Native systemd unit for tsm client

Here's an native tsm client service for your fedora running workstation/server since it's probably going to be awhile before IBM catches up to systemd... ### tsm-client.service ### [Unit] Description=Tivoly Storage Manager Client After=network.target [Service] Type=oneshot Environment=DSM_LOG

Re: [Fedora-music-list] New packages / Fedora Audio

On 12/15/2011 12:44 AM, Brendan Jones wrote: zita-at1-0.2.3-4.fc15 zita-rev1-0.2.1-4.fc15 Brendan Apologies, wrong list. Brendan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [Fedora-music-list] New packages / Fedora Audio

On 12/11/2011 09:43 AM, Simon Lewis wrote: Nice one Brendan, can you push these on fc15 (fc15 still has 5 months of support from fedora)? Regards, Simon The following are in updates testing, the zita-convolver dependency I mentioned, related to another update entirely. zita-at1-0.2.3

A change in Fedora's policy regarding Public Domain

In consultation with Red Hat Legal and the Fedora Board, I have implemented a chance to Fedora's policy regarding software marked as being in the Public Domain. The new policy is as follows: * Works which are clearly marked as being in the Public Domain, and for which no evidence is known to

Re: Re: nss_db

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Mark R Bannister >> > that the nss_db package has been deprecated, and that the new nss_db >> > support in >> > glibc no longer uses Berkeley DB format. >> >> I appreciate your concerns, but unfortunately most of the glibc >> development decisions happen in the u

Re: Re: nss_db

On Wed 14/12/11 13:44 , "Jared K. Smith" jsm...@fedoraproject.org sent: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Mark R Bannister wrote: > I note from this posting: > > > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-July/153665.html> > > > > And this one: > > > > http://sourceware.org/git/?p=gl

Re: nss_db

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > That reminds me that you were talking to the glibc upstream about their > sometimes cavalier attitude to significant changes. How did that go? Did you > get a sense that they understood where we're coming from? My discussion with the gli

Re: nss_db

On 12/14/2011 08:44 AM, Jared K. Smith wrote: I appreciate your concerns, but unfortunately most of the glibc development decisions happen in the upstream glibc community, and we in Fedora don't always have a lot of pull when it comes to those sorts of decisions. That reminds me that you were

Re: Orphaning techtalk-pse

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:21:10PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:29:54AM -0500, Ian Weller wrote: > > I am orphaning the techtalk-pse package because the Gtk2::MozEmbed perl > > module will no longer be maintained in Fedora because gtkmozembed > > support has been re

Re: nss_db

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Mark R Bannister wrote: > I note from this posting: > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-July/153665.html > > And this one: > > http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=2666d441c2d8107b1987b869714189af64b954c6 > > that the nss_db package

Re: Systemd and fstab

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 14:01, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 14.12.11 12:25, Andrew Price (anpr...@redhat.com) wrote: >> From the systemd.mount(5) man page: >> >> "Mount units may either be configured via unit files, or via /etc/fstab" >> >> This makes me wonder - to what extent will system

Re: nss_db

I note from this posting: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-July/153665.html And this one: http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=2666d441c2d8107b1987b869714189af64b954c6 that the nss_db package has been deprecated, and that the new nss_db support in glibc no longer

Re: Systemd and fstab

On Wed, 14.12.11 12:25, Andrew Price (anpr...@redhat.com) wrote: > Hi, > > From the systemd.mount(5) man page: > > "Mount units may either be configured via unit files, or via /etc/fstab" > > This makes me wonder - to what extent will systemd replace fstab in > future Fedoras? Will fstab disapp

[Bug 767571] perl-Dancer-1.3090 is available

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767571 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added ---

Re: Systemd and fstab

On 12/14/2011 07:25 AM, Andrew Price wrote: > Hi, > > From the systemd.mount(5) man page: > > "Mount units may either be configured via unit files, or via /etc/fstab" > > This makes me wonder - to what extent will systemd replace fstab in > future Fedoras? Will fstab disappear in favour of syste

[Bug 767571] perl-Dancer-1.3090 is available

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767571 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added ---

Systemd and fstab

Hi, From the systemd.mount(5) man page: "Mount units may either be configured via unit files, or via /etc/fstab" This makes me wonder - to what extent will systemd replace fstab in future Fedoras? Will fstab disappear in favour of systemd mount units? Andy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.f

rawhide report: 20111214 changes

Compose started at Wed Dec 14 08:16:13 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- OpenGTL-0.9.15.1-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libLLVM-2.9.so()(64bit) OpenGTL-devel-0.9.15.1-3.fc17.i686 requires libLLVM-2.9.so OpenGTL-devel-0.9.15.

Re: libpng mass rebuild status, 2011-12-06

Hi, On 12/06/2011 06:17 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: After yesterday's rebuilds, there remain 271 binary packages from 232 source packages that still require libpng-compat. No FTBFS bugs have been filed at this time. There's a pretty wide variety of failures represented here. In addition to the li