Re: fedora 16 koji broken

2011-12-20 Thread Elio Maldonado
On 12/20/2011 07:10 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > >> fedora 16 koji broken >> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3596971 >> >> >> DEBUG util.py:307: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/yum', >> '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f16-build-1203861-192685/root/', >>

Re: fedora 16 koji broken

2011-12-20 Thread Rex Dieter
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > fedora 16 koji broken > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3596971 > > > DEBUG util.py:307: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/yum', > '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f16-build-1203861-192685/root/', > 'groupinstall', 'srpm-build'] > DEBUG util.py:257:

fedora 16 koji broken

2011-12-20 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
fedora 16 koji broken http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3596971 DEBUG util.py:307: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/yum', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f16-build-1203861-192685/root/', 'groupinstall', 'srpm-build'] DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: nss-3.13.1-9.fc16.i686 (buil

Self introduction

2011-12-20 Thread Mattia Verga
Hi all, my name is Mattia Verga, I live in Italy, and even if I don't work in the IT sector (I work for a telephone company) I would be glad to become a Fedora contributor. My experience in Fedora started with Fedora Core 1 (even before I occasionally used Red Hat) and from Fedora Core 3 I comp

Review swaps

2011-12-20 Thread Jerry James
I need reviews for the following: ocaml-dpt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693831 This is used by the theorem prover Isabelle, which I still hope to see in Fedora some day. polybori https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742388 This is a package rename review. The original pack

Sponsorship request to fedora packager group

2011-12-20 Thread Andrea Stagi
Hi all, I'm Andrea Stagi, I work as a developer and in my spare time I work as an open source developer mostly involved in Turpial and Emesene ( https://github.com/4ndreast4gi ). I would like to find someone that would sponsor me, I would like to maintain the Emesene package. I did an unofficial p

Re: Canonical Will Remove Java From Ubuntu

2011-12-20 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 12/20/2011 05:48 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Peter Robinson wrote: Actually that's not entirely correct. They're removing the Sun Java closed source variant due to changes in licensing from Oracle preventing them from shipping security fixes. They also ship OpenJDK which is the open source releas

emesene license change

2011-12-20 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
emesene license changed. -License:GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ +License:GPLv3 -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP) +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM) +55 34 8806 3989 (OI) +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG) -- devel mailing list devel@list

Re: Emesene 2.11.11 package

2011-12-20 Thread Michael Schwendt
http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/emesene shows that there have been two other update requests before, and there are more than a dozen open bug reports. I've closed a couple of dupes. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Canonical Will Remove Java From Ubuntu

2011-12-20 Thread Kevin Kofler
Peter Robinson wrote: > Actually that's not entirely correct. They're removing the Sun Java > closed source variant due to changes in licensing from Oracle > preventing them from shipping security fixes. They also ship OpenJDK > which is the open source release of the Java JDK as shipped in Fedora

Re: Emesene 2.11.11 package

2011-12-20 Thread Andrea Stagi
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Heiko Adams wrote: > Am 20.12.2011 16:21, schrieb Andrea Stagi: >> I see. My package is the version 2.11.11 you're still at the >> 1.6.x, may be not working, we did important modifications this >> year... how can I update Emesene? >> > The normal way would be openi

Re: Emesene 2.11.11 package

2011-12-20 Thread Heiko Adams
Am 20.12.2011 16:21, schrieb Andrea Stagi: > I see. My package is the version 2.11.11 you're still at the > 1.6.x, may be not working, we did important modifications this > year... how can I update Emesene? > The normal way would be opening a bugreport against emense and request an update and mayb

Re: Emesene 2.11.11 package

2011-12-20 Thread Andrea Stagi
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Andrea Stagi wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm Andrea Stagi, I work as a developer and in my spare time I'm an >> open source developer mainly focused on Emesene and Turpial projects ( >> https://github.com/4

Re: Emesene 2.11.11 package

2011-12-20 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Andrea Stagi wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm Andrea Stagi, I work as a developer and in my spare time I'm an > open source developer mainly focused on Emesene and Turpial projects ( > https://github.com/4ndreaSt4gi )... This is the first time I try > Fedora on my PC becau

Emesene 2.11.11 package

2011-12-20 Thread Andrea Stagi
Hi all, I'm Andrea Stagi, I work as a developer and in my spare time I'm an open source developer mainly focused on Emesene and Turpial projects ( https://github.com/4ndreaSt4gi )... This is the first time I try Fedora on my PC because I had a bad experience with lastest Ubuntu versions and Fedora

rawhide report: 20111220 changes

2011-12-20 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue Dec 20 08:15:09 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- OpenGTL-0.9.15.1-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libLLVM-2.9.so()(64bit) OpenGTL-devel-0.9.15.1-3.fc17.i686 requires libLLVM-2.9.so OpenGTL-devel-0.9.15.