On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 20:08:20 -0500,
Julio Merino wrote:
>
> Also, I cannot tell if three years ago I gained some privileges that
> I have now lost due to the conversion of the packages repository
> from cvs to git. For example, a "fedpkg clone" without the -a
> option fails due to a permis
Julio Merino wrote:
> Also, I cannot tell if three years ago I gained some privileges that I
> have now lost due to the conversion of the packages repository from cvs
> to git. For example, a "fedpkg clone" without the -a option fails due
> to a permission denied (reason: publickey), although I h
On 01/16/2012 03:20 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:28:15 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
However, with the current features of pkgdb, each member of such a
group would need to "subscribe to" the package in pkgdb. Not just
for "commit" access, but also for some
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:37:16 +0100
Mattia Verga wrote:
> I'm just entered the world of Fedora packagers and I see a few points
> that can be optimized in my opinion.
Welcome by the way. ;)
> 1. I saw a package that need to be upgraded. I opened a bug in
> bugzilla, after some time whit no res
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:39:48 +0100
Michael J Gruber wrote:
...snip...
(Please trim you emails...)
> Took bibexport.
>
> mathmap seems to be dead upstream as a Gimp plugin, unfortunately.
> (It's supposed to be turned into a web service...)
>
> While it's a pitty to see it go away, pampering t
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:28:15 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > However, with the current features of pkgdb, each member of such a
> > group would need to "subscribe to" the package in pkgdb. Not just
> > for "commit" access, but also for someone to monitor bugzilla and
> > t
Hello,
About three years ago, I created two very simple packages: mk-files and
bmake. I followed the instructions at that time to get them into the
distribution, and the packages were accepted. For a variety of reasons,
I had not been paying attention to those packages since then, but other
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:37:16 +0100, MV (Mattia) wrote:
> I'm just entered the world of Fedora packagers and I see a few points
> that can be optimized in my opinion.
>
> 1. I saw a package that need to be upgraded. I opened a bug in bugzilla,
> after some time whit no response from the maintain
I'm just entered the world of Fedora packagers and I see a few points
that can be optimized in my opinion.
1. I saw a package that need to be upgraded. I opened a bug in bugzilla,
after some time whit no response from the maintainer I asked in pkgdb
permissions for that package: I'm still wait
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
None
= New business =
#topic #742 F17 Feat
Bill Nottingham venit, vidit, dixit 13.01.2012 17:11:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 17.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 15.
>
> The following pac
I took teseq.
15.01.2012 14:28, Vivek Shah wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have had no time for the past months to look after my packages so I am
orphaning them.
t
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:48:35 +0100,
> Brendan Jones wrote:
>> On 01/14/2012 07:12 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> I agree! If a package is orphaned, can't we automatically escalate
>> ownership to the next co-maintainer (when there is one
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:48:35 +0100,
Brendan Jones wrote:
> On 01/14/2012 07:12 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I agree! If a package is orphaned, can't we automatically escalate
> ownership to the next co-maintainer (when there is one - perhaps the
> one with the most commits for example).
>
> If
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2012-01-16
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again, now we're ramping up towards Alpha, and the
four of us who are at FUDCon wil
With a little sadless I has to orhan avant-windows-navigator,
awn-extras-applet and libdesktop-agnostic for fedora-devel (fedora-17)
The avant-windows-navigator package don't build in rawhide because of
changes in latest version of vala
The awn-extras-applet has lot of problems with gnome 2.x depe
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:28:10 +0100, VS (Vivek) wrote:
>I have had no time for the past months to look after my packages so I am
> orphaning them.
>
> teseq, mausezahn,samefile.
I've taken "samefile".
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
On 01/14/2012 07:12 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Keeping packages around with no maintainers or people handling their
bugs is poor for everyone.
Why? If I, as a user, really need a certain piece of software, I'd rather
have an unmaintained package than none at all! Worst case, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have had no time for the past months to look after my packages so I am
orphaning them.
teseq, mausezahn,samefile.
I have been steadily orpha
19 matches
Mail list logo
