Hi,
This needs immediate attention and help. I would only be able to have a
look on weekend.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713613
In case anyone can pick it up and push an update which fixes before weekend,
that would be great.
Regards,
--
Rakesh Pandit
https://fedoraproject.org
Hello, I'm Willington Vega, a systems and informatics engineer from
Colombia currently studying for masters degree in systems engineering
at Universidad Nacional. I'm a fedora user since Fedora Core 6 and now
I'm trying to get more involved.
I started with a small package earlier this year, but at
Just a quick note: I've built clutter 1.9.2 and cogl 1.9.2 in rawhide.
Both have changes sonames, and rebuilds will be required.
Matthias
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 08:18 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:47:32 -0600, RS (Richard) wrote:
> >
> >> but that's a separate problem. The shear amount of
> >> documentation/guidelines there are.
> >
> > Hey, :) you kno
Adam Williamson wrote:
> In the Great Bodhi Of The Future, for any given update, a tester will
> not simply have a comment box and a drop-down for -1, 0 or +1. They will
> see:
>
> * The list of test cases associated with the package, with a PASS / FAIL
> choice for each
>
> * Checkboxes for 'Thi
ReErrRrrrtttTTttTTTytyyTytytYuuyuiuiiuiuii
Enviado desde mi BlackBerry® de Claro Argentina
-Original Message-
From: Jiri Skala
Sender: scm-commits-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 07:49:59
To: ;
Reply-To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: [lsvp
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:52:11 -0600, ME (Manuel) wrote:
> (Cross Posting both to the Developers and Users List, sent a copy to
> Rex Dieter, who I believe is the maintainer for Kmess in the Fedora
> Community)
http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/kmess
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit eccb53f2e7af97ab1d7e215e5d857d734cd25fdf
Author: Tom "spot" Callaway
Date: Wed Nov 23 16:32:19 2011 -0500
1.241
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Gtk2.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignor
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 08:18:11AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:47:32 -0600, RS (Richard) wrote:
> >
> >> but that's a separate problem. The shear amount of
> >> documentation/guidelines there are.
> >
> > Hey, :)
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Gtk2:
82ee2af46ef9ab7b560601e3ae6f8f7a Gtk2-1.241.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/p
commit 7934a52e7db3ec93fbde6d79dda1499d9422009b
Author: Tom "spot" Callaway
Date: Wed Nov 23 16:26:19 2011 -0500
1.241
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Glib.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Glib:
412118238a372041b130c27d7992f5c3 Glib-1.241.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/p
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 02:52:11PM -0600, Manuel Escudero wrote:
> (Cross Posting both to the Developers and Users List, sent a copy to
> Rex Dieter, who I believe is the maintainer for Kmess in the Fedora
> Community)
>
> Hi, as you might have noticed in the last few days (if you are a kmess user
(Cross Posting both to the Developers and Users List, sent a copy to
Rex Dieter, who I believe is the maintainer for Kmess in the Fedora
Community)
Hi, as you might have noticed in the last few days (if you are a kmess user)
the kmess client that ships with Fedora 15 and Fedora 16 was affected by
Hi.
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:53:05 -0500, Jon Masters wrote
> The following seems to clarify that UITS embedded metadata is going to
> be found on more than just Amazon.com. Google shows various media
> companies looking for hires to write code to embedded this too.
>
> http://uits.umusic.com/faq.
Am 23.11.2011 02:23, schrieb Richard Shaw:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 11/22/2011 10:34 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> so complain rpmfusion why they are ALWAYS behind the fedora-kernel-packages
>>> and all their kmod and so on are making troubles days and weeks
On 11/23/2011 10:08 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 11/23/2011 07:57 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>>
>> I can build glusterfs fine on real RHEL6.1 using rpmbuild, both x86_64
>> and i686 with `rpmbuild -bb ...` and `rpmbuild -bb --target=i686 ...`
>> respectively.
>>
>> I can also build using mock,
On 11/23/2011 07:57 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>
> I can build glusterfs fine on real RHEL6.1 using rpmbuild, both x86_64
> and i686 with `rpmbuild -bb ...` and `rpmbuild -bb --target=i686 ...`
> respectively.
>
> I can also build using mock, both x86_64 and i386, with `mock -r
> epel-6-x86_64 --
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:54:05 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:24:46 +0100
> Till Maas wrote:
>
> > But I remember reports that contained similar information.
> > Therefore some kind of script must have existed. Maybe it was
> > related to some FTBFS reports where someone else r
I can build glusterfs fine on real RHEL6.1 using rpmbuild, both x86_64
and i686 with `rpmbuild -bb ...` and `rpmbuild -bb --target=i686 ...`
respectively.
I can also build using mock, both x86_64 and i386, with `mock -r
epel-6-x86_64 --rebuild ...` and mock -r epel-6-i386 --rebuild ...`
respe
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:47:32 -0600, RS (Richard) wrote:
>
>> but that's a separate problem. The shear amount of
>> documentation/guidelines there are.
>
> Hey, :) you know what? Troublesome newbies would like even more
> documentation, gui
Dne 22.11.2011 18:55, Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a):
>> "VO" == Vít Ondruch writes:
> VO> It would be reasonable, on the beginning of each development cycle,
> VO> to publish a list of packages which were not touched by it
> VO> maintainer in previous release.
>
> I certainly hope you real
On 11/20/2011 05:37 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:05:34 -0600,
>Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> It looks like there was a soname bump in boost yesterday. Boost affects
>> enough stuff, that there really should have been a heads up message posted to
>> the devel list about t
Hi.
I'm interested in helping out (comaintainer?), but I'm a little scared -
I don't know much about java yet, nor java packaging guidelines, or
whatever relevant guidelines, and I might need a little handholding.
Maybe you can give me something useful but not urgent that you need
done, that is e
24 matches
Mail list logo
