It appears that when tagging in the f17 rebuild packages, packages built after
the rebuild package but before they got tagged in to f17 are not in current
rawhide. This in particular hit a bunch of packages rebuilt for octave 3.6.0
koji untag-pkg f17
seems to do the trick.
--
Orion Poplawsk
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:05:36PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Once that is done, then just adding the vala bindings to the
> devel-package likely takes less disk space for those who
> do install them, then the meta data needed for a separate subpackage,
> and that metadata needs to be downloaded
* Ralf Corsepius [17/01/2012 20:34] :
>
> It's not uncommon to Fedora users to confronted with /dev/null style
> answers. It's just that they are called "FIXED RAWHIDE", "FIXED
> UPSTREAM" or "no reply" and not explicitly labeled "/dev/null" ;)
Nitpick: There is no status "FIXED" in Fedora's bug
Hi,
On 01/17/2012 04:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 02:16:19PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/17/2012 02:08 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I disagree. Like other "exotic languages", anything related to i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/17/2012 03:48 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> Daniel, can you point me to some docs on how to do this?
>
>
If you want to allow it for now you could build a custom policy
# grep mongod /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M mongod
# semodu
Daniel, can you point me to some docs on how to do this?
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/17/2012 02:12 PM, Jon VanAlten wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> From: "Nathaniel McCallum" To:
> >> "De
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/17/2012 02:12 PM, Jon VanAlten wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Nathaniel McCallum" To:
>> "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012
>> 1:24:25 PM Subject: Testing needed (mongodb)
>>
>
On 01/17/2012 02:23 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Good catch! However, I'm not sure what the best way to fix this is. Any
SELinux folk care to comment?
FWIW:
https://github.com/mongodb/mongo/commit/8521b85b0e4447db8c5da6f0db249901608cc874
So leaving it as it is may not be too bad. But I woul
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Jon VanAlten wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Nathaniel McCallum"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:24:25 PM
> > Subject: Testing needed (mongodb)
> >
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Nathaniel McCallum"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:24:25 PM
> Subject: Testing needed (mongodb)
>
> I've built packages of MongoDB 2.0.2 for f15, f16 and f17. This
> should be a
> drop in replacemen
commit 625fd3ae2a5f9d74fa9a702fd25cd95e0371d237
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet
Date: Tue Jan 17 11:51:26 2012 -0700
Enable systemd PrivateTmp feature
dspam-systemd |1 +
dspam.spec|5 -
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/dspam-systemd b/dspam-sy
The lightweight tag 'perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope-0.09-1.fc17' was created pointing
to:
38a976e... Update to 0.09
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/pe
On 01/17/2012 06:31 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Well, you leave me no other choice but to pronounce something you
probably don't want to hear:
It's not uncommon to Fedora users to confronted with /dev/null style
answers. It's just that they are called "FIXED RAWHIDE", "FIXED
UPSTREAM" or "no
On 01/17/2012 05:26 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:54:39 -0500, SG (Stephen) wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 02:21 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
While that makes some sense, it was not my point. My point was that even if
the package has NO maintainer, as long as it works, it's st
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Emmanuel Seyman
wrote:
> * Christophe Fergeau [17/01/2012 19:16] :
>>
>> By that reasoning, shouldn't we also fold python bindings in the -devel
>> package? They are small, python is already implicitly installed, so this
>> should be fine too.
>
> This is going to
I've built packages of MongoDB 2.0.2 for f15, f16 and f17. This should be a
drop in replacement for your 1.8.x server. See
http://www.mongodb.org/display/DOCS/2.0+Release+Notes#2.0ReleaseNotes-Upgradingfor
further details.
However, I had to rewrite the patch providing js 1.8.5 support. So I'd like
* Christophe Fergeau [17/01/2012 19:16] :
>
> By that reasoning, shouldn't we also fold python bindings in the -devel
> package? They are small, python is already implicitly installed, so this
> should be fine too.
This is going to make things harder for spins and Fedora-based distributions
who mi
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope:
83d941d374d6718cdd5c2721c40f660f B-Hooks-EndOfScope-0.09.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
commit 7f17a170f084d77e37c5825ceb94fa05da649f4f
Author: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Tue Jan 17 17:52:26 2012 +0100
BR: and use /usr/bin/perldoc (Fix mass rebuild FTBFS).
perl-X11-Protocol.spec | 10 +++---
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-X11-Protocol.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 04:55:10PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
>> wrote:
>> > I agree with Ralf. Vala files are meaningless except for people who
>> > care about vala, so they
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 04:55:10PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > More to the point, presumably if the vala files were included in
> > *-devel, they'd also cause an explicit or implicit dependency on
> > vala-devel, which would mean
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 02:25:08PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 14:16 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > users who have no use for vala.
>
> Are users having no use of vala really installing -devel packages or
> vala program ?
spice-gtk is a C library shipping C headers
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:54:39 -0500, SG (Stephen) wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 02:21 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > While that makes some sense, it was not my point. My point was that even if
> > the package has NO maintainer, as long as it works, it's still better than
> > no package at all!
>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 04:55:10PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I agree with Ralf. Vala files are meaningless except for people who
> > care about vala, so they should go in a subpackage.
>
> So is gobject-introspection then. No
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/17/2012 04:01 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> No, it really should use the system version. If it's not in
> Fedora, submit it as a review for a new package.
>
> -J
>
If I read correctly there is no system version since the code
discussed is not a lib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781405
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> Hello.
>
> We have forbidden bundle libs.
> But what status if from one project copied some source files into another
> and it is not lib to link it?
>
> I work under packaging new version of qutim [1] which is under GPLv3+ and
> CC-BY-SA and
Hello.
We have forbidden bundle libs.
But what status if from one project copied some source files into
another and it is not lib to link it?
I work under packaging new version of qutim [1] which is under GPLv3+
and CC-BY-SA and author copied few files to work with rtf format from
fbreader [
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I agree with Ralf. Vala files are meaningless except for people who
> care about vala, so they should go in a subpackage.
So is gobject-introspection then. Not everybody care about it, or
systemtap, gdb python macros, valgrind..
Furth
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 02:16:19PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/17/2012 02:08 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> >Hi
> >
> >On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >>I disagree. Like other "exotic languages", anything related to it should
> >>remain "strictly optional".
> >Un
commit 663483da5cd573679bd99bde2e606afa315b20f6
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Tue Jan 17 16:14:53 2012 +0100
Correct release
perl-POE-Component-Logger.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-POE-Component-Logger.spec b/perl-POE-Component-Logger.s
commit b2b7cc5ff754f1f8b6b6b09f5f14b56b2dd5fe22
Author: Petr Šabata
Date: Tue Jan 17 16:09:40 2012 +0100
1.10 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-POE-Component-Logger.spec | 39 +++
sources|2 +-
3 files chan
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-POE-Component-Logger:
74f265d378bc65881bf510a8d9110eb6 POE-Component-Logger-1.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedor
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 02:21 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> While that makes some sense, it was not my point. My point was that even if
> the package has NO maintainer, as long as it works, it's still better than
> no package at all!
Not true. A package that appears to work, has people using it, bu
commit b3fa6bcdd5b2eaecb425801f7cdfe06f6d0b1d08
Author: Nicolas Chauvet
Date: Tue Jan 17 14:42:59 2012 +0100
Add new BR
perl-Devel-Refcount.spec |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Devel-Refcount.spec b/perl-Devel-Refcount.spec
index 6f26cdc.
On 01/17/2012 01:21 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
While that makes some sense, it was not my point. My point was that even if
the package has NO maintainer, as long as it works, it's still better than
no package at all!
I disagree packages without maintainers should not be shipped in the
distributio
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 14:25 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 14:16 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > users who have no use for vala.
>
> Are users having no use of vala really installing -devel packages or
> vala program ?
Err, I meant "-devel package of vala program"
Pier
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 14:16 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> users who have no use for vala.
Are users having no use of vala really installing -devel packages or
vala program ?
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 01/17/2012 02:08 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I disagree. Like other "exotic languages", anything related to it should
remain "strictly optional".
Unlike other bindings which are binaries and link or require external
packages, vapi
Hi
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> I disagree. Like other "exotic languages", anything related to it should
> remain "strictly optional".
Unlike other bindings which are binaries and link or require external
packages, vapi files are small plain text file that can be use
Hi,
On 01/16/2012 11:21 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Eitherway I think we need some (minimalistic) guidelines on
howto package vala bindings so that we can do this consistently
and with proper directory ownership.
Note that the bindings
41 matches
Mail list logo
