On 12/05/2011 05:09 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 15:41 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
>> I grabbed and extracted just the kmodsrc, all the modules within now
>> build fine. So the new version information is doing the right thing,
>> representing itself as a normal 3.1 kernel internal
Hi,
Weirdly I am seeing that mock (1.1.18 on a rhel 6 machine) is now
deleting the logs if a package rebuilds successfully. The logs are not
deleted if the package fails to complete building. I've looked at the
man page and can't see any option to keep the logs. What am I missing?
TIA,
Jonathan
-
The latest round of Fedora Elections has concluded, and I am pleased
to announce the results for elected seats on the Fedora Board and
FESCo and FAmSCo. The results are as follows:
Fedora Board
---
There were two open seats on the Fedora Board this election cycle. A
total of 224 b
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 15:41 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 12/05/2011 01:05 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Hi, Now I'm co-maintaining VirtualBox on rpmfusion
> > you got on my external link VB 4.1.4 for F15
> > http://www.serjux.com/virtualbox/
> > if you try it let me know ,
>
> I grabbed and extra
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 12:08 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> As you all might know, it is currently impossible to boot the default
> install of F16 on Macs. It does not seem to matter if you use boot
> loaders such as reFit and Bootcamp or remove MacOS completely and try
> to boot. Apparently, if you
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 00:05 +, Aaron Gray wrote:
> Am getting the following :-
>
> Couldn't run /usr/sbin/dumpcap in child process: Permission denied
> Are you a member of the 'wireshark' group? Try running
> 'usermod -a -G wireshark _your_username_' as root.
Did you try, perhaps, running 'us
Orion Poplawski writes:
> I'm seeing the following boost related build error building paraview
> in rawhide. Do any boost gurus know what the issue might be the
> issue?
Hi there, please do not hesitate to file bugs for such regressions. I
only noticed this message today.
The problem here is
Am getting the following :-
Couldn't run /usr/sbin/dumpcap in child process: Permission denied
Are you a member of the 'wireshark' group? Try running
'usermod -a -G wireshark _your_username_' as root.
Aaron
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
On 12/05/2011 01:05 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi, Now I'm co-maintaining VirtualBox on rpmfusion
> you got on my external link VB 4.1.4 for F15
> http://www.serjux.com/virtualbox/
> if you try it let me know ,
I grabbed and extracted just the kmodsrc, all the modules within now
build fine. So th
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Capture-Tiny:
d03f278c448ff7897cd2037e54ab86ee Capture-Tiny-0.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
Hi,
Once in a while comes back the question: "is
around ?"
Normally followed by: "I have opened and pinged him several time on
".
And there the hunt for the last trace of activity starts. Some days ago
someone on the list was asking if there wasn't such a program that would
help identifying if s
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 02:02:27 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> Anyone interested in an or1ksim package for Fedora?
I'm interested and I'm willing to do the package review.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 15:25 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Are you sure your not referring to gdk-pixbuf2?
>
> I really suspect so.
>
> the gdk-pixbuf package is the gtk+ one in fedora.
> it's last release was december 2002.
Yes, gdk-pixbuf2 is not going away.
gdk-pixbuf is the gtk1-era inca
Well, this happens... one thing that would be nice is if folks gave the
rkhunter maintainers (of which I am one) a heads up so we could add it
to the whitelist.
Otherwise we are just reacting when users see it.
In any case, will try and get this updated soon...
kevin
signature.asc
Descriptio
On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 23:17:02 +
Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> > Kevin Fenzi wrote about gdk-pixbuf:
> > > It failed the mass rebuild, not much left that depends on it, and
> > > nothing I need. ;)
> > [...]
> >
> >> So, if anyone really really
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 16:25 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Adam Williamson writes:
> > On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 10:48 -0800, Eric Smith wrote:
> >> 1) Is putting the icon into /usr/share/pixmap OK?
>
> > Not really. That dir is obsolescent, effectively. I'm not sure if we'll
> > ever manage to throw it
Adam Williamson writes:
> On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 10:48 -0800, Eric Smith wrote:
>> 1) Is putting the icon into /usr/share/pixmap OK?
> Not really. That dir is obsolescent, effectively. I'm not sure if we'll
> ever manage to throw it away, but if you have the opportunity to control
> icon deploy
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 19:16 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 10:49:39AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 17:54 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 06:19:27PM +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes, and the question become
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 11:32 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 12:47 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:06:32 -0800
> > Josh Stone wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/22/2011 09:51 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >>> -#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(3, 1, 0)
> >>
> >> It may hav
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-12-05)
===
Meeting started by ajax at 18:01:03 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-12-05/fesco.2011-12-05-18.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 02:24:08PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi writes:
>
> Well, unixODBC 2.2.14 isn't going to change anymore, so I don't really
> think that end of it would be adding instability. In any case, if we
> get to the point of doing a Fedora release before upstream gets
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 10:48 -0800, Eric Smith wrote:
> I just learned in a package review about the requirement to update the
> icon cache:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
>
> I'm checking my other packages that have icons. I discovered that one
>
On 11/28/2011 12:47 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:06:32 -0800
> Josh Stone wrote:
>
>> On 11/22/2011 09:51 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>> -#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(3, 1, 0)
>>
>> It may have be helpful for the faked 2.6.4x kernels to still present a
>> 3ish L
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 10:49:39AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 17:54 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 06:19:27PM +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, and the question becomes, can we make this easier in F17?
> >
> > Yes, we can do EFI insta
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 17:44:12 +,
> Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > Go for it, I think it makes sense. For those that don't support 1.5
> > they can stay against the compat in the mean time.
>
> Based on the sample I worked with, mos
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 17:54 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 06:19:27PM +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>
> > Yes, and the question becomes, can we make this easier in F17?
>
> Yes, we can do EFI installs.
We could also blacklist all Apples to use MS-DOS partitions if you do a
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 17:44:12 +,
Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> Go for it, I think it makes sense. For those that don't support 1.5
> they can stay against the compat in the mean time.
Based on the sample I worked with, most of the ones with failed builds
are likely to be easy to fix.
Are b
I just learned in a package review about the requirement to update the
icon cache:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
I'm checking my other packages that have icons. I discovered that one
of my packages installs its icon into /usr/share/pixmap, rather tha
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 08:48 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 02/12/11 21:43, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> > Frank Murphy gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> Have you tested them?
> >> Have you provided feedback?
> >
> > Even if I did, this would not help push packages that are pending to go into
> > testing.
>
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 08:31 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 02:49:26PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> I just ran into this in Rawhide, and I don't have ipv6 blacklisted. But
> >> still:
> >>
> >> [root@adam adamw]# vi
Joao Neto silva wants you to try Dropbox! Dropbox lets you bring all your
photos, docs and videos with you anywhere and share them easily.
Get started here:
http://www.dropbox.com/link/20.nZq-LFhR0w/NjE0MjA4NTY1Njc?src=referrals_bulk9
- The Dropbox Team
Adam Jackson writes:
> I've been doing driveby rebuilds for some of these that happen to have
> been in a default install on my machine, but we still have a huge pile
> of things built against the old libpng in rawhide:
> [ajax@f17 cairomm]$ repoquery --whatrequires libpng-compat | wc -l
> 786
>
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 13:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> I did test rebuilds in mock of all rawhide packages that are reported to
>> be dependent on libpng. Out of 964 packages with dependencies on libpng,
>> we have:
>>
>> Packages that rebuil
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 13:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I did test rebuilds in mock of all rawhide packages that are reported to
> be dependent on libpng. Out of 964 packages with dependencies on libpng,
> we have:
>
> Packages that rebuilt successfully with 1.5 658
> Packages that FTBFS for non-
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Omair Majid wrote:
> For openjdk, I added this 'fix' to address bug 741821 [1]. You can look
> at the bug for details, but essentially this is just making explicit
> what the software was expecting (or using) all along.
I wonder if this could be solved by adding a
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 17:06 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 02:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> >- Any ideas, bugreports etc will be much appreciated
>
> I would be very interested in feature, which instead of mock, will run
> Koji scratch build and then will download resulti
On 11/21/2011 02:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>- Any ideas, bugreports etc will be much appreciated
I would be very interested in feature, which instead of mock, will run
Koji scratch build and then will download resulting packages from Koji.
--
Miroslav Suchy
Red Hat Satellite Engine
Hi,
On 12/03/2011 07:02 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> why are permanently with updates introduced new hidden folders
> in /etc which let alerting "rkhunter"? openjdk is only a recent
> example, but happended often in the last years with several packages
>
> [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ ls -lha /etc/.java/
>
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #689 Consider including bash-completion pac
Windows on same hardware have no issues with same external hdd
devices, hopefully this additional info helps speed-up track down of
this bug.
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:42 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi guys and galls,
> just take a peak at this bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
40 matches
Mail list logo
