Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> We talked about, but never finished implementing a timeout on acl
> requests.
>
> The way this would work is that maintainer would have some time.. 3
> weeks or something to reject a acl request. If they did not do so,
> pkgdb would automatically approve it at the end of the t
Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> I also prefer the vapi files are part of the -devel package, that
> reduces the number of packages & depedency, and it's not worth the
> split for a few kb.
I think that consistency, also with other language bindings, is worth the
extra subpackage(s). And it would allow
Brendan Jones wrote:
> I agree! If a package is orphaned, can't we automatically escalate
> ownership to the next co-maintainer (when there is one - perhaps the one
> with the most commits for example).
>
> If a package is being orphaned for legitimate reasons, the owner should
> announce the inte
Mattia Verga wrote:
> For the second point, I don't know if a new review should be really
> necessary only to verify the presence of "obsoletes and provides": in my
> opinion if someone is a package maintainer he/she MUST already know how
> to rename a package and that this requires "obsoletes and
Richard Shaw writes:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>>> I've gone through the CMakeLists.txt and added "add_dependencies(..."
>>> but I think that's redundant because target_link_libraries is getting
>>> set properly.
>>
>> I'm not sure this is red
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-01-16)
===
Meeting started by mitr at 18:00:06 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-01-16/fesco.2012-01-16-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
> > what about looking at existing ones?
> > no,, it takes some minutes for 90% of all services
> >
> > If you believe so, file patches
>
> well, attached are the one i am using with F15
> most of them written by myself or derived
> from F16/F17 packages
>
> CAUTION: they are from mixed
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 05:01:29 +0100
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/16/2012 03:20 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:28:15 +0100
> > Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >
> >> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >>> However, with the current features of pkgdb, each member of such a
> >>> group would need to
Yes, with skychart I made some confusion: after a discussion on a forum
I thought I can use a request for updating a package as a review ticket,
but I soon realize that this wasn't possible. So I became a maintainer
in the correct way and after that I asked privileges in pkgdb to become
a co-ma
Timing could have been better. But the workflow I'm going to work towards is
the have fedpkg retire handle got and pkgdb then have pkgdb handle the koji
side. With the end result being that you just do 1 thing.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Iain Arnell
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> list of Perl packages which are orphaned in rawhide follows (101 now). Feel
> free to grab them. F17 branching from rawhide is planned to 2012-02-07. I will
> be sending updated list regularly to the begining of February. Then I will
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> One thing that became clear during the mass rebuild is that people are
> not following the proper procedure to retire packages
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
> lists the current process. I have some
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:53:11 -0600,
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> The Bulk of the mass rebuild is done and will shortly be tagged into
> f17 http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f17-failures.html is a list of the
> packages that failed to build. im working on double checking that we
> attempted every
El Wed, 4 Jan 2012 11:27:45 -0600
Dennis Gilmore escribió:
> starting immediatly there is going to be a mass rebuild of rawhide
> for gcc-4.7 that landed yesterday.
>
> as approved by FESCo (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/739)
> packagers will have just over a week, until Thursday Jan 12 t
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:48:53 -0500,
Julio Merino wrote:
>
> I don't think any of these gives package maintainer permissions.
> (But also, I can't remember if I ever had those before!)
You got sponsored as a result of this ticket:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453821
You appe
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:46:13 -0500, JM (Julio) wrote:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO
>
> I actually had read that (although it was non-trivial to reach).
> However, this document assumes you already are a maintainer with access
> to the repository and build systems. Wha
On 1/15/12 11:20 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 20:08:20 -0500,
Julio Merino wrote:
Also, I cannot tell if three years ago I gained some privileges that
I have now lost due to the conversion of the packages repository
from cvs to git. For example, a "fedpkg clone" witho
On 1/15/12 11:20 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Julio Merino wrote:
Also, I cannot tell if three years ago I gained some privileges that I
have now lost due to the conversion of the packages repository from cvs
to git. For example, a "fedpkg clone" without the -a option fails due
to a permission denied
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:47:46AM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> On 01/13/2012 02:55 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > ocaml-perl4caml
> >
> > - Some sort of Perl bug or change which I'm not quite sure about.
> >
> The scratch build is now working fine. Maybe rebuild of perl
> dependencies f
2012/1/15 Miloslav Trmač :
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting tomorrow at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.freenode.net.
One more thing that may be added to the agenda if there is enough time left:
#topic #724 sponsor request - sdak
I've been fixing a few of my packages which FTBFS in the grand
rebuild. A common theme I'm seeing is packages that need
/usr/bin/perldoc which (a) is no longer included in the base package
set and (b) is no longer included in the base 'perl' package.
I suspect that (a) happened because of (b).
A
On 01/16/2012 11:21 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Eitherway I think we need some (minimalistic) guidelines on
howto package vala bindings so that we can do this consistently
and with proper directory ownership.
Note that the bindings provi
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Eitherway I think we need some (minimalistic) guidelines on
> howto package vala bindings so that we can do this consistently
> and with proper directory ownership.
Note that the bindings provided by vala itself are installed in its
own dir
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 14:44 -0500, Trever Fischer wrote:
> Greetings from FUDCon, in Blacksburg, VA.
>
> I know that only a handful of people might recognize me on devel@, but
> something that's been rolling around in my head for a little while is to
> start a Multimedia SIG in fedora.
>
> I know
Hi,
More and more packages are getting / installing vala bindings.
While adding vala bindings to the spice-gtk package I've noticed
that there are some issues / inconsistencies with how vala bindings
are packaged:
1) Some packages put them in their regular -devel, others in a separate
-vala
2)
On 01/13/2012 02:55 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> OK I've done all but a handful that have proper errors:
>
> ocaml-augeas
>
> - New depends on libxml2 and detection of the header
>file breaks. Needs upstream fix.
>
> ocaml-perl4caml
>
> - Some sort of Perl bug or change which I'm
Hi,
Octave 3.6.0 was released yesterday, so I'm updating the rawhide branch
to 3.6.0. This causes an API bump, causing the need to rebuild all
octave related packages.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
27 matches
Mail list logo
