Hi all,
due to license change in Ruby, I have updated the license of rubygem-open4
after clarification with its author.
Previous license was GPLv2+ or Ruby, current license is BSD or Ruby.
--
Regards,
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fe
- Original Message -
> On 02/07/2012 07:38 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> ---
> >>
> >> The section of the Packaging Guidelines covering /srv was amended
> >> to
> >> include /opt and /usr/local. Specifically, the following sentence
> >> w
On 02/07/2012 07:38 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hi Tom,
- Original Message -
---
The section of the Packaging Guidelines covering /srv was amended to
include /opt and /usr/local. Specifically, the following sentence was
added:
In addition, no Fedora package can have any files or dir
Hi Tom,
- Original Message -
> ---
>
> The section of the Packaging Guidelines covering /srv was amended to
> include /opt and /usr/local. Specifically, the following sentence was
> added:
>
> In addition, no Fedora package can have any files or directories
> under /opt or /usr/local
Hi,
In our efforts to push DNSSEC to the enduser, we have packaged our
initial DNSSEC reconfiguration utility.
Basically, this makes it possible to use DNSSEC on your laptop, while
moving between networks of which some are "friendly" man in the middle
attacks on DNS via hotspots and sign-ons. Som
On 02/06/2012 08:44 PM, Andy Grimm wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
As stated eariler, the following packages have been retired in F-17 (and
therefore rawhide), due to either failing to build, or not having maintainers.
...
junit4
...
Whoa there.. .this one wasn'
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> As stated eariler, the following packages have been retired in F-17 (and
> therefore rawhide), due to either failing to build, or not having maintainers.
>
> ...
> junit4
> ...
Whoa there.. .this one wasn't in any of the previous emails...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787888
Kurt Seifried changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787888
Kurt Seifried changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787888
Kurt Seifried changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 04:54:01PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 23:19 +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > On 02/06/2012 10:40 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> > > In Fedora 16 we changed to using GPT as the default disklabel for new
> > > installs. In a few cases, mostly limited to L
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 23:19 +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 02/06/2012 10:40 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> > In Fedora 16 we changed to using GPT as the default disklabel for new
> > installs. In a few cases, mostly limited to Lenovo hardware, we found
> > that some BIOS's would not boot from GPT. We
On 02/06/2012 04:41 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
>
> In the new scheme, glibc packages will be based on stable releases,
> with bug-fixes back-ported as necessary. I'll throw out a huge thank
> you to Jeff Law for being willing to step up and take over maintenance
> of the glibc packages in Fedora,
On 02/06/2012 10:40 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> In Fedora 16 we changed to using GPT as the default disklabel for new
> installs. In a few cases, mostly limited to Lenovo hardware, we found
> that some BIOS's would not boot from GPT. We blacklisted Lenovo, falling
> back to msdos labels in order to
On Feb 6, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
>
> In anaconda-17.6 I have reverted the Lenovo blacklist and changed things
> so that pmbr_boot is always set on GPT labeled installs. This should
> ensure that thing boot correctly.
Is this happening only for Lenovo hardware? Or all hardware? I
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Renaming current "Virtualization" to "Virtualization Client" makes sense.
>> I would put new Boxes into both Virt.Client and GNOME groups, list of
>> packages are not exclusive.
>
> Got a patch for this?
v2 attached, it renames just name,
Hello,
My name is Jamie Nguyen. I'm a student in the UK and part-time Linux
system administrator.
I am an active contributer to the TOMOYO Linux security project [1]
and provide a binary repository containing RPMS/SRPMS for TOMOYO Linux
kernels for Enterprise Linux 6 and Fedora 16 [2]. I also hav
In Fedora 16 we changed to using GPT as the default disklabel for new
installs. In a few cases, mostly limited to Lenovo hardware, we found
that some BIOS's would not boot from GPT. We blacklisted Lenovo, falling
back to msdos labels in order to solve this.
Thanks to Matthew Garrett we found that
On Feb 6, 2012, at 5:30 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
>
> retro computing? Maintaining access to pre-historic data?
The only suggestion is dropping the ability to *create* HFS volumes using
hfsplus-tools. Not dropping read support for existing HFS volumes.
> But, no, HFS isn't really dead. Old formats
Hi All,
This was a side project of mine for some time, and I just ported it to
DS 389. It basically parses the dse.ldif into a readable format. It
groups all the backend info together. So each backend lists its own
indexes, config, replication info, etc. It checks for non default
config s
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 18:02 +0100, Jarosław Górny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wiadomość napisana w dniu 2012-02-06, o godz. 17:55, przez Reindl
> Harald:
> >> in your arguments if you have any.
> >
> > why do you not read the arguments?
> >
> > * a new user does not know anything about the menu
> > * a new
As stated eariler, the following packages have been retired in F-17 (and
therefore rawhide), due to either failing to build, or not having maintainers.
adaptx
ario
asa
autodafe
avant-window-navigator
avl
awn-extras-applets
bit
blam
camstream
ccsm
compiz
compiz-bcop
compizconfig-backend-gconf
compi
On 02/06/2012 02:01 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 02/06/2012 11:58 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
grubby, and something would have to provide a systemd service. Here's the
basic algorithm:
1) kernel's %post/%posttrans adds the new stanza using new-kernel-package/
grubby, but doesn't make the new ker
About a year ago Harald had a talk about a "smart initrd" /
"integrated rescue mode" along similar lines. Is this still under
development?
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-02-06)
===
Meeting started by mjg59 at 18:00:24 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-02-06/fesco.2012-02-06-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On 02/06/2012 11:58 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
grubby, and something would have to provide a systemd service. Here's the
basic algorithm:
1) kernel's %post/%posttrans adds the new stanza using new-kernel-package/
grubby, but doesn't make the new kernel default.
2) kernel's %post saves new ker
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/175
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/175/0001-Ticket-175-logconv.pl-improvements.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/175
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/175/0001-Ticket-175-logconv.pl-improvements.patch
There might be another duplicate email coming through. Having mail server
issues(again)...
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.
Am 06.02.2012 18:02, schrieb Jarosław Górny:
> Hi,
>
> Wiadomość napisana w dniu 2012-02-06, o godz. 17:55, przez Reindl Harald:
>>> in your arguments if you have any.
>>
>> why do you not read the arguments?
>>
>> * a new user does not know anything about the menu
>> * a new user fall into a bo
On 02/06/2012 10:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> it is a GENERAL discussion affecting fedora too and was
> introduced in CentOS from fedora
If Fedora users are affected, . be more direct. CentOS or RHEL
discussions here are not appropriate.
> why do you not read the arguments?
Because it was mix
Hi,
Wiadomość napisana w dniu 2012-02-06, o godz. 17:55, przez Reindl
Harald:
in your arguments if you have any.
why do you not read the arguments?
* a new user does not know anything about the menu
* a new user fall into a boot problem after update
If we are considering such a newbie us
On 02/06/2012 11:40 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 05:25:08PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
and why are there so many noobs with questions like "after a kernel
update my machine does no longer boot" if this decision would
be
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 05:50:59PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 06.02.2012 17:44, schrieb Petr Šabata:
> > I am completely happy with a hidden menu and if it wasn't like that by
> > default,
> > I'd just change my grub settings. That's my opinion and taste, different
> > from
> > yours
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 11:40:28AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > The solution to "My kernel update doesn't boot" should be "Automatically
> > detect that that happened, give the user that information and fall back
> > to the old kernel", not
Am 06.02.2012 17:42, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> On 02/06/2012 10:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> it is a "Fedora development" discussion and no there is not
>> a bugreport the right answer because it is a WRONG desicion
>> made in Fedora some releases ago to hide the boot-menu
>
> why a CentOS
Am 06.02.2012 17:44, schrieb Petr Šabata:
> I am completely happy with a hidden menu and if it wasn't like that by
> default,
> I'd just change my grub settings. That's my opinion and taste, different from
> yours. Ha.
no problem, configure it
the new user does know nothing about it!
> Teach
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 05:38:51PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 06.02.2012 17:35, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> > On 02/06/2012 10:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> it was refreshed for me with the question below
> >> without such idiotic changes this sort of problems
> >> would simp
On 02/06/2012 10:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> it is a "Fedora development" discussion and no there is not
> a bugreport the right answer because it is a WRONG desicion
> made in Fedora some releases ago to hide the boot-menu
why a CentOS user wants to boot into a alternative kernel is not a
Fedo
Am 06.02.2012 17:37, schrieb Michael Cronenworth:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> it was refreshed for me with the question below
>> without such idiotic changes this sort of problems
>> would simply not exist and people would learn to
>> use their OS instead obfuscate all options from
>> the users lik
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 05:25:08PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> and why are there so many noobs with questions like "after a kernel
>> update my machine does no longer boot" if this decision would
>> be smart?
>
> The solution to "My ke
Am 06.02.2012 17:35, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> On 02/06/2012 10:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>>
>> it was refreshed for me with the question below
>> without such idiotic changes this sort of problems
>> would simply not exist and people would learn to
>> use their OS instead obfuscate all opti
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 10:51:37AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
>
>> We're running close to the wire on this but it looks like Chris will
>> have fsck out for btrfs tomorrow, so I'd like to get fesco's opinion
>> on the viability of moving for
On 02/06/2012 09:25 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 10:51:37AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
>
>> We're running close to the wire on this but it looks like Chris will
>> have fsck out for btrfs tomorrow, so I'd like to get fesco's opinion
>> on the viability of moving forward with
Reindl Harald wrote:
it was refreshed for me with the question below
without such idiotic changes this sort of problems
would simply not exist and people would learn to
use their OS instead obfuscate all options from
the users like windows
what does this user if he has no other computer
for his
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 05:25:08PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> and why are there so many noobs with questions like "after a kernel
> update my machine does no longer boot" if this decision would
> be smart?
The solution to "My kernel update doesn't boot" should be "Automatically
detect that th
On 02/06/2012 10:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> it was refreshed for me with the question below
> without such idiotic changes this sort of problems
> would simply not exist and people would learn to
> use their OS instead obfuscate all options from
> the users like windows
>
> what does this u
Am 06.02.2012 17:25, schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 17:22:52 +0100,
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> GRUB2 menu is shown in F16. This is a regression compared to F10÷15.
>>> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757487 and linked
>>> bugs #737339 and #727831.
>>
>> t
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 17:22:52 +0100,
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> > GRUB2 menu is shown in F16. This is a regression compared to F10÷15.
> > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757487 and linked
> > bugs #737339 and #727831.
>
> this is a behavior that should never been changed!
So
Am 06.02.2012 17:16, schrieb drago01:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 06.02.2012 15:07, schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
>>> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 02:55:38PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
who decided that it is a good idea to hide the grub-menu?
>>>
>>> It was F10 fe
There have been quite a few approved changes to the Fedora Packaging
Guidelines since the previous announcement, but this is mostly because I
have not had time to actually apply the approved updates to the wiki
until recently. These updates actually were approved over a period of
several months. I
Hi,
with evolution-data-server 3.3.5 release is also bumped soname version
for libcamel. I realized just now, when building eds for rawhide.
Bye,
Milan
___
devel-announce mailing list
devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:/
PIDA, in f16 and beyond, has broken deps:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754673
So to fix this, I need to update to the latest upstream:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651853
But this release need python-flatland and pygtkhelpers. I got
python-flatland into Fedora.
pyg
Am 06.02.2012 17:10, schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 03:16:40PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 06.02.2012 15:07, schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
>>> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 02:55:38PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
who decided that it is a good idea to hide the grub-menu?
>>>
>>>
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 06.02.2012 15:07, schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
>> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 02:55:38PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> who decided that it is a good idea to hide the grub-menu?
>>
>> It was F10 feature: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Bet
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 03:16:40PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 06.02.2012 15:07, schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 02:55:38PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> who decided that it is a good idea to hide the grub-menu?
> >
> > It was F10 feature: http://fedoraproject.org/w
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 10:51:37AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> We're running close to the wire on this but it looks like Chris will
> have fsck out for btrfs tomorrow, so I'd like to get fesco's opinion
> on the viability of moving forward with the Btrfs as default feature,
> whether we actually w
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting tomorrow at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
> Links to all tickets below can be found at:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.10.rc1. No new features were added between alpha 8 and
rc1, just many bug fixes. There are also 389-adminutil, 389-admin, and
389-dsgw packages in Testing.
NEW: EL6 support
Beginning with RHEL 6.2, the 389-ds-base pa
A friendly reminder as we move towards a miraculous, beefy release:
* Feature freeze is tomorrow, February 7, 2012. At this point, all
accepted features should be substantially complete, and testable.
Additionally, if a feature is to be enabled by default, it must be so
enabled at Feature Fre
Hi all,
Ruby 1.9.3 has finally made it into Rawhide, there are still few more packages
that need to be built, but otherwise the transitions was successful.
Please note again, that soname has been bumped to 1.9.1 and license is changed
from GPLv2 or Ruby to BSD or Ruby, as already announced.
--
Hi Pavel,
Ok :-)
On Feb 5, 2012 8:16 PM, "Pavel Alexeev" wrote:
> Hello, Nikos.
>
> I'm ready swap to httpd-itk package -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860
>
> 04.02.2012 00:42, Nikos Roussos wrote:
>
> I'd like a review about sparkleshare package:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #690 F17 Feature: move all to /usr -
Am 06.02.2012 15:07, schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 02:55:38PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> who decided that it is a good idea to hide the grub-menu?
>
> It was F10 feature: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterStartup
> I believe showing GRUB2 menu is a regression whi
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 01:22:14PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> [libguestfs]
[...]
This should be fixed by the current build going through Koji at the
moment.
> [ocaml-augeas]
Needs upstream attention still.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rj
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 02:55:38PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> who decided that it is a good idea to hide the grub-menu?
It was F10 feature: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterStartup
I believe showing GRUB2 menu is a regression which will be
fixed before F17 release.
--
Tomasz Tor
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:10 PM, darrell pfeifer wrote:
>> If you continue to repeat the "eating babies" myth then it will become
>> self-fulfilling.
>
> I would humbly suggest that use of future tense is that sentence is
> overly optimistic an
hi
who decided that it is a good idea to hide the grub-menu?
most questions on mailing-lists and boards is "how can
i boot a different kernel" and it makes really really tired
to see that no new user is realizing that Fedora has a boot
manager
this results a) in needless questions and b) new use
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 06:11 -0500, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> 2012/2/6 Michał Piotrowski :
> > I noticed that F17 is based on the latest stable glibc realease.
> > Previously development Fedora version was based on development glibc.
> > Was there a change of some Fedora glibc policy? If it is no
> >
Think MOL? I've never used it, but I would hate to block its use on
Fedora. I'm planning to use it someday.
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:45 PM, John Reiser wrote:
>
>>> Does anyone object [to dropping support for HFS]?
>>
>> Plain HFS has no journ
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> I need help adding systemd support into xrdp.
>
> someone can take a look and tell me what is wrong ?
Are you seeing any actual problems with the service?
I have not tried to run the service, but here's what comes
to mind:
- It is pointless to declare both
in A:
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2012, at 12:06 PM, John Reiser wrote:
>
>> Examining with gparted and Disk Utility, I see an Apple partition label
>> that designates partitions:
>>
>> HFS (not plus) 1 MB boot
>> HFS+ journalled 25.6 GB Machintosh HD
>>
2012/2/6 Michał Piotrowski :
> I noticed that F17 is based on the latest stable glibc realease.
> Previously development Fedora version was based on development glibc.
> Was there a change of some Fedora glibc policy? If it is no
> coincidence, but the new policy - many thanks for the change :)
Ye
On 06/02/12 09:27, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that F17 is based on the latest stable glibc realease.
Previously development Fedora version was based on development glibc.
I'm guessing Branched in a couple of days, would need some stability.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy, friend of fe
Hi,
I noticed that F17 is based on the latest stable glibc realease.
Previously development Fedora version was based on development glibc.
Was there a change of some Fedora glibc policy? If it is no
coincidence, but the new policy - many thanks for the change :)
--
Best regards,
Michal
http://e
74 matches
Mail list logo
