch, should
> the ordering of directories in PATH be changed? /usr/bin should appear
> before /bin a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear developers,
Now that the /usrmove changes have landed in the F-17 branch, should
the ordering of directories in PATH be changed? /usr/bin should appear
before /bin and /usr/sbin before /sbin.
Right now $(which a-binary) would report that all /us
While replacing my koji cert yesterday I was interested in adding a
passphrase to slow down exploitation if my home desktop got compromised.
I've look through some of the documentation for maintainers and I haven't
seen any instructions on how to protect it with a passphrase. Is this
possible? (In
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
> On Mon 13 Feb 2012 04:55:03 AM PST, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>
>>
>> Have you filed a bug against that package to alert the maintainer?
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com
>>
>> If not, that would be a great first step.
>>
>
> Done. https://bugzilla
Alfredo Ferrari wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753339
>
> ... and "reboot" is still not working on Fedora 16 on several
> machines...
It's not obvious whether systemd is to blame for this bug.
> do the systemd maintainers ever read bug reports BTW?
Of course. You have comm
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I'm going to reply to both in one go here:
>
>
> drago01 wrote:
>
>>> Why must a desktop resemble the windows 95 UI paradigm?
>
> Because that is what all current computer users are used to! And an
> "inconvenient" fact often ignored in usabil
On 14/02/12 11:05, Camilo Mesias wrote:
Is there a smolt-like solution that wouldn't
be unpalatable to many? It would surely be better than relying on
out-of date and questionable polls. I'd be happy to be counted as
using Gnome shell on several systems.
-Cam
How would you gauge it,
Smolt cur
I wonder if there is a way to accurately gauge hours spent using one
DE or another. I've only ever used Gnome although I tried KDE briefly
(at least one major release ago) and tried other distros Suse and
Ubuntu, but only when Fedora was unstable on my hardware. I blogged a
few 'gotchas' with Gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787216
massimo.pala...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753339
... with clean install and on Fedora 16, two duifferent machines
++
| Alfredo Ferrari || Tel.: +41.22.767.6119 |
| C.E.R.N.
The lightweight tag 'perl-Class-Load-0.17-1.fc16' was created pointing to:
1e3ce9f... Update to 0.17
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753339
... and "reboot" is still not working on Fedora 16 on several machines...
do the systemd maintainers ever read bug reports BTW?
++
| Alfredo Ferrari
Summary of changes:
3d5001f... Update to 0.13 (*)
de11424... Fedora 17 mass rebuild (*)
7fba86a... Update to 0.14 (*)
f808bda... Update to 0.15 (*)
1e3ce9f... Update to 0.17 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Doesn't matter. The question is whether there is a change in trend. It's
> improbable that KDE adoption is increasing in statistically significant
> numbers, while at the same time KDE spin downloads remain flat, just because
> people can
35 matches
Mail list logo
