On 2012-01-05 03:25, Reindl Harald wrote:
> why in the world introducing updates the installation
> of devel-packages?
Packaging bugs, in this case https://bugzilla.redhat.com/748362 .
Looks like I didn't end up in Cc for that bug so I've missed the mail
for comment 4, but I'll look into pushing t
why in the world introducing updates the installation
of devel-packages?
yum remove mod_perl-devel-2.0.5-1.fc15.x86_64
would remove "mod_perl" and all it's dependencies
yum remove httpd-devel
would remove "mod_perl" and all it's dependencies
yum remove apr-util-devel
would remove "httpd-devel" w
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 03:09:07PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
>> I suppose I have to go to the gnome lists and raise Cain about this
>> kind of fundamental mis-engineering?
>
> If you want bugs to be fixed, then please file bugreports.
I'm wonde
On 12/31/2011 12:56 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
As part of preparations to switch GCC in F17 to GCC 4.7.0, I've performed
a test mass rebuild of rawhide (December 23th package list) using
gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17 on x86_64, and for those packages that failed also
rebuilt the same package with gcc-4.6
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> Once you do a first Rawhide build I do not know how to revert it.
Untag all the Rawhide builds with koji untag-pkg f17 NVR.
Be warned that rel-eng is going to yell at you if you do this without
ensuring that the EVR inherited from F16 is newer. FESCo decided that EVRs
ar
David Howells wrote:
> (1) As each set of cross-binutils manual pages is the same as every other
> set
> (and the core set come to that), I've stuffed the base manual pages
> in their own RPM and put symlinks to them from the individual arch
> RPMs.
>
> However, this results
Am 04.01.2012 22:02, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 13:14 +, mike cloaked wrote:
>
>> If the Gnome decision is for tracker to be there by default then that
>> is a Gnome dev decision, and Gnome users can switch it off if they
>> know how to and want to do so - but why was the
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 13:14 +, mike cloaked wrote:
> If the Gnome decision is for tracker to be there by default then that
> is a Gnome dev decision, and Gnome users can switch it off if they
> know how to and want to do so - but why was the decision made to set
> it up and running for other d
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:22:21PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On 2012-01-03 16:07, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> >
> > If you never do a build in Rawhide - your latest build is the F16 one
> > - Rawhide automatically inherits the F16 (or older) builds.
> > I find it useful.
>
> Me too, but beware, so
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, David Howells wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've produced a pair of specfiles that I'm aiming to get into Fedora that take
> the standard Fedora binutils and gcc SRPM sources and patches and produce a
> series of cross-compilation binutils and gcc RPMs for all the Linux kernel
On 2012-01-03 16:07, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>
> If you never do a build in Rawhide - your latest build is the F16 one
> - Rawhide automatically inherits the F16 (or older) builds.
> I find it useful.
Me too, but beware, sometimes the inheritance is explicitly disabled.
http://lists.fedoraproject.o
Hi,
I've produced a pair of specfiles that I'm aiming to get into Fedora that take
the standard Fedora binutils and gcc SRPM sources and patches and produce a
series of cross-compilation binutils and gcc RPMs for all the Linux kernel
arches that I can manage to get working.
The inclusion request
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> Shouldn't fedpkg be calling rpmbuild-md5 -bs when targeting an older
> dist like EL5?
fedpkg's --help text for "local" or "srpm" describes an --md5 option,
and that's what I use when building for EL5.
- Ken
--
devel mailing list
devel@lis
Attempting to build an srpm or do a local mockbuild using fedpkg on an
EL6 buildhost fails with EL5 chroot:
DEBUG util.py:257: error: unpacking of archive failed on file
/builddir/build/SOURCES/0001-10244-Restore-Mongrel-XMLRPC-functionality.patch;4f04a4a9:
cpio: MD5 sum mismatch
I had to build t
I just orphaned mod_evasive. I believe Jan Ondrej is going to pick it
up.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739171
Best regards,
--
Konstantin Ryabitsev
Systems Administrator
The Linux Foundation
Montréal, Québec
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> starting immediatly there is going to be a mass rebuild of rawhide for
> gcc-4.7 that landed yesterday.
>
> as approved by FESCo (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/739)
> packagers will have just over a week, until Thursday Jan 12 to bu
starting immediatly there is going to be a mass rebuild of rawhide for gcc-4.7
that landed yesterday.
as approved by FESCo (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/739)
packagers will have just over a week, until Thursday Jan 12 to build
packages themselves. After that date releng will kick off an
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 03:09:07PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> I suppose I have to go to the gnome lists and raise Cain about this
> kind of fundamental mis-engineering?
If you want bugs to be fixed, then please file bugreports. Tracker
should NOT have a noticeable impact on performance (in the defa
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 09:52 +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
>
>> I think the error here is less in the coding in packages than in the
>> design of the default system specifications, specifically the package
>> selection.
>>
>> The errors gnome has c
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 05:47:11PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> Also, 30 GiB in .cache/tracker is a bit extreme when rest of my ~ is 4 GiB.
Tracker should only index a few standard directories ($HOME without
subdirectories, ~/Documents, etc). What does it index on your machine?
Is that the defau
> Thanks for the pointers.
>
> By running this command, I have signed up for iwhd-related
> notifications in F-16 and rawhide:
>
> ssh fedorapeople.org autoqa-optin iwhd devel F-16
With this command you will subscribe for rpmlint and rpmguard test results for
every new build [1].
Depcheck
On 01/03/2012 05:21 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 11:15 -0500, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 01/03/2012 09:16 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
# cat /proc/meminfo>/tmp/1; killall tracker-store; sleep 1; cat
/proc/meminfo>/tmp/2; cat /tmp/1 /tmp/2 | grep MemFree
MemFree: 1940372 kB
22 matches
Mail list logo
